Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 38 of 38

Thread: Bad Move Greg

  1. #26
    Senior Member pwyll99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    2007 Bianchi 1885 Veloce, 2003 Specialized Rockhopper, 2006 Rocky Mountain Slayer 50, 2006 Electra Ratrod
    Posts
    107
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've always wondered what affect the chemotherapy, etc. had on Lance.

    I remember not being able to get angry about anything for years after I finished chemo back in 1980. Since I wasn't athletic at the time I don't know if it affected me in any way related to endurance etc. Of course now, I have to deal with the occasional tumor that developed due to the chemo.
    John

    2003 Specialized Rockhopper
    2006 Rocky Mountain Slayer 50
    2006 Electra Ratrod
    2007 Bianchi 1885 Veloce

  2. #27
    Senior Member jaxgtr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    My Bikes
    Cannondale SuperSix, Trek 7300, Trek CrossRip
    Posts
    3,931
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I also think Trek dropping his brand is another reason for this.
    Brian | 2013 Cannondale SuperSix 5 | 2014 Trek CrossRip Comp | 2003 Trek 7300
    Quote Originally Posted by AEO View Post
    you should learn to embrace change, and mock it's failings every step of the way.

  3. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Oceanside
    Posts
    409
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i'm not clear as to why it's a bad move on greg lemond's part. perhaps i question his motives. is lemond jealous? could he have won 6 or more tours if he wasn't shot in the chest and didn't give hinault a free win? is he just trying to portray himself as the last clean tdf winner, before epo, hgh, autologous transfusions, etc became mainstream? or perhaps he really wants to do his part to clean up a dirty sport? whatever. we make our own conclusions, and in the end, we probably won't care about the opinions of those who disagree with us. i doubt lemond or armstrong give a crap what any of us think.

    if we care about doping in cycling, lemond brings up some good points. doping controls are predictable, and if you know you will beat the controls, it doesn't matter how frequently you are tested. merely passing some tests doesn't prove innocence. lemond's statement calls into question the knowledge and validity of armstrong's pocket doping expert.

    if we don't care about doping or believe armstrong is not a doper, then armstrong was the strongest guy on the strongest team for 7 straight years, and why are you reading this? all of armstrong's competition (ullrich, pantani, hamilton, landis, heras, basso, and vinokourov, to name the ones that come to mind)has been sanctioned for doping. if armstrong wasn't clean, was he cheating any more than anyone else? and please don't mention the cancer crap. to suggest that armstrong won 7 straight tours because cancer made him lighter and tougher is idiocy. how many other people has cancer made superhuman? shiit maybe i should start smoking...

    here is an interesting development: today the french anti-doping authority offered to retest armstrong's 6 positive samples (epo) from 1999, for which he has never satisfactorily answered. the ball (lance's one superduper post-cancer nut) is in lance's court. i am curious as to how he will respond to this. i think he is a doper and a liar, but also the strongest rider in 7 straight tours de france.

  4. #29
    Señor Member USAZorro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Carlisle, PA
    My Bikes
    1954 Hetchins M.O., 1959 Viking Severn Valley, 1970 Raleigh Pro, 1972 Fuji "The Finest", 1974 Raleigh Superbe&Comp, 1976 Raleigh Team Pro, 1994 Trek 830 MTB, 2000 Bob Jackson Arrowhead, Unicycle
    Posts
    13,034
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You're behind. Lance already replied.

    When I started this thread, it was because I was put off by Greg's means. Regardless of his motives (which only he truly knows), I consider the rude manner in which he chooses to pursue his crusade inexcusable.

