Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Professional Cycling For the Fans Follow the Tour de France,the Giro de Italia, the Spring Classics, or other professional cycling races? Here's your home...

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-02-10, 09:35 PM   #1
bellweatherman
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bellweatherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin
Bikes: Too many to count
Posts: 2,103
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Andreu vs. Armstrong - new voicemail tape emerges

"Betsy Andreu has told the Los Angeles Times that US Food and Drug Administration agent Jeff Novitzky who is leading an investigation into the existence of doping in professional cycling in the US - including the specific allegations made by Floyd Landis - is in possession of voicemail recordings left on her answering machine by McIlvain.

According to Andreu, the tapes indicate that McIlvain lied when testifying during the SCA case. Andreu says the voicemails are consistent with other telephone conversations she had with McIlvain during which, according to the LA Times report, she claims McIlvain apologised to her for lying about her previous testimony."

McIlvain and Oakley probably thought that once the SCA case was over, everything would be swept up under the rug. I would say that Stephanie McIlvain is in some deep, deep doo doo. Questions abound. Did Armstrong have any contact whatsoever with her or Oakley reps to ensure her "job"? The question is now, is she going to lie to cover up a lie?

Article here:
http://road.cc/content/news/22388-an...ng-kicks-again
bellweatherman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-10, 06:20 PM   #2
Cateye
Senior Member
 
Cateye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lactate Threshold
Bikes: Orbea
Posts: 584
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
^^^^^^Dick Pound........... I didn't know you were here at BF. Are you and Greg LeMond seeing the same shink?
Cateye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-10, 09:50 PM   #3
rouleour
Senior Member
 
rouleour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ontario, California.
Bikes: '99 ONCE Giant, '08 ORCA Orbea
Posts: 288
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Johan Bruyneel...is... is that you?... Damn, BF is becoming a Monster!
rouleour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-10, 06:51 AM   #4
jamesdak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Bikes: Lynskey R265,G.L. Ventoux,Schwinn Circuit & Prologue,Kona Jake The Snake,LeMond Zurich & Tourmelet,Giordana XL Super & Antares,Trek 560 Pro Series,Puegeot U08,Bob Jackson,Fuji S12-S & Opus III,Orbea Cabestany,Bianchi Campione,Basso,AMF Hercules
Posts: 2,498
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 205 Post(s)
LOL!! Read the article and it says that this has already gone through the court process in relation to the 6th Tour win and the court found in Lance's favor! Doesn't that sort of set a precedence? To go at the same allegations would be double jeopardy would it not? I'm pretty new here and believe that many if not all the top riders cheat somehow or another. Same in all sports but someone sure comes off like a jilted lover all over this forum in relation to Lance.
jamesdak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-10, 07:06 AM   #5
Donegal
Road Nazi Hunter
 
Donegal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Slow! But Ahead of You.
Bikes: Kuota Kredo, Litespeed Vortex, Aegis Victory, Burley Tandem, Cannondale Rush
Posts: 409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Wow..........

Quote:
Originally Posted by bellweatherman View Post
"Betsy Andreu has told the Los Angeles Times that US Food and Drug Administration agent Jeff Novitzky who is leading an investigation into the existence of doping in professional cycling in the US - including the specific allegations made by Floyd Landis - is in possession of voicemail recordings left on her answering machine by McIlvain.

According to Andreu, the tapes indicate that McIlvain lied when testifying during the SCA case. Andreu says the voicemails are consistent with other telephone conversations she had with McIlvain during which, according to the LA Times report, she claims McIlvain apologised to her for lying about her previous testimony."

McIlvain and Oakley probably thought that once the SCA case was over, everything would be swept up under the rug. I would say that Stephanie McIlvain is in some deep, deep doo doo. Questions abound. Did Armstrong have any contact whatsoever with her or Oakley reps to ensure her "job"? The question is now, is she going to lie to cover up a lie?

