Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Professional Cycling For the Fans Follow the Tour de France,the Giro de Italia, the Spring Classics, or other professional cycling races? Here's your home...

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-31-09, 09:54 AM   #1
Farby
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NY
Bikes:
Posts: 642
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
astarloza tests positive

http://tour-de-france.velonews.com/a...r-epo-uci-says
Farby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 10:05 AM   #2
monosierra
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 450
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Oh no....the floodgates are open!!
monosierra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 10:18 AM   #3
Ratfish
Senior Member
 
Ratfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MÍlťe Island
Bikes:
Posts: 1,016
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Isn't this the same old test as before? Why did he think he could get through?
Ratfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 10:24 AM   #4
fauxto nick
Cat 3 Meter - Don't Care
 
fauxto nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Bikes:
Posts: 3,893
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
ASStarandfeatherthisLOSER.

Fixed.
fauxto nick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 10:25 AM   #5
pathdoc
Hey let's ride.
 
pathdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Allen, TX
Bikes: Torelli road bike, Tsunami tandem
Posts: 2,002
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Bummer. I hate to hear this.
pathdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 10:31 AM   #6
hocker
Senior Member
 
hocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Denver
Bikes: Road and Mountain
Posts: 619
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Not good for Euskaltel Euskadi. They didn't get an invite to the Giro this year and now this. We were all wondering who Team Sky and Radio Shack would replace at next years Tour.
hocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 10:33 AM   #7
Garthr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: where
Bikes: Franklin Frames Custom, Rivendell Bombadil
Posts: 1,289
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Floodgates? . . . nah, just a drop in the bucket so far. The big loser could be the Euskaltel-Euskadi team. Two failed tests don't go well with sponsors.


Then again . . who trusts the crooked UCI? I for one don't.
Garthr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 10:39 AM   #8
raptor3x
Senior Member
 
raptor3x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 175
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
They've really just completely given up on the whole "wait for the B sample before reporting thing", haven't they?
raptor3x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 10:46 AM   #9
OrionKhan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SoCal
Bikes:
Posts: 1,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Not surprised. Not disappointed. Don't even care anymore. Next topic of discussion.
OrionKhan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 10:47 AM   #10
hocker
Senior Member
 
hocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Denver
Bikes: Road and Mountain
Posts: 619
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by raptor3x View Post
They've really just completely given up on the whole "wait for the B sample before reporting thing", haven't they?
Good point raptor! +1
IMO it is irresponsible to report anything to the press before the B sample... ridiculous. And, if he tested positive before the Tour, why was he allowed to ride it? It's like the UCI baits these cheaters, puffs-up its chest and yells "I gotcha", all proud like after the Tour. But, I guess it is better than baseball given MLB waited six years and two championships (BoSox) to release results.
hocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 10:51 AM   #11
Garthr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: where
Bikes: Franklin Frames Custom, Rivendell Bombadil
Posts: 1,289
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by raptor3x View Post
They've really just completely given up on the whole "wait for the B sample before reporting thing", haven't they?
Yes. The UCI break their own rules every time. They have once again announced a failed "A" sample", against their own rules or procedure. They have lost all credibility to me. It's a Kangaroo Court of what's becoming a Kangaroo Sport.

With McQuaid in for 4 more years . . . it's looking woeful.
Garthr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 10:53 AM   #12
Garthr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: where
Bikes: Franklin Frames Custom, Rivendell Bombadil
Posts: 1,289
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Read this article from the Landis case . . . for those that don't know . It explains what is supposed to happen in these cases.

http://velonews.com/article/10679
Garthr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 10:53 AM   #13
fauxto nick
Cat 3 Meter - Don't Care
 
fauxto nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Bikes:
Posts: 3,893
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
In the words of Jay Z "What you eat don't make me ****". I'm getting to the point that it all doesn't matter, the drama is sort of fun/funny. I watch the TDF it pumps me up to wage my own little battles on the road. Then the dopers are popped and everything is corrected, oh well. At least we get new social pariahs every year.
fauxto nick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 11:03 AM   #14
monosierra
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 450
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
"All 181 riders tested positive; Massive cover-up revealed"
monosierra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 11:15 AM   #15
julian
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: julian, ca
Bikes:
Posts: 598
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by raptor3x View Post
They've really just completely given up on the whole "wait for the B sample before reporting thing", haven't they?
No the article stated he could request to be present for testing of the B sample. Hey in this country people are fingered before they go to trial and are found guilty. What is the difference?