    Quote Originally Posted by jabantik00 View Post
    i'm not clear as to why it's a bad move on greg lemond's part. perhaps i question his motives. is lemond jealous? could he have won 6 or more tours if he wasn't shot in the chest and didn't give hinault a free win? is he just trying to portray himself as the last clean tdf winner, before epo, hgh, autologous transfusions, etc became mainstream? or perhaps he really wants to do his part to clean up a dirty sport? whatever. we make our own conclusions, and in the end, we probably won't care about the opinions of those who disagree with us. i doubt lemond or armstrong give a crap what any of us think.

    if we care about doping in cycling, lemond brings up some good points. doping controls are predictable, and if you know you will beat the controls, it doesn't matter how frequently you are tested. merely passing some tests doesn't prove innocence. lemond's statement calls into question the knowledge and validity of armstrong's pocket doping expert.

    if we don't care about doping or believe armstrong is not a doper, then armstrong was the strongest guy on the strongest team for 7 straight years, and why are you reading this? all of armstrong's competition (ullrich, pantani, hamilton, landis, heras, basso, and vinokourov, to name the ones that come to mind)has been sanctioned for doping. if armstrong wasn't clean, was he cheating any more than anyone else? and please don't mention the cancer crap. to suggest that armstrong won 7 straight tours because cancer made him lighter and tougher is idiocy. how many other people has cancer made superhuman? shiit maybe i should start smoking...

    here is an interesting development: today the french anti-doping authority offered to retest armstrong's 6 positive samples (epo) from 1999, for which he has never satisfactorily answered. the ball (lance's one superduper post-cancer nut) is in lance's court. i am curious as to how he will respond to this. i think he is a doper and a liar, but also the strongest rider in 7 straight tours de france.
    The search for inner peace continues...

  5. #30
    50000 Guatts of power 127.0.0.1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,001
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Lemond's motives are simple. make cycling, and by proxy all sports, fair and safe.

    he just has a grating approach and gets in the face of people. is it wrong ? one thing for sure
    he gets press. any press is good press...he keeps the drug issues on the front page

    as long as he doesn't lie...or speculate....

  6. #31
    Señor Member USAZorro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Carlisle, PA
    My Bikes
    1954 Hetchins M.O., 1959 Viking Severn Valley, 1970 Raleigh Pro, 1972 Fuji "The Finest", 1974 Raleigh Superbe&Comp, 1976 Raleigh Team Pro, 1994 Trek 830 MTB, 2000 Bob Jackson Arrowhead, Unicycle
    Posts
    13,034
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 127.0.0.1 View Post
    Lemond's motives are simple. make cycling, and by proxy all sports, fair and safe.

    he just has a grating approach and gets in the face of people. is it wrong ? one thing for sure
    he gets press. any press is good press...he keeps the drug issues on the front page

    as long as he doesn't lie...or speculate....
    Those are his stated motives. Given his actions though, I have to wonder whether there's more to it than that. If I was so driven to make cycling drug free, I wouldn't be going about it by trying to discredit riders - past or present. That's the job for the labs and the anti-doping agencies. What the heck is there to be gained by slinging unprovable allegations about? You think ASO, UCI and many of the Pro Teams aren't getting the message?

    The situation is improving, but I honestly don't see how Greg is advancing things.
    The search for inner peace continues...

  7. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    N Dallas, TX
    Posts
    830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jabantik00 View Post
    lemond's statement calls into question the knowledge and validity of armstrong's pocket doping expert.
    I believe Don Catlin is recognized as one of the foremost anti doping experts in the US. As the head UCLA’s WADA Agency accredited laboratory (also widely recognized as one of the best labs in the world) he was the expert brought in by WADA to validate dope test procedures in court. I think he was one of the driving forces behind the development of useable EPO test. I have read articles by him a few years ago trying to develop methods to address testings biggest problem ... that the tests always lag behind the current drug of choice. Things like genetic and athletic performance profiles to identify unreasonable spikes in performance as indicative of doping rather than a positive test for a specific drug.

    At least Catlin is doing something proactive to address the issue of doping in sport. So he is being paid to do it by Armstrong ... somebody has to pay for it, it doesn't happen gratis. Team Highroad and CSC, who get good marks for running clean programs, pay for their own testing too ... and to my understanding are not going to the extent that Armstrongs program is planning. LeMond seems to be flailing at the windmills of the past while contributing nothing to proactively deal with the current and future doping problem.

