Question on time bonuses
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Moraga, CA
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: 2008 Cervelo RS, 2011 Scott CR1 Elite, 2014 Volagi Liscio
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Question on time bonuses
Why do some stage winners get time bonuses and others don't get any? What decides whether there are time bonuses available?
thanks,
Cliff
thanks,
Cliff
#4
Out the door
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: northern California
Posts: 364
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Any clue why they dropped the time bonuses?
I've been trying to find out why they decided to drop the time bonuses. Anyone out there have an idea?
#5
Double Prick
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Canadian version of Texas
Posts: 561
Bikes: Cervelo Carbon Soloist, Cervelo Aluminum Soloist, Cannondale cyclecross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Makes it more interesting
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
They didn't jsut get rid of the time bonuses, they also dropped the prologue and made the first 2 stage finishes not pure sprinters stages. Meaning both have the possibility of an actual time gap near the front. That gives a good chance of someone unexpected grabbing an early yellow.
In the mountians no time bonuses could lead to more old style cooperation between a lone GC contender and a non contender as with no time on the line at the end stage for teamwork (and time) is a good trade and one that would get kept.
It will be interesting to see how it plays out.
In the mountians no time bonuses could lead to more old style cooperation between a lone GC contender and a non contender as with no time on the line at the end stage for teamwork (and time) is a good trade and one that would get kept.
It will be interesting to see how it plays out.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Near Sacramento
Posts: 4,886
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Maybe just to simplify things. I really like not having time bonuses.
__________________
-------
Some sort of pithy irrelevant one-liner should go here.
-------
Some sort of pithy irrelevant one-liner should go here.
#9
hehe... member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 665
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm liking the lack of time bonuses. It's simpler and "classic". Seems appropriate with this year's almost vintage-style Tour. It also keeps the racing closer as there's no way to "artificially" lower your time. It would have worked great last year with a more climbing intensive parcours. Anyone willing to do the math and see what would have happened to the GC with no bonuses?
#10
or tarckeemoon, depending
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the pesto of cities
Posts: 7,017
Bikes: Davidson Impulse, Merckx Titanium AX, Bruce Gordon Rock & Road, Cross Check custom build, On-One Il Pomino, Shawver Cycles cross, Zion 737, Mercian Vincitore, Brompton S1L, Charge Juicer
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
It's made for an interesting first few days.
#11
Elitist Troglodyte
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,925
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If there were bonuses, seems like Team Columbia would be guarding the Maillot Jaune (Kirchen) now.
(I forget, were there bonuses for the TTs?)
(I forget, were there bonuses for the TTs?)
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: McDonough, Georgia
Posts: 860
Bikes: Trek 1000 & 4100 & 5500
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I can relate. I've got a coworker who thinks they should all be GPS timestamped when they cross the line. Finishing safely in the peloton could cost you seconds on every stage. I like the idea of same time for the group for safety reasons. Plus, there's usually no reason for a GC contender to be attempting to stay at the front of the sprint group to avoid losing a few seconds.
I did like the drama that the time bonuses brought with regard to people overcoming a few ticks of the clock to move up a position in the GC near the end, a la Vino when he pipped....Levi maybe.... a few years ago in Paris on the last day.
Either way, it's worth watching.
Michael
I did like the drama that the time bonuses brought with regard to people overcoming a few ticks of the clock to move up a position in the GC near the end, a la Vino when he pipped....Levi maybe.... a few years ago in Paris on the last day.
Either way, it's worth watching.
Michael
__________________
RIP Stacey. =3.
RIP Stacey. =3.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,481
Bikes: Too many to list!
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I thought I wouldn't like this year's format .... but you know what .... I do like it! The pure sprinters in this year's Tour, however .... not so much.
... Brad
... Brad
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Physically, CT / Mentally, San Francisco
Posts: 207
Bikes: BMC Team Machine, BMC Road Racer, BMC Streetfire, BMC AlpenChallenge
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'm really enjoying this year's tour, perhaps even more than any other I've watched. There's something to be said for not having a 'favorite' (a'la Lance), leaving it wide open. It's been terrific fun so far.
#17
Cheers!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Woodinville
Posts: 1,284
Bikes: Scott Addict R15, Cadd 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree with Brad. I thought it was a bad move while watching the first few stages, but now, I see it's keeping things tight and exciting.
__________________
#18
Can't ride enough!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: south Louisiana
Posts: 1,235
Bikes: IFab Crown Jewel, Giant Defy, Hardtail MTB, Fuji finest, Bianchi FG conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
How about no radios next year?
or
or
#19
Batüwü Creakcreak
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The illadelph
Posts: 20,791
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times
in
160 Posts
No. Radios stay. Breakaways have already shown that they can work in this tour even with the radios. For safety reasons, they should stay.
Though, I think it would be really really really interesting if each rider was given a radio with different channels, each channel for a language. The riders would be warned by the race organizers through translators and what not about dangers on the course, time gaps, etc. All the organizing for the chase and such would have to be done by the teams on their own without directors.
During TT's the radio would be between the rider and the team car.
I think that would be interesting. If the reason behind radios is to warn riders of dangers, then this would satisfy that need, while forcing the riders to think on their own, making it a rolling game of chess where the pawns are king.
Though, I think it would be really really really interesting if each rider was given a radio with different channels, each channel for a language. The riders would be warned by the race organizers through translators and what not about dangers on the course, time gaps, etc. All the organizing for the chase and such would have to be done by the teams on their own without directors.
During TT's the radio would be between the rider and the team car.
I think that would be interesting. If the reason behind radios is to warn riders of dangers, then this would satisfy that need, while forcing the riders to think on their own, making it a rolling game of chess where the pawns are king.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,881
Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 766 Post(s)
Liked 1,737 Times
in
1,012 Posts
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: northern California
Posts: 5,603
Bikes: Bruce Gordon BLT, Cannondale parts bike, Ecodyne recumbent trike, Counterpoint Opus 2, miyata 1000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
They have better then GPS now. Note the little yellow thingies on the left chainstay. A widget that allows recording the exact time they pass sensors at the finish and other places. Can anyone give details?
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,881
Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 766 Post(s)
Liked 1,737 Times
in
1,012 Posts
seems to me you have the details. That is exactly what it does.
#24
Mrs. umd
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,399
Bikes: Specialized Dolce Vita & Transition
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
They're gonna stick with giving everyone in the group the same time. Event though they could hypothetically give everybody their own time. It would be way too dangerous if the GC leaders & their teams were up there trying to contend with the sprinters, and imagine what it would be like towards the back of the pack! Elbowing, pushing, crashes galore, just to not lose time.