I feel bad about this. I was happy to see him win a stage for the first time in his life. He really was emotional about his win.
julian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 11:31 AM   #16
Garthr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: where
Bikes: Franklin Frames Custom, Rivendell Bombadil
Posts: 1,289
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The difference is the UCI has a clear set of rules for how these cases are to be handled. They break them every time.

Quote from the Velo News Article:

Once the A Sample tests positive, the UCIís Anti-Doping Commission notifies the riderís National Federation, the riderís National Anti-Doping Organization, and WADA. In addition, the Anti-Doping Commission may send a copy of the notification to the rider and or the riderís team. The rider, the riderís National Federation, and the Anti-Doping Commission are all entitled to demand analysis of the B Sample. If the B Sample is negative, the entire test shall be considered negative. If, on the other hand, the B Sample tests positive, or if no request to test the B Sample is made, the findings shall be reported to the rider, his National Federation, his National Anti-Doping Organization, and to WADA. The riderís team may also be notified.

Under UCI Rules, ďpublic disclosure shall be made by the Anti-Doping Commission or the National FederationĒ after the B Sample tests positive. Furthermore, UCI Rules require that

License-Holders who are asserted to have committed a violation of these Anti-Doping Rules shall in principle not be publicly identified until it has been determined [at a hearing] that an anti-doping violation has occurred. However, the Anti-Doping Commission and the National Federation of the License-Holder who is asserted to have committed a violation of these Anti-Doping rules may make public statements and identifications they deem appropriate under the circumstances, but not earlier than sending the notification [requesting a disciplinary hearing].



Once again, they condemn the rider before the "B" sample. It's a Kangaroo system.
Garthr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 12:53 PM   #17
julian
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: julian, ca
Bikes:
Posts: 598
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garthr View Post
The difference is the UCI has a clear set of rules for how these cases are to be handled. They break them every time.

Quote from the Velo News Article:

Once the A Sample tests positive, the UCIís Anti-Doping Commission notifies the riderís National Federation, the riderís National Anti-Doping Organization, and WADA. In addition, the Anti-Doping Commission may send a copy of the notification to the rider and or the riderís team. The rider, the riderís National Federation, and the Anti-Doping Commission are all entitled to demand analysis of the B Sample. If the B Sample is negative, the entire test shall be considered negative. If, on the other hand, the B Sample tests positive, or if no request to test the B Sample is made, the findings shall be reported to the rider, his National Federation, his National Anti-Doping Organization, and to WADA. The riderís team may also be notified.

Under UCI Rules, ďpublic disclosure shall be made by the Anti-Doping Commission or the National FederationĒ after the B Sample tests positive. Furthermore, UCI Rules require that

License-Holders who are asserted to have committed a violation of these Anti-Doping Rules shall in principle not be publicly identified until it has been determined [at a hearing] that an anti-doping violation has occurred. However, the Anti-Doping Commission and the National Federation of the License-Holder who is asserted to have committed a violation of these Anti-Doping rules may make public statements and identifications they deem appropriate under the circumstances, but not earlier than sending the notification [requesting a disciplinary hearing].



Once again, they condemn the rider before the "B" sample. It's a Kangaroo system.
Who let the cat out of the bag? It seems like only the UCI is under a gag order. It seems like a lot of other organizations are notified. Are they under a gag order too?
julian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 01:18 PM   #18
lotek
Forum Admin
 
lotek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: n.w. superdrome
Bikes: 1 trek, serotta, rih, de Reus, Pogliaghi and finally a Zieleman! and got a DeRosa
Posts: 17,713
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
I wondered the same thing about UCI and the rule about not releasing the rider information.
I asked on another forum and no, they are following the guidelines.
excerpted from:
PART 14 ANTI-DOPING RULES OF THE UCI (new version effective as of January 1, 2009)
http://www.uci.ch/Modules/BUILTIN/ge...c3MDk&LangId=1

