new to bike racing
07-09-09, 06:42 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 144
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
new to bike racing
never been into the tdf but thanks to versus I'm hooked. What makes no sense to me is when the hole group finishes they all get the same time. Is this true? No form of racing is like this so it's just weird to me.
07-09-09, 06:48 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,881
Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 766 Post(s)
Liked 1,739 Times
in
1,013 Posts
07-09-09, 06:48 PM
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,957
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In the sprint stages its a whole heck of alot safer to just give everyone the same time than to have 100 riders clawing at each other for additonal seconds.
The mountains will yield massive time gaps. The flats, not so much.
The mountains will yield massive time gaps. The flats, not so much.
07-09-09, 06:50 PM
#4
Cycler
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,499
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Yes it's true, and it's probably the first thing that's asked about by most people watching the Tour for the 1st time. There are a couple of reasons;
1. To avoid a mad scramble by everyone to gain a second at the end and putting everyone in a dangerous situation in a pack of nearly 200 riders.
2. The difficulty of separating everyone individually to the fraction of a second. Actually this could be done today with electronic timing.
It's generally conceded that everyone finishing in a "group" will get the time of that group. Later in the mountain stages, you'll see riders split by just a few seconds and they will take that into account in the overall timing. I know, it's weird, but not when you've been watching bike racing for 35 years...it's just "normal."
1. To avoid a mad scramble by everyone to gain a second at the end and putting everyone in a dangerous situation in a pack of nearly 200 riders.
2. The difficulty of separating everyone individually to the fraction of a second. Actually this could be done today with electronic timing.
It's generally conceded that everyone finishing in a "group" will get the time of that group. Later in the mountain stages, you'll see riders split by just a few seconds and they will take that into account in the overall timing. I know, it's weird, but not when you've been watching bike racing for 35 years...it's just "normal."
07-09-09, 06:54 PM
#6
Cycler
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,499
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
07-09-09, 07:27 PM
#9
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
The standard I've heard is two bicycle length gap (of at least one second). In practice, it's rare for there to be a difference of less than 5 seconds between groups though.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
07-10-09, 10:29 AM
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Actually it seems to have a lot to do with why there is a split. They seem to not want to count a split that is happening just because of the random patern of a gap when riders are sitting up and coasting over the line.