Article here:
http://road.cc/content/news/22388-an...ng-kicks-again
Blah, Blah, BlahBlahBlah, Blah Blah. It's amazing how someone rides a few Cat3 round-de-rounds and they declare themselves a world class expert on cycling. This is not a cycling thread, wrong forum. Call Oprah, or maybe even Judge Judy, gossip forums open at 5. Yet another weak reprint from the internet.
Donegal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-10, 11:14 AM   #6
rogwilco
snob
 
rogwilco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vienna
Bikes:
Posts: 1,178
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It's pretty amusing how strongly the Armstrong groupies here are arguing against justice.
rogwilco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-10, 02:07 PM   #7
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Bikes:
Posts: 3,225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesdak View Post
LOL!! Read the article and it says that this has already gone through the court process in relation to the 6th Tour win ...
No.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesdak View Post
... and the court found in Lance's favor!
No
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesdak View Post
Doesn't that sort of set a precedence?
No
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesdak View Post
To go at the same allegations would be double jeopardy would it not?
No.
But thanks for the contribution.
asgelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-10, 02:42 PM   #8
Hezz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 1,649
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesdak View Post
LOL!! Read the article and it says that this has already gone through the court process in relation to the 6th Tour win and the court found in Lance's favor! Doesn't that sort of set a precedence? To go at the same allegations would be double jeopardy would it not? I'm pretty new here and believe that many if not all the top riders cheat somehow or another. Same in all sports but someone sure comes off like a jilted lover all over this forum in relation to Lance.
You do not understand what happened in that court proceeding. The judge ruling in Armstrong's favor was not a determination of if Lance doped or not. The judge ruled in Lance's favor because he determined that the money that was owed Lance was to be paid by the guarantor of the prize money which was an insurance company. The insurance company was trying to get out of paying because they heard that Lance may have cheated by doping.

The judge ruled that the insurance company did not have the jurisdiction or right to decide if Armstrong was the winner of the TDF and since the ruling body called the UCI considered Armstrong the winner. The insurance company did not have the jurisdiction or authority to challenge Lance's victory status.

So the court ruling in Lance's favor was not whether he doped or not but whether or not an insurance company has the right to determine if someone is the rightful winner of a professional sporting event. In essence, the judged ruled that the insurance company could not challenge the UCI's ruling that Lance was the TDF winner. And that the determination of cheating by doping remained the responsibility and authority of the UCI.

Last edited by Hezz; 09-05-10 at 02:52 PM.
Hezz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-10, 06:19 PM   #9
jamesdak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Bikes: Lynskey R265,G.L. Ventoux,Schwinn Circuit & Prologue,Kona Jake The Snake,LeMond Zurich & Tourmelet,Giordana XL Super & Antares,Trek 560 Pro Series,Puegeot U08,Bob Jackson,Fuji S12-S & Opus III,Orbea Cabestany,Bianchi Campione,Basso,AMF Hercules
Posts: 2,498
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 205 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hezz View Post
You do not understand what happened in that court proceeding. The judge ruling in Armstrong's favor was not a determination of if Lance doped or not. The judge ruled in Lance's favor because he determined that the money that was owed Lance was to be paid by the guarantor of the prize money which was an insurance company. The insurance company was trying to get out of paying because they heard that Lance may have cheated by doping.

The judge ruled that the insurance company did not have the jurisdiction or right to decide if Armstrong was the winner of the TDF and since the ruling body called the UCI considered Armstrong the winner. The insurance company did not have the jurisdiction or authority to challenge Lance's victory status.

So the court ruling in Lance's favor was not whether he doped or not but whether or not an insurance company has the right to determine if someone is the rightful winner of a professional sporting event. In essence, the judged ruled that the insurance company could not challenge the UCI's ruling that Lance was the TDF winner. And that the determination of cheating by doping remained the responsibility and authority of the UCI.
Cool Hezz, and you are right I did not know what happened just went by the article provided. What you said makes perfect sense to me. I still wonder at all the hatred towards Lance that get's displayed. Professional sports are entertainment to me it I suspect most of our top athletes cheat because that is the norm. Not saying it's right or that I like it but just what I feel goes on. If the perception is that everyone is cheating is it so wrong to go that route yourself?? I ask this even though for me it would be. I guess I just try not to judge others if I don't walk in their shoes.
jamesdak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-10, 06:21 PM   #10
jamesdak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Bikes: Lynskey R265,G.L. Ventoux,Schwinn Circuit & Prologue,Kona Jake The Snake,LeMond Zurich & Tourmelet,Giordana XL Super & Antares,Trek 560 Pro Series,Puegeot U08,Bob Jackson,Fuji S12-S & Opus III,Orbea Cabestany,Bianchi Campione,Basso,AMF Hercules
Posts: 2,498
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 205 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by asgelle View Post
No.

