Proposals to clean up tour
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ottawa,ON
Posts: 642
Bikes: Univega Via Montega, Nashbar Aluminum frame/105 roadbike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Proposals to clean up tour
Let's put them all here.
My idea:
Non commercial teams. Amateur cycling clubs are invited to put forth a team. Team expenses and rider salaries are covered by the tour. Every team gets the same budget. Every rider gets the same salary. Teams and riders may not accept $$ sponsorships or other salaries while on a tour team. In kind sponsorships of equipment and services come out of the team budget to keep the playing field level.
Medical services are provided by tour doctors.
Sponsors may sponsor the whole tour. Provide money for ads, bikes/equipment for riders.
Make being invited to participate in the tour a huge honor. If a rider/team cheats, it's a huge DIShonor. Teams can be punished by ejecting them from the tour, and not asking them to participate for a number of years.
Any windfalls from winning come from personal sponsorships after a rider is finished their riding career. If they get caught cheating, this will likely evaporate completely.
My idea:
Non commercial teams. Amateur cycling clubs are invited to put forth a team. Team expenses and rider salaries are covered by the tour. Every team gets the same budget. Every rider gets the same salary. Teams and riders may not accept $$ sponsorships or other salaries while on a tour team. In kind sponsorships of equipment and services come out of the team budget to keep the playing field level.
Medical services are provided by tour doctors.
Sponsors may sponsor the whole tour. Provide money for ads, bikes/equipment for riders.
Make being invited to participate in the tour a huge honor. If a rider/team cheats, it's a huge DIShonor. Teams can be punished by ejecting them from the tour, and not asking them to participate for a number of years.
Any windfalls from winning come from personal sponsorships after a rider is finished their riding career. If they get caught cheating, this will likely evaporate completely.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,757
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My 'new' proposal is to test the riders endlessly: all riders before and after every stage. Off season weekly testing. If you want to ride on the Pro Tour, you will sacrifice all privacy. And have a "death penalty"...fail test = banned for life from the Pro Tour.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Let's put them all here.
My idea:
Non commercial teams. Amateur cycling clubs are invited to put forth a team. Team expenses and rider salaries are covered by the tour. Every team gets the same budget. Every rider gets the same salary. Teams and riders may not accept $$ sponsorships or other salaries while on a tour team. In kind sponsorships of equipment and services come out of the team budget to keep the playing field level.
My idea:
Non commercial teams. Amateur cycling clubs are invited to put forth a team. Team expenses and rider salaries are covered by the tour. Every team gets the same budget. Every rider gets the same salary. Teams and riders may not accept $$ sponsorships or other salaries while on a tour team. In kind sponsorships of equipment and services come out of the team budget to keep the playing field level.
Please name the division 3 NCAA champion for any sport in the last 5 years. The TDF is followed because it has the best. No one would care if the second best rode the same route. You are proposing second or third level riders and it would get the same level of interest that other second and third level competitions get.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,690
Bikes: Serotta Nove
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I said before the riders should only be allowed to be treated by approved doctors except in the case of an emergency. The doctors can be hired and paid for by the organizations through a tax paid by the riders.
If the riders are caught going to any other doctor they are suspended.
If a rider is caught doping all career earnings are seized.
I know it is far fetched, and dope would be obtained in other ways, but it may give pause.
Richard
If the riders are caught going to any other doctor they are suspended.
If a rider is caught doping all career earnings are seized.
I know it is far fetched, and dope would be obtained in other ways, but it may give pause.
Richard
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,690
Bikes: Serotta Nove
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Last year was pretty good without Basso, Lance, Ullrich, and Vino.
This year has been really good without Lance, Ullrich, Basso, and Landis.
Richard
This year has been really good without Lance, Ullrich, Basso, and Landis.
Richard
Please name the division 3 NCAA champion for any sport in the last 5 years. The TDF is followed because it has the best. No one would care if the second best rode the same route. You are proposing second or third level riders and it would get the same level of interest that other second and third level competitions get.
#6
Left OZ now in Malaysia
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lancashire England, but at the moment on an extended tour of South East Asia
Posts: 826
Bikes: Thorn Ravan Catlayst, Bill Nickson tourer, Bill Nickson Time Trial, Claud Butler Cape Wrath, Motobecame Tandem etc etc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Or all riders could be asked to sign a "pledge"
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,690
Bikes: Serotta Nove
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#10
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,299
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1443 Post(s)
Liked 713 Times
in
367 Posts
#11
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,299
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1443 Post(s)
Liked 713 Times
in
367 Posts
Meaningful penalities against the Teams, DS, and other team management personel. They have the opportunity to observe and stop doping. They need to be given the incentive.
#12
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Proposal #1:
Let them all dope, once they turn professional. You get to that stage, you know the risks and rewards.
Proposal #2:
1 month amnesty period announced in pro cycling. Admit to doping, you get to keep your previous wins, but also get a 1 year suspension. Anyone caught after the amnesty, banned for life.
One thing is for certain, the drip drip of constant allegations has got to end. The integrity of the sport can make a comeback, but only after the cheaters are all washed out.
Let them all dope, once they turn professional. You get to that stage, you know the risks and rewards.
Proposal #2:
1 month amnesty period announced in pro cycling. Admit to doping, you get to keep your previous wins, but also get a 1 year suspension. Anyone caught after the amnesty, banned for life.
