Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Professional Cycling For the Fans Follow the Tour de France,the Giro de Italia, the Spring Classics, or other professional cycling races? Here's your home...

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-07-09, 01:12 PM   #1
babysaph38
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Tour de France-I don't get it

So if Cavendish won 2 stages shouldn't he be leading. I don't understand the way the points are given. Seems that the rider that gets from point a to be the fastest would be the winner. Where can you go learn the scoring.
babysaph38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-09, 01:28 PM   #2
Laggard
Lance Hater
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Bikes:
Posts: 4,403
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
The rider with the lowest total elapsed time is the leader. Cav may have won two stages but he lost lots of time in the TT and thus is not the leader. You can with a stage race without winning a single stage. Anyone know the last time this was done?
Laggard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-09, 01:33 PM   #3
DMF 
Elitist Troglodyte
 
DMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Posts: 6,924
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
He *is* leading - the Green Jersey (points) competition. The GC competition (overall leader) is a whole different animal.

There are five major competitions going on simultaneously:

General Classification (Yellow Jersey) - total elapsed time
Sprint or Points (Green Jersey) - total sprint points earned
King of the Mountain (Polka Dot Jersey) - total climber points earned
Young Rider (White Jersey) - GC for 24(?) and under
Team (Yellow Numbers) - total elapsed time for the top three team members on each stage

http://www.letour.fr/2009/TDF/LIVE/us/reglements.html
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

- Will Rogers

Last edited by DMF; 07-07-09 at 01:46 PM.
DMF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-09, 01:58 PM   #4
Dolomiti
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 583
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
When a bunch of riders finish a stage together, they're all awarded the same time. So unless there are any gaps, the rider who wins a sprint finishes with the same time as the last placed rider on the stage.
Dolomiti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-09, 02:03 PM   #5
kimconyc
Seņor Member
 
kimconyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Bikes: 2011 Hampsten Travelissimo Gran Paradiso Ti | 2007 Bianchi HoC 928 SL | 2001 De Rosa Neo Primato - Batik Del Monte, Genius | 1991 Eddy Merckx - Motorola, TSX
Posts: 3,729
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laggard View Post
The rider with the lowest total elapsed time is the leader. Cav may have won two stages but he lost lots of time in the TT and thus is not the leader. You can with a stage race without winning a single stage. Anyone know the last time this was done?
Perhaps Oscar Pereiro 2006?

Lemond won in 1990 this way.
kimconyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-09, 02:10 PM   #6
wearyourtruth
Ride for Life
 
wearyourtruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Baltimore
Bikes:
Posts: 2,729
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laggard View Post
The rider with the lowest total elapsed time is the leader. Cav may have won two stages but he lost lots of time in the TT and thus is not the leader.
true. here is a very basic example with 3 riders and a 4 stage race:

Stage 1:
1st: racer A: 9min
2nd: racer B: 10min
3rd: racer C: 12min
(winner A)

Stage 2:
1st: racer B: 10min
2nd: racer C: 12min
3rd: racer A: 13min
(winner B)

Stage 3:
1st: racer C: 12min
2nd: racer B: 13min
3rd: racer A: 15min
(winner C)

Stage 4:
1st: racer A: 7min
2nd: racer B: 8min
3rd: racer C: 10min
(winner A)

Overall:
1st: racer B: 41min
2nd: racer A: 44min
3rd: racer C: 46min

even though racer A won 2 stages and racer B only won 1, racer B was never far behind when he didn't win and the total of his 4 times is less than his competitors
wearyourtruth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-09, 03:41 PM   #7
Keith99
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Just a historical note. In the early years of the TDF there were a few tours where placeing determined the winner. Some pretty much like the green Jersey of today, but at least one year where it was finishing position of each stage and lowest score wins.
Keith99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-09, 04:49 PM   #8
Allen H
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Piedmont, CA
Bikes: '04 LeMond Buenos Aires
Posts: 584
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Follow the GC times & standings and don't pay so much attention to who wins a stage - it's all about cumulative time gaps, not stage wins, if you want to understand the Tour.
Allen H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-09, 05:14 PM   #9
Howzit
Big Blade
 
Howzit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 950
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Although I hate Lance, this is why after stage 4, to me, Lance has done an insanely amazing job.
This is a guy who was retired for the last 4 years. Remember that more than half the peleton is struggling just to FINISH the Tour.
There are guys here who won the Tour during his retirement!!

And here Lance is, after stage 4 pretty much in Yellow. Like I said, as much as I hate Lance, there is no way around not giving the guy props.
I know how hard it is to race bikes, and this performance to me, after only 4 days and in yellow, after years of retirement form the top of the sport, is hard core.

As others are saying, follow the overall standing, and you will understand why im impressed with him.
Howzit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-09, 07:31 PM   #10
jaxgtr
Senior Member
 
jaxgtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Bikes: Trek ALR 6, Trek CrossRip, Trek X-Caliber 8
Posts: 4,356
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laggard View Post
The rider with the lowest total elapsed time is the leader. Cav may have won two stages but he lost lots of time in the TT and thus is not the leader. You can with a stage race without winning a single stage. Anyone know the last time this was done?
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimconyc View Post

Lemond won in 1990 this way.
Winner, winner, winner...
__________________
Brian | 2015 Trek Emonda ALR 6 | 2015 Trek X-Caliber 8 | 2014 Trek CrossRip Comp
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEO View Post
you should learn to embrace change, and mock it's failings every step of the way.
jaxgtr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-09, 01:44 AM   #11
Gordon Gekko
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Said another way, TDF scoring methods are similar to golf's stroke play (yellow and white jerseys) and match play (green and polka dot jerseys) scoring methods.
Gordon Gekko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-09, 03:24 AM   #12
Metzinger
Primate
 
Metzinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: gone
Bikes: Concorde Columbus SL, Rocky Mountain Edge, Sparta stadfiets
Posts: 2,582
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
A lot of useful info here.
I had always assumed that at the end of each stage, Don King decides who is the leader. Regardless of placing.