206. If the initial review under article 204 does not reveal an applicable Therapeutic Use Exemption or
apparent departure from these Anti-Doping Rules, the Procedural Guidelines, the International Standard
for Testing or the International Standard for Laboratories that caused the Adverse Analytical Finding, the UCI shall promptly notify the Rider of (a) the Adverse Analytical Finding; (b) the Rider’s right to the
analysis of the B Sample under the conditions of these Anti-Doping Rules; (c) the scheduled date, time
and place for the B Sample analysis; (d) the opportunity for the Rider and/or the Rider’s representative to attend the B Sample opening and analysis; and (e) the Rider’s right to request copies of the A and B
Sample laboratory documentation package which includes information as required by the International
Standard for Laboratories.
When the UCI is satisfied that the Rider has been notified, a copy of the notification is sent to the Rider’s National Federation and National Anti-Doping Organization and to WADA.
A copy may also be sent to the Rider’s club or team.

351. UCI may publish reports showing the name of each Rider tested and the date of each Testing.
352. The identity of a License-Holder who may have committed an anti-doping rule violation may be publicly disclosed by the UCI after notice has been provided to the License-Holder under article 206 or, where no Adverse Analytical Finding is involved, under article 249.
__________________
Sono piý lento di quel che sembra.
Odio la gente, tutti.


Want to upgrade your membership? Click Here.
lotek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 02:17 PM   #19
HigherGround
Descends Like Avalanche
 
HigherGround's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Somewhere between Funkytown and Margaritaville, PA
Bikes: Lynskey R330, Litespeed Classic, Eddy Merckx MX Leader, Specialized Rock Hopper Comp (1988!)
Posts: 5,767
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I wish they had taken action before he started the Tour and won a stage. (Assuming the B-sample confirms doping occurred.)
__________________
The rider in my avatar is David Etxebarria, not me.
HigherGround is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 02:25 PM   #20
rogwilco
snob
 
rogwilco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vienna
Bikes:
Posts: 1,178
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Oh well, too bad. I was impressed by the guy in the Tour de France, but what can you do...
rogwilco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 02:36 PM   #21
Ratfish
Senior Member
 
Ratfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MÍlťe Island
Bikes:
Posts: 1,016
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
How could they take action before if they just got the result? Time travel? Pretty sure there is more science than pissing on a stick that shows a blue + sign if they dope.
Ratfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 02:56 PM   #22
lotek
Forum Admin
 
lotek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: n.w. superdrome
Bikes: 1 trek, serotta, rih, de Reus, Pogliaghi and finally a Zieleman! and got a DeRosa
Posts: 17,713
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
the first test (A sample) was positive. we haven't heard about the B sample.
the sample was taken June 26th out of competition.
__________________
Sono piý lento di quel che sembra.
Odio la gente, tutti.


Want to upgrade your membership? Click Here.
lotek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 03:16 PM   #23
Garthr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: where
Bikes: Franklin Frames Custom, Rivendell Bombadil
Posts: 1,289
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by julian View Post
Who let the cat out of the bag? It seems like only the UCI is under a gag order. It seems like a lot of other organizations are notified. Are they under a gag order too?
Well . . .it was the UCI that made the announcement after all.


Anyways . . . . I guess I'm off on a tangent today . . . as I don't care who takes what and when. I say let them dope all day every day . . . and may the best dope win . . . as if this hasn't been the case anyways
Garthr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 03:51 PM   #24
challaday
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Just this side of insanity.
Bikes: Too many
Posts: 574
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Astarloza tests positive for EPO

Just when you thought the tour was clean.

http://tour-de-france.velonews.com/a...r-epo-uci-says
challaday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-09, 03:53 PM   #25
ElJamoquio
Burning Matches.
 
ElJamoquio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Bikes: Motobecane Le Champion SL, Cervelo P2SL
Posts: 9,673
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 454 Post(s)
Wow! Breaking Story! Thanks for keeping me up to date.


P.S. - you think there are other dopers in the peloton?
__________________
Reacting is mind candy; it requires no thought. Thinking is tedious.

Bikeforums 'Group Buy': Kinlin Rims, Sapim/DT Spokes, Formula/Bitex Hubs


"The only good race pace is suicide pace, and today looks like a good day to die."
-Steve Prefontaine
ElJamoquio is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:52 AM.