Lance Armstrong = Giant ******?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 450
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Lance Armstrong = Giant ******?
I'm fairly neutral over LA as a person. He is a terrific bike rider, and a force of good for some causes. But this is an interesting blog article that summarizes the whole LA/AC thing, plus insightful comments into the 'accusations' thrown by the Spanish press. The blogger, an LA supporter, is even-handed and objective in his analysis:
Lance Armstrong = Giant ******?
(NSFW ads, apparently)
Lance Armstrong = Giant ******?
(NSFW ads, apparently)
Last edited by monosierra; 08-04-09 at 09:11 AM.
#2
Senior Member
An article (blog?) written by a nobody who is a Lance hater.....no new news there
__________________
BMC Roadmachine
Kona Jake the Snake
BMC Roadmachine
Kona Jake the Snake
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 450
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Take for instance the water bottle incident, when LA intercepted a bottle that a Caisse rider was trying to pass to AC. The author noted that this could have been innocent on LA's part, although skipping the dinner later was 'classless'.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Right where I'm supposed to be
Posts: 1,634
Bikes: Franklin Frames Custom, Rivendell Bombadil
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Liked 209 Times
in
127 Posts
Well you see . . . opinions of LA are truly a mirror to your personal beliefs. Did he do this ? Did he do that? Do I care what he does to X and not to Y? On and on it goes.
The joke's on all of us. He's just another human being . . like you and me. Everyone's sh!! stinks.
We're all Right. . . and We're all Wrong.
The joke's on all of us. He's just another human being . . like you and me. Everyone's sh!! stinks.
We're all Right. . . and We're all Wrong.
#5
Certifiable Bike "Expert"
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,647
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well you see . . . opinions of LA are truly a mirror to your personal beliefs. Did he do this ? Did he do that? Do I care what he does to X and not to Y? On and on it goes.
The joke's on all of us. He's just another human being . . like you and me. Everyone's sh!! stinks.
We're all Right. . . and We're all Wrong.
The joke's on all of us. He's just another human being . . like you and me. Everyone's sh!! stinks.
We're all Right. . . and We're all Wrong.
Is this really your belief?
#6
Light Makes Right
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Green Mountain, Colorado
Posts: 1,520
Bikes: Gianni Motta Criterium, Dean Hardtail
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Heck, I don't need no stinkin' article. I know the truth from BikeForums.net: there is no Lance, only Satan.
#7
Light Makes Right
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Green Mountain, Colorado
Posts: 1,520
Bikes: Gianni Motta Criterium, Dean Hardtail
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
LOL - Mother Theresa, Pol Pot and Lance Armstrong. And here I thought Lance was just a dude who gets paid to pedal around on a bike!
#8
SWS: Small Wheel Syndrome
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 728
Bikes: Bike Friday Pocket Rocket/PedalForce RS2/Specialized Rock Hopper Xtracycle/Periscope Hammerhead
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Lance is the Shooter McGavin of cycling.
LA:
"I eat pieces of sh*t like you for breakfast!"
AC:
"You eat pieces of sh*t?"
LA:
"I eat pieces of sh*t like you for breakfast!"
AC:
"You eat pieces of sh*t?"
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 2,104
Bikes: Too many to count
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
That article was far from a negative article against Armstrong. I don't think you read much of it. There isn't so much opinion against Armstrong as there is objective reports on articles that were already published. Armstrong put his own foot in his mouth. He didn't need any help from the writer of that article.
#10
Senior Member
#11
insert witty comment here
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 846
Bikes: 2016 Specialized AWOL, 2011 Electra Bike Ticino, '09 Trek 7.2 FX, Peugeot UE 18
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am neither a fan boy nor an LA hater and I think it was a good article, well worth the read. In fact I really like LA and AC as athletes but I don't want to hang out with either of them. Like Terrell Owens, I like him on the field but he is not invited to my birthday parties.
My favorite line in this article is:
"The real question is why didn't Bruyneel have control over his team?"
Had Bruynell controlled his team he'd be rich and winning many more le Tours the next 5 years. As is he'll just be plenty rich.
My favorite line in this article is:
"The real question is why didn't Bruyneel have control over his team?"
Had Bruynell controlled his team he'd be rich and winning many more le Tours the next 5 years. As is he'll just be plenty rich.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 450
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#13
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The author even says he roots for Lance. The title has a question mark, which softens it a bit. I do think its interesting to see a perspective on events that is different from the normal coverage we get in the United States.
I personally am a fan of Lance, and think he is a team guy. However I do see the point that in his wins, he asked everyone to sacrifice for him, and his result was the only thing that mattered. That same philosophy didn't extend to Contador this year. I don't remember him ever trying to get Floyd, Tyler, George, Levi, Roberto, or any of his domestiques on the podium.
The water bottle thing is possibly a bit overblown. I know Lance has said numerous times you have to watch your food and water supplies, to make sure people don't try to poison or plant drugs in your system. I would assume the water bottle incident was due to this reason.
Either way, I support Lance, but I think its good to see a different perspective on things sometimes.
I personally am a fan of Lance, and think he is a team guy. However I do see the point that in his wins, he asked everyone to sacrifice for him, and his result was the only thing that mattered. That same philosophy didn't extend to Contador this year. I don't remember him ever trying to get Floyd, Tyler, George, Levi, Roberto, or any of his domestiques on the podium.
The water bottle thing is possibly a bit overblown. I know Lance has said numerous times you have to watch your food and water supplies, to make sure people don't try to poison or plant drugs in your system. I would assume the water bottle incident was due to this reason.
Either way, I support Lance, but I think its good to see a different perspective on things sometimes.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 450
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 211
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I dont think he tried to get any of his domestiques on the podium, but what team does. Most of them have no shot at getting on the podium anyway. He tried to let Floyd win a stage after doing all the work for him, but floyd couldnt so he ended up winning it in the sprint. At the end of the tour though he always split his earnings evengly throughout his riders rewarding for their hardwork, so I think he is a team guy.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 675
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Good and fair from my perspective. It restates some posts or ideas from online forums, almost verbatim. I would guess that the author has been reading and or contributing on here or cyclingnews.
Long live Sir Lance-a-lot to learn. Retweeted.
Long live Sir Lance-a-lot to learn. Retweeted.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,957
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
We hate lance thread recipe...
place obligatory nameless blog as proof here _________________ because if its on the interwebz it must be true
place obligatory previous love here _____________________ so as to justify why everyone who still likes him is wrong
place final straw here ______________________ so as to justify your new found/continued lance hatred.
Mix in any order you would like, add ******* or ******** or *** for flavor
Click mouse and wait anywhere from 15-25 minutes for appropriate responses.
enjoy, rinse, repeat
place obligatory nameless blog as proof here _________________ because if its on the interwebz it must be true
place obligatory previous love here _____________________ so as to justify why everyone who still likes him is wrong
place final straw here ______________________ so as to justify your new found/continued lance hatred.
Mix in any order you would like, add ******* or ******** or *** for flavor
Click mouse and wait anywhere from 15-25 minutes for appropriate responses.
enjoy, rinse, repeat
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 450
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
We hate lance thread recipe...
place obligatory nameless blog as proof here _________________ because if its on the interwebz it must be true
place obligatory previous love here _____________________ so as to justify why everyone who still likes him is wrong
place final straw here ______________________ so as to justify your new found/continued lance hatred.
Mix in any order you would like, add ******* or ******** or *** for flavor
Click mouse and wait anywhere from 15-25 minutes for appropriate responses.
enjoy, rinse, repeat
place obligatory nameless blog as proof here _________________ because if its on the interwebz it must be true
place obligatory previous love here _____________________ so as to justify why everyone who still likes him is wrong
place final straw here ______________________ so as to justify your new found/continued lance hatred.
Mix in any order you would like, add ******* or ******** or *** for flavor
Click mouse and wait anywhere from 15-25 minutes for appropriate responses.
enjoy, rinse, repeat
And read the blog before posting, please.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,957
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You used the word blogger, even handed and objective in the same sentence. There isnt a blogger on the planet that is all 3 of those things ever.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: silicon valley
Posts: 1,774
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That article was far from a negative article against Armstrong. I don't think you read much of it. There isn't so much opinion against Armstrong as there is objective reports on articles that were already published. Armstrong put his own foot in his mouth. He didn't need any help from the writer of that article.
https://www.bikeforums.net/professional-cycling-fans/570225-did-your-opinion-armstrong-change-tour.html
the trend tells me that many more people view lance negatively since he made his "comeback". i know for me that's the case, as well as almost everyone i know.
the twitter war between AC and LA gets mentioned alot too and since only lance and his employees and buddies were tweeting that's gotta tell you something.
ed rader
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: silicon valley
Posts: 1,774
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
https://www.cyclingnews.com/features/...w-in-context-2
ed rader
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 450
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,957
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#25
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 751
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
objectivity makes lance look bad. check out the results of this poll.........
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=570225
the trend tells me that many more people view lance negatively since he made his "comeback". i know for me that's the case, as well as almost everyone i know.
the twitter war between AC and LA gets mentioned alot too and since only lance and his employees and buddies were tweeting that's gotta tell you something.
ed rader
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=570225
the trend tells me that many more people view lance negatively since he made his "comeback". i know for me that's the case, as well as almost everyone i know.
the twitter war between AC and LA gets mentioned alot too and since only lance and his employees and buddies were tweeting that's gotta tell you something.
ed rader
This whole Lance / AC Rivalry is just a ploy to get people watching. It worked, many more people watched...and many more will watch next year ;P