Isn't that the way it works in boxing?
Metzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-09, 04:53 AM   #13
gabdy
Senior Member
 
gabdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes: Trek, Giant, PoS
Posts: 1,485
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
They use WADA scientists to work out the winner, it's far too complicated for most people.
__________________
Courage
Skill
gabdy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-09, 06:11 AM   #14
USAZorro
Seņor Member
 
USAZorro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florence, KY
Bikes: 1954 Hetchins M.O., 1959 Viking Severn Valley, 1970 Raleigh Pro, 1972 Fuji "The Finest", 1974 Raleigh Superbe&Comp, 1976 Raleigh Team Pro, 1996 Giant Iguana, 2000 Bob Jackson Arrowhead
Posts: 14,555
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 66 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gabdy View Post
They use WADA scientists to work out the winner, it's far too complicated for most people.
Touche.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
USAZorro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-09, 07:13 AM   #15
Griffin2020
On the road to health.
 
Griffin2020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Arlington, TX
Bikes: Specialized Allez, Cervelo RS is in process.
Posts: 603
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howzit View Post
Although I hate Lance, this is why after stage 4, to me, Lance has done an insanely amazing job.
This is a guy who was retired for the last 4 years. Remember that more than half the peleton is struggling just to FINISH the Tour.
There are guys here who won the Tour during his retirement!!

And here Lance is, after stage 4 pretty much in Yellow. Like I said, as much as I hate Lance, there is no way around not giving the guy props.
I know how hard it is to race bikes, and this performance to me, after only 4 days and in yellow, after years of retirement form the top of the sport, is hard core.

As others are saying, follow the overall standing, and you will understand why im impressed with him.
Who are you, and what did you do with Howzit?
Griffin2020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-09, 07:33 AM   #16
chipcom 
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Posts: 24,366
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howzit View Post
Although I hate Lance, this is why after stage 4, to me, Lance has done an insanely amazing job.
This is a guy who was retired for the last 4 years. Remember that more than half the peleton is struggling just to FINISH the Tour.
There are guys here who won the Tour during his retirement!!

And here Lance is, after stage 4 pretty much in Yellow. Like I said, as much as I hate Lance, there is no way around not giving the guy props.
I know how hard it is to race bikes, and this performance to me, after only 4 days and in yellow, after years of retirement form the top of the sport, is hard core.

As others are saying, follow the overall standing, and you will understand why im impressed with him.
What does any of this have to do with the topic of this thread? I understand that you have some kind of obsession with Lance Armstrong, but please confine your enthusiasm to threads where he is the topic. I appreciate your cooperation. Thanks.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-09, 09:26 AM   #17
dolfinack
Member
 
dolfinack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Griffin2020 View Post
Who are you, and what did you do with Howzit?
I was just thinking that...

Back to the thread... so if my newb brain is correct... seeing as LA and Cancellara are equal in time, if Lance breaks away and beats Cancellara in the next stage by more than a bike length he'll be in yellow?? If I understand the scoring i'll enjoy it a heckuvalot more. Please correct me if i'm wrong (entirely probable!)
dolfinack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-09, 09:56 AM   #18
luxroadie
I read more than post
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Luxembourg
Bikes:
Posts: 266
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by griffin2020 View Post
who are you, and what did you do with howzit?
+1
luxroadie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-09, 09:58 AM   #19
Keith99
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dolfinack View Post
I was just thinking that...

Back to the thread... so if my newb brain is correct... seeing as LA and Cancellara are equal in time, if Lance breaks away and beats Cancellara in the next stage by more than a bike length he'll be in yellow?? If I understand the scoring i'll enjoy it a heckuvalot more. Please correct me if i'm wrong (entirely probable!)
It is actually a judgement call if there is a large enough gap for time differences. They often do not count gaps that open back in the peleton when riders are coasting over the line that would be counted up front when riders are sprinting for the line.

The intent of the same time rule is that riders are not jockeying for seconds in the middle of the pack, which would create a very dangerous situation.

But yes, if Lance breaks off the front and gets a gap he will get a second or more.
Keith99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-09, 11:55 AM   #20
dolfinack
Member
 
dolfinack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith99 View Post
It is actually a judgement call if there is a large enough gap for time differences. They often do not count gaps that open back in the peleton when riders are coasting over the line that would be counted up front when riders are sprinting for the line.

The intent of the same time rule is that riders are not jockeying for seconds in the middle of the pack, which would create a very dangerous situation.

But yes, if Lance breaks off the front and gets a gap he will get a second or more.
Cool makes sense, thanks buddy.
dolfinack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-09, 12:06 PM   #21
Paniolo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: N Dallas, TX
Bikes:
Posts: 830
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yeah, on flat stages if you finish with a group they all get the same time from the first guy to the last guy. And they are pretty liberal with allowing small gaps. Another point if you crash or flat in the last 1k you also get the same time as the peloton. These rules were added to protect the riders and reduce the insanity at the finish line. It's bad enough just for the guys trying for the win.

Now on mountain finishes time gaps are awarded on very small splits and it is not uncommon to pick up a second or two even mid pack. Again it all has to do with safety. On a mtn finish you don't have the high speeds, people jostling to get onto wheels for a lead out or large speed differentials as someone pulling off a leadout and slowing is overtaken by others just kicking their sprints.
Paniolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:04 AM.