No

No

No.
But thanks for the contribution.
And thanks to Hezz for explaining the actual specifics of the case.
jamesdak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-10, 08:01 PM   #11
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Bikes:
Posts: 3,225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesdak View Post
And thanks to Hezz for explaining the actual specifics of the case.
Since you bothered to write out your entire post I assumed you already had ample reason to believe what you wrote was true. I was merely alerting others to your errors. If you wanted information perhaps you should have asked a question rather than posting your fanciful version of events.
asgelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-10, 01:17 AM   #12
FogVilleLad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Francisco
Bikes:
Posts: 405
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hezz View Post
The judge ruled that the insurance company did not have the jurisdiction or right to decide if Armstrong was the winner of the TDF and since the ruling body called the UCI considered Armstrong the winner. The insurance company did not have the jurisdiction or authority to challenge Lance's victory status.
Thanks for taking the time to explain this. I've only recently begun to follow professional cycling closely, but my impression is that almost all of this ground has been previously covered and that the only new element is what may be unreported income from the sale of team bikes. Any thoughts?
FogVilleLad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-10, 06:20 AM   #13
jamesdak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Bikes: Lynskey R265,G.L. Ventoux,Schwinn Circuit & Prologue,Kona Jake The Snake,LeMond Zurich & Tourmelet,Giordana XL Super & Antares,Trek 560 Pro Series,Puegeot U08,Bob Jackson,Fuji S12-S & Opus III,Orbea Cabestany,Bianchi Campione,Basso,AMF Hercules
Posts: 2,498
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 205 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by asgelle View Post
Since you bothered to write out your entire post I assumed you already had ample reason to believe what you wrote was true. I was merely alerting others to your errors. If you wanted information perhaps you should have asked a question rather than posting your fanciful version of events.
LOL!, I'm just starting to get a feel for what a touchy subject this is for so many. I'm curious as to what the truth but others seem to be following it with a passion. Oh and my comments were not meant to be "fanciful" as you put it. But with such little info in the article it just goes to show how one can interpret it their own way. No big deal though, cheers.
jamesdak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-10, 09:34 PM   #14
BengeBoy 
Senior Member
 
BengeBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Bikes: 2014 Pivot Mach 5.7 MTB, 2009 Chris Boedeker custom, 1988 Tommasini Prestige, 2007 Bill Davidson custom; 1988 Specialized Stumpjumper
Posts: 6,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Extensive new interview with Betsy Andreu.

Makes for interesting reading, if you want to know her side of the story:

http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/56...stigation.aspx
BengeBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-10, 09:37 PM   #15
BengeBoy 
Senior Member
 
BengeBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Bikes: 2014 Pivot Mach 5.7 MTB, 2009 Chris Boedeker custom, 1988 Tommasini Prestige, 2007 Bill Davidson custom; 1988 Specialized Stumpjumper
Posts: 6,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FogVilleLad View Post
Thanks for taking the time to explain this. I've only recently begun to follow professional cycling closely, but my impression is that almost all of this ground has been previously covered and that the only new element is what may be unreported income from the sale of team bikes. Any thoughts?
I read this book this spring:

http://www.amazon.com/Lance-Landis-I...4780942&sr=8-1

So far what is leaking out in the press about the Novitzky investigation is pretty much following this book, page by page.

A more condensed version is in the current Men's Journal magazine (not online). I read that story the other night -- it's a pretty comprehensive summary of the "case against Lance."
BengeBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-10, 11:58 PM   #16
FogVilleLad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Francisco
Bikes:
Posts: 405
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yeah, it seems like same old, same old except for the sale of the bikes.
FogVilleLad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-10, 08:16 PM   #17
Staarkhand
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 145
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
VN: What factored into your decision to take on someone like Lance Armstrong, and what motivates you to keep going?

BA: We didn’t decide to “take him on”. We decided not to lie for him.
These days deciding not to lie is called 'having an ax to grind'.
Staarkhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-10, 07:34 AM   #18
lotek
Forum Admin
 
lotek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: n.w. superdrome
Bikes: 1 trek, serotta, rih, de Reus, Pogliaghi and finally a Zieleman! and got a DeRosa
Posts: 17,712
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
what I'm not sure of is Betsy's testimony implicates lance using PEDS pre cancer.
How does that affect the investigation of US postal and Discovery team?
__________________
Sono pił lento di quel che sembra.
Odio la gente, tutti.