One thing is for certain, the drip drip of constant allegations has got to end. The integrity of the sport can make a comeback, but only after the cheaters are all washed out.
#13
Longing for a Tail Wind
Let them use performance enhancing items.
Aren't those super light carbon wheels marketed as being performance enhancing? I know I can't survive doing my job without my morning coffee, I think it enhances my performance, do I need to get tested?
Plenty of people spend money seeing the latest actor/actress that has had their performance enhanced by surgery, why all the disdain for athletes? Sure, it would be grand to have our little ideal vision of cycling (or any other sport for that matter), but this is a grey world, there are, will, and always have been cheaters.
Honestly, maybe sponsor pressure will make a difference. But until these cyclists start blowing the whistle on their teammates, I don't see how progress will be made.
Aren't those super light carbon wheels marketed as being performance enhancing? I know I can't survive doing my job without my morning coffee, I think it enhances my performance, do I need to get tested?
Plenty of people spend money seeing the latest actor/actress that has had their performance enhanced by surgery, why all the disdain for athletes? Sure, it would be grand to have our little ideal vision of cycling (or any other sport for that matter), but this is a grey world, there are, will, and always have been cheaters.
Honestly, maybe sponsor pressure will make a difference. But until these cyclists start blowing the whistle on their teammates, I don't see how progress will be made.
#14
Punk Rock Lives
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Throughout the west in a van, on my bike, and in the forest
Posts: 3,305
Bikes: Long Haul Trucker with BRIFTERS!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times
in
39 Posts
Or would the difference be so great, that it would make the TDF meaningless?
roughstuff
#15
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,922
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
If doping is to be put to an end, the incentive for DS's to either help riders get away with it, or to turn a blind eye to it needs to be eliminated.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#16
more ape than man
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nyc
Posts: 8,091
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Not to be silly, but would it help to have a "drug division" in the TDF, where the riders IN THAT CLASS would not be tested, could take whatever drug they wanted, and be left alone? Then, by comparing their times and performance with the other riders (assuming those other weasels were monitored meaningfully enough that they took few, or zero, drugs) we could see exactly what the difference in performance was really all about?
Or would the difference be so great, that it would make the TDF meaningless?
roughstuff
Or would the difference be so great, that it would make the TDF meaningless?
roughstuff
natural:
"enhanced"
#17
Its Freakin HammerTime!!!
My proposal:
Once The pos test comes in for said rider, said rider is not allowed in any sanctioned raced in the world. Not even a pickup race down at the local club.
That would help.
Once The pos test comes in for said rider, said rider is not allowed in any sanctioned raced in the world. Not even a pickup race down at the local club.
That would help.
#19
Let's Pound
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The high mountains of Nebraska
Posts: 32
Bikes: Not enough
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
OR... just screw it and let the dudes just dope. At this point I'm so jaded that I go on the assumption that they're all doing it and I really don't care anymore.
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Not to be silly, but would it help to have a "drug division" in the TDF, where the riders IN THAT CLASS would not be tested, could take whatever drug they wanted, and be left alone? Then, by comparing their times and performance with the other riders (assuming those other weasels were monitored meaningfully enough that they took few, or zero, drugs) we could see exactly what the difference in performance was really all about?
Or would the difference be so great, that it would make the TDF meaningless?
Or would the difference be so great, that it would make the TDF meaningless?
The average life expectancy of an NFL player is 55 years.
#22
Duathlete
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,156
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It is short, but there are many factors.
This is mainly based on the earlier years of the NFL. Those guys were shot up with anything to get them out there one more play.
Secondly, many NFL players (especially years ago) are not in good shape at all. Many are just fat and strong. They get fatter and weaker when they stop playing. Many are hurting and on all kinds of painkillers or worse.
Thirdly, many older players have no health insurance to speak of and do not get treatment they should.
Lastly, Suicide is not all that uncommon with the hurting old broke players
None of this is to say NFLers do not dope and cyclist do . . . NFL's clearly did at some level and clearly still do at some level.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
You don't see the difference between not having 4 riders (one of whom is retired anyway) vrs excluding basically all pro riders? That is like saying college football did not miss one college being on suspension vrs eleminating all of division 1 and 2.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 1,380
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think that unless you penalize the sponsors and coaches too, that little will happen. You fine Astana and pull all of their commercial exposure, but still make them pay for it...ban some coaches for a few years or even life, and it will change fast. The athlete has less to lose over the short-term than the sponsors and coaches. Most of the riders know on some level that they cannot ride forever, but you punish the money sponsors, or make a few carreer coaches go back to flipping hamburgers...
#25
Duathlete
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,156
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Toughest question out there. IMHO there will always be people to replace those banned for years. There are so many riders just outside that top level. Banning people just takes someone out and puts someone else in who is just as likely to do it. Same with teams, coaches, and maybe even sponsors. The second you say you will fine sponsors they are gone. Why take the risk?
The culture has to change and I do not know how that can happen. I do not think it is as shameful as others here think it is to be caught. It is more like . . . sucks to be you, you got caught (all while knowing they did it as well)
The culture has to change and I do not know how that can happen. I do not think it is as shameful as others here think it is to be caught. It is more like . . . sucks to be you, you got caught (all while knowing they did it as well)