  8. #33
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Laurinburg, NC
    My Bikes
    '11 Focus Culebro, '97 Raleigh R700, '92 Paramount Series 5, '93 Diamondback Axis TR
    Posts
    911
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 127.0.0.1 View Post
    Lemond's motives are simple. make cycling, and by proxy all sports, fair and safe.
    He isn't doing anything for that. If that were his motive he wouldn't be following one person around.
    Quote Originally Posted by pastorbobnlnh View Post
    Don't you think that someone who has been on C&V for 9 years and has 8000+ post knows a little something about chain replacement?

  9. #34
    Fun in the tub, no ring! mrbubl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    127
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Lemond has an attitude and a chip on his shoulder. When he rode & won he was not a hero or a celebrity in the USA other than from a select group of admirers that followed the sport. LA surpassed the accomplishments of GL and is the record holder, with all of the celebrity and fame.
    For those that did not read LA's books, he did in fact DOPE during his chemo with EPO when his chances of survival were <10% per the medical wisdom. Maybe he became a mini hulk without all of the green goo.
    If you have followed GL rants and his history with his bike brand and the relationship, or lack thereof with Trek and the late Trek president. True to form, he was a radical with them before, during and after their agreement and relationship.

  10. #35
    Twilight Requiem AdrianFly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Lonely Mountain
    My Bikes
    TrekFX
    Posts
    453
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    To some Lemond is a madman. An insane stalker who just won't leave Armstrong alone no matter where they may be together.

    It's hilarious, entertaining and most importantly ticks off the "Haters" thus creating bad publicity for ol Greg.


    If you just see the whole thing for what it is then you too, will find the humor in it. I mean cmon... Lance goes up to give a speech and Greg is right there front row center. HILARIOUS!

    The Bearded Fred: Only known cyclist left in the world to be 100% natural and completely free from performance enhancing drugs. Also known for self reliance, amazing talent for satisfying the women and great guitar riffs. Honestly, a full racing kit is absolutely the most ridiculous looking stuff you can wear short of a clown suit."

  11. #36
    Senior Member jaxgtr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    My Bikes
    Cannondale SuperSix, Trek 7300, Trek CrossRip
    Posts
    3,931
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by AdrianFly View Post
    ... If you just see the whole thing for what it is then you too, will find the humor in it. I mean cmon... Lance goes up to give a speech and Greg is right there front row center. HILARIOUS!
    And LA let him ask the first question just to get the little troll out of the way.
    Brian | 2013 Cannondale SuperSix 5 | 2014 Trek CrossRip Comp | 2003 Trek 7300
    Quote Originally Posted by AEO View Post
    you should learn to embrace change, and mock it's failings every step of the way.

  12. #37
    I STILL miss East Hill :) Rollfast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Where my bike's at
    My Bikes
    a lot
    Posts
    2,583
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 127.0.0.1 View Post
    Lemond's motives are simple. make cycling, and by proxy all sports, fair and safe.
    Settle it fair and square. Make them ride Western Flyer tricycles.

  13. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,628
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The problem I have with Lemonds' approach is his total black and white perspective on the matter. His absolute belief in the VOmax and wattage test is such that we might as well just give everyone the test and assign places in the race without racing since no one can ever perform above that which occurs in a "lab tested situation". This implies that the lab test is 100 percent valid in other circumstances and that we know absolutely everything there is to know about how the human body works. If this is true why haven't we cured cancer and other problems.

    Unfortunately the "lab test" does not include how things like faith, will, pain endurance and other motivations effect the human body in a real competition. Nor as Lemond describes it allow for anyone to improve thier performance beyond a certain genetic baseline. Lemond believes that Lance could not ride faster than him without drugs because in testing Lemond had one of the highest VOmax ever recorded at 92 or some such high number. Several points higher than Lances Vomax. There is certainly some credibility to this arguement but there are certainly other things going on in the body which may effect oxygen utilization and some of which may not yet be understood.

    It is now being learned that the human body is more than only a chemical machine so there is a whole lot more to this picture than just basic chemistry. What I am waiting to see is a rider with Lemonds genetics and Armstrongs discipline, will power and pain endurance. That rider would be superman
    Last edited by Hezz; 10-06-08 at 09:18 PM.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •