Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Professional Cycling For the Fans Follow the Tour de France,the Giro de Italia, the Spring Classics, or other professional cycling races? Here's your home...

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-12-10, 09:28 AM   #1
Roadierookie
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Roadierookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 92
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Why is Floyd not being charged with fraud?

Now that we know for sure that Landis was a cheat, why is he not being charged for fraud. He raised money for his defense from supporters who believed he was innocent and now that he has come clean, has he not committed fraud to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars? Has he struck a deal with someone?
Roadierookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-10, 09:34 AM   #2
TomT74
Senior Member
 
TomT74's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SE Michigan
Bikes: 2010 Windsor Tourist, 2004 Custom SWB Recumbent, Unicycle, and a pile of pieces
Posts: 144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
He's turning State's evidence perhaps. That could get him immunity
TomT74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-10, 10:51 AM   #3
LowCel 
Throw the stick!!!!
 
LowCel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Bikes: GMC Denali
Posts: 17,588
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomT74 View Post
He's turning State's evidence perhaps. That could get him immunity
Plus I believe he is still saying that he didn't dope when he won the tour.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
LowCel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-10, 02:55 PM   #4
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Bikes:
Posts: 3,214
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadierookie View Post
Now that we know for sure that Landis was a cheat, why is he not being charged for fraud. He raised money for his defense from supporters who believed he was innocent and now that he has come clean, has he not committed fraud to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars? Has he struck a deal with someone?
At some point, you're really going to have to become acquainted with the facts. You might start with what Landis did and did not admit to.
asgelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-10, 03:34 PM   #5
Hezz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 1,649
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by asgelle View Post
At some point, you're really going to have to become acquainted with the facts. You might start with what Landis did and did not admit to.
Well said.
Hezz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-10, 07:02 PM   #6
Roadierookie
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Roadierookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 92
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by asgelle View Post
At some point, you're really going to have to become acquainted with the facts. You might start with what Landis did and did not admit to.
OK, please inform me what he did and did not admit to then.
Roadierookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-10, 07:11 PM   #7
Hezz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 1,649
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadierookie View Post
OK, please inform me what he did and did not admit to then.
Floyd has admitted to using systematic doping of various substances during his career but in the case of the 2006 TDF he says that he was only using HGH. The positive test found him out of balance in his testosterone/epitesterone. The media is still falsly reporting that he had high testosterone but the reality was that his epitesterone was lower than normal. Which can indicate doping. Since he knew that he hadn't been using testosterone in that time period he knew that something was wrong with the testing so he believed that he could justifiably challenge the test. After all, they had been getting by the drug test for years and they knew that they were not infallible.

Now I think that there is some grounds to disbelieve this. But there is also some grounds to believe it. And there were a lot of flaws found in the testing.
Hezz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-10, 06:00 AM   #8
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Bikes:
Posts: 3,214
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadierookie View Post
OK, please inform me what he did and did not admit to then.
Who started this thread? Listen first, speak second; not the other way around.
asgelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-10, 08:18 AM   #9
bellweatherman
Senior Member
 
bellweatherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin
Bikes: Too many to count
Posts: 2,103
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Landis is not being charged with fraud because it was Armstrong who committed the fraud, tampering, theft of governmental funds during their time on US Postal Team. Plus, as much as it's going to cause a lot of buttocks hurt amongst the Armstrong supporters, Landis has more credibility than Armstrong. Yes, a past liar and cheat having more credibility than a current liar and cheat.
bellweatherman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-10, 10:23 AM   #10
Staarkhand
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 145
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yeah, Landis has stuck to certain denials. Cynically you can say just to avoid perjury charges.

Landis defrauded fans while in the role of some random guy. Lance defrauded the US government while arguably being part of a team ownership. I'm not a lawyer or familiar enough with the details to know if there's a case against Landis or not, but that is the primary difference.
Staarkhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-10, 10:23 AM   #11
collegeskier
Senior Member
 
collegeskier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Evanston, IL
Bikes: Felt F5, Fuji Robaix Pro and a KHS Mountain Bike
Posts: 817
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bellweatherman View Post
Landis is not being charged with fraud because it was Armstrong who committed the fraud, tampering, theft of governmental funds during their time on US Postal Team. Plus, as much as it's going to cause a lot of buttocks hurt amongst the Armstrong supporters, Landis has more credibility than Armstrong. Yes, a past liar and cheat having more credibility than a current liar and cheat.
Couple of things,
1) I think they are saying Landis defrauded the public into giving to his defense fund and buying a non-fiction book that was of course fiction.
2) That has nothing to do with Lance.
3) I think even for you, to say that Lance stole government funds is a little over the top. Even if I conceded that he defrauded the government, which I don't doped to the gills or clean as a whistle, they got what they paid for and more. Fraud and theft are not the same.
4) Just to show I am no Lance Fanboy, he is guilty of intimidation through sport.
collegeskier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-10, 06:36 PM   #12
bellweatherman
Senior Member
 
bellweatherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin
Bikes: Too many to count
Posts: 2,103
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It has a lot to do with Armstrong. The accusations, based on the Nightline interview speak of Armstrong. There are sections of the book, where Floyd alluded to doping. However, nobody has been charged yet. Not even Armstrong, though there are rumblings that other former teammates and employees/associates are speaking to investigators. Where there is smoke, there is fire.
bellweatherman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-10, 11:19 PM   #13
TechKnowGN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Bikes: 2009 Fuji Newest 1.0, 2011 Trek 3900 Disc MTB
Posts: 1,266
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bellweatherman View Post
Landis is not being charged with fraud because it was Armstrong who committed the fraud, tampering, theft of governmental funds during their time on US Postal Team. Plus, as much as it's going to cause a lot of buttocks hurt amongst the Armstrong supporters, Landis has more credibility than Armstrong. Yes, a past liar and cheat having more credibility than a current liar and cheat.
I get you hate Armstrong, but the point that Landis has more credibility is pure falsehood. Has lance looked guilty? plenty of times. Is he guilty? No one knows right now. But what we do know is that Landis has lied over and over again, and there are enough holes inthe current story that its entirely possible he's lying again.

You want so badly to believe Lance is guilty, that you'll take the word of a known liar whose story doesnt totally add up based on the straight up indisputable facts (specifically around the Tour de Suisse).
TechKnowGN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-10, 11:24 PM   #14
Shimagnolo
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Bikes:
Posts: 7,564
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 169 Post(s)
You don't kill the goose that is laying the golden eggs.
Shimagnolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-10, 11:56 PM   #15
bellweatherman
Senior Member
 
bellweatherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin
Bikes: Too many to count
Posts: 2,103
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechKnowGN View Post
I get you hate Armstrong, but the point that Landis has more credibility is pure falsehood. Has lance looked guilty? plenty of times. Is he guilty? No one knows right now. But what we do know is that Landis has lied over and over again, and there are enough holes inthe current story that its entirely possible he's lying again.

You want so badly to believe Lance is guilty, that you'll take the word of a known liar whose story doesnt totally add up based on the straight up indisputable facts (specifically around the Tour de Suisse).



I get the you idolize Armstrong, but saying that Armstrong has any shred of credibility after he has shown multiple times to lie, backstab, and ruin people's careers is just on the level of mancrush idolatry. The difference between Landis and Armstrong is that one is a past liar, the other is a current continual liar. There are already reports of other pro cyclists that have confirmed what Landis has said about Armstrong's doping.
bellweatherman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-10, 02:30 PM   #16
telebianchi
Senior Member
 
telebianchi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 2003 Fuji Cross, 2010 Giant Trance, 2006 K2 Mod 4.0, 2010 Schwinn Madison
Posts: 1,279
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bellweatherman View Post
I get the you idolize Armstrong, but saying that Armstrong has any shred of credibility after he has shown multiple times to lie, backstab, and ruin people's careers is just on the level of mancrush idolatry. The difference between Landis and Armstrong is that one is a past liar, the other is a current continual liar. There are already reports of other pro cyclists that have confirmed what Landis has said about Armstrong's doping.
So do you think that Landis cheated during the 2006 TdF? Or do you think that he got screwed by failures in the testing process and that Landis should still be the rightful winner? If you agree with the former, then you must also believe that Landis is a current continual liar.
telebianchi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-10, 03:39 PM   #17
Berg417448
Troublemaker
 
Berg417448's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Earth
Bikes:
Posts: 356
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bellweatherman View Post
I get the you idolize Armstrong, but saying that Armstrong has any shred of credibility after he has shown multiple times to lie, backstab, and ruin people's careers is just on the level of mancrush idolatry. The difference between Landis and Armstrong is that one is a past liar, the other is a current continual liar. There are already reports of other pro cyclists that have confirmed what Landis has said about Armstrong's doping.

Landis is still lying about his Tour positive so that makes them both "continual" liars.
Berg417448 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-10, 04:00 PM   #18
kleinboogie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 2,607
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Floyd is a flip-flopping habitual liar by his own admission. Pretty much anything he says from now on is a lie until proven otherwise. It's how you handle those kind of people. So far, he hasn't proven anything other than his ability to take money from his friends, family and supporters and mislead the world at large. I regret few things in this world, supporting him is one of them. He's sad.
kleinboogie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-10, 07:04 PM   #19
bellweatherman
Senior Member
 
bellweatherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin
Bikes: Too many to count
Posts: 2,103
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by telebianchi View Post
So do you think that Landis cheated during the 2006 TdF? Or do you think that he got screwed by failures in the testing process and that Landis should still be the rightful winner? If you agree with the former, then you must also believe that Landis is a current continual liar.

So, you are saying that once someone lies about anything, then whatever they say henceforth is also a lie. Correct?
bellweatherman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-10, 06:02 AM   #20
telebianchi
Senior Member
 
telebianchi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 2003 Fuji Cross, 2010 Giant Trance, 2006 K2 Mod 4.0, 2010 Schwinn Madison
Posts: 1,279
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bellweatherman View Post
So, you are saying that once someone lies about anything, then whatever they say henceforth is also a lie. Correct?
No, not at all. I am sure that someone who has admitted to lies in the past can and does still tell the truth. Their previous lies, however, do hurt their current credibility.

Your earlier post said: "The difference between Landis and Armstrong is that one is a past liar, the other is a current continual liar." I'm just saying that it appears that Landis is still a continual liar based on his denial of cheating in the 2006 TdF. Therefore, there is no difference on this point unless you think that Landis is telling the truth about his TdF victory.

At the same time, if LA is, according to you, a current and continual liar, does that mean that LA is incapable of telling the truth? Maybe I misunderstood your posts, but it seems like you are using different standards to judge Landis and LA on this idea of "current continual lying".

Regardless, Armstrong has nothing to do with whether or not Floyd should be sued for or charged with fraud for taking money for his legal defense fund. In response to the OPs original question, if someone who donated large amounts of money to the defense fund wanted to sue Landis for defrauding them they could take him into civil court, maybe get all the people who gave $1, $5 or$10 and turn it into a class action suit. But nobody is claiming that Floyd defrauded the US Government and therefore the Feds are not interested in pursuing a case against him.
telebianchi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-10, 12:29 PM   #21
colombo357
Senior Member
 
colombo357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 1,995
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bellweatherman View Post
So, you are saying that once someone lies about anything, then whatever they say henceforth is also a lie. Correct?
Once a liar, always a liar. That's what he IS, doesn't matter what he DOES.

Boy who cried wolf.

Last edited by colombo357; 08-15-10 at 12:34 PM.
colombo357 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-10, 07:32 PM   #22
Monte Zoncolan
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I am waiting for someone who donated money to his fund to file a civil suit. It's an open and shut case.
Monte Zoncolan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:20 AM.