Want to upgrade your membership? Click Here.
lotek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-10, 08:02 AM   #19
BengeBoy 
Senior Member
 
BengeBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Bikes: 2014 Pivot Mach 5.7 MTB, 2009 Chris Boedeker custom, 1988 Tommasini Prestige, 2007 Bill Davidson custom; 1988 Specialized Stumpjumper
Posts: 6,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by lotek View Post
what I'm not sure of is Betsy's testimony implicates lance using PEDS pre cancer.
How does that affect the investigation of US postal and Discovery team?
I think the the important thing about Betsy's testimony is that it's not about ancient history (what happened back in the 90's, when "everyone was doing it."). It's about whether anyone committed perjury when they testified in Lance's lawsuit against SCA Promotions; and this was just a couple of years ago (2007?). Lance was suing to get his Tour de France bonus ($5M), and Betsy testified that he had admitted using PEDs while in the hospital. She said that Stephanie McIlvain would corroborate her story, but under oath, Stephanie didn't. Allegedly, there are tapes of Stephanie admitting, in voicemails to Greg Lemond and Betsy Andreu, that she lied. The implication is that her employer (Oakley) persuaded her *not* to testify against Lance, or that Lance pressured her directly.

So: was Stephanie telling the truth when she left voicemails saying she witnessed the PEDS conversation? Or was she telling the truth when she testified -- she can't have it both ways.

It's seems to me that this is useful to the prosecutors because it's recent; it occurred on U.S. soil; and it's worth going after. Even if you don't care about Lance doping, surely you would care about wealthy athletes putting pressure on people to change their testimony in a legal case. I think this is a case of the prosecutors going after the "coverup" even if they can't go after the "crime."

Last edited by BengeBoy; 09-20-10 at 09:10 AM.
BengeBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-10, 10:59 AM   #20
Hezz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 1,649
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesdak View Post
Cool Hezz, and you are right I did not know what happened just went by the article provided. What you said makes perfect sense to me. I still wonder at all the hatred towards Lance that get's displayed. Professional sports are entertainment to me it I suspect most of our top athletes cheat because that is the norm. Not saying it's right or that I like it but just what I feel goes on. If the perception is that everyone is cheating is it so wrong to go that route yourself?? I ask this even though for me it would be. I guess I just try not to judge others if I don't walk in their shoes.
Thanks for your response jamesdak. I myself did not understand the nature of this case for a long time either.

In a way the judge was able to sidestep the real issue of if Lance doped or not. Most likely because he knew that this case was a can of worms that could set a precedent which would cause problems for sports in the long run if any agency owing money to a professional sports winner could withhold if they thought or heard rumors of cheating. It could also flood the legal system with expensive and difficult to determine lawsuits.

The reason for much of the Armstrong hate is that many long time cycling fans have studied cycling and Armstrong in detail over years. Reading many books with insider information. What they come to discover is that the media representation of Armstrong is very much distorted.

It is starting to become clear that Armstrong not only used performance enhancing drugs in a long term and systematic way but that he used his influence and financial power to destroy others who sought to tell the truth about the inner sanctums of cycling. So Armstrong may not just be a doper, but in fact, a criminal.
Hezz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-10, 11:14 AM   #21
Cateye
Senior Member
 
Cateye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lactate Threshold
Bikes: Orbea
Posts: 584
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogwilco View Post
It's pretty amusing how strongly the Armstrong groupies here are arguing against justice.
It's pretty amusing how strongly the Armstrong haters here are arguing against innocence without proof.
Cateye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-10, 11:19 AM   #22
Hezz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 1,649
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cateye View Post
It's pretty amusing how strongly the Armstrong haters here are arguing against innocence without proof.
It is more amusing that you think there is no proof.
Hezz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-10, 12:24 PM   #23
Cateye
Senior Member
 
Cateye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lactate Threshold
Bikes: Orbea
Posts: 584
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Show the proof.
Cateye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-10, 02:36 PM   #24
Cat4Lifer
Velo Club La Grange
 
Cat4Lifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: MDR, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 1,215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by lotek View Post
what I'm not sure of is Betsy's testimony implicates lance using PEDS pre cancer.
How does that affect the investigation of US postal and Discovery team?
Good question.
Cat4Lifer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-10, 10:16 AM   #25
lotek
Forum Admin
 
lotek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: n.w. superdrome
Bikes: 1 trek, serotta, rih, de Reus, Pogliaghi and finally a Zieleman! and got a DeRosa
Posts: 17,712
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
I'm not saying he is or isn't guilty of perjury or use of PEDS. I just wondered if Betsy's testimony is germane to the case that Novitsky is working.
And as far as I can tell, her testimony had nothing to do with the SCA claim that lance doped to win his 6 tours.
__________________
Sono pił lento di quel che sembra.
Odio la gente, tutti.


Want to upgrade your membership? Click Here.
lotek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 AM.