ruh roh Lance
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 295
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
ruh roh Lance
https://velonews.competitor.com/2011/...sterone_174866
I would have gotten away with it, if it wasn't you you pesky kids.
I would have gotten away with it, if it wasn't you you pesky kids.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 2,104
Bikes: Too many to count
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
So what if hincapie is coming clean. He gets no more credibility points than Hamilton or Landis. Hincapie has always denied doping. Now, he flips his story and says that Armstrong supplied himself and others with EPO and testosterone?
Hincapie's career is about up. He is just seeking money like the other accusers. He is bitter and washed up.
Hincapie's career is about up. He is just seeking money like the other accusers. He is bitter and washed up.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,513 Times
in
2,856 Posts
So what if hincapie is coming clean. He gets no more credibility points than Hamilton or Landis. Hincapie has always denied doping. Now, he flips his story and says that Armstrong supplied himself and others with EPO and testosterone?
Hincapie's career is about up. He is just seeking money like the other accusers. He is bitter and washed up.
Hincapie's career is about up. He is just seeking money like the other accusers. He is bitter and washed up.
Oh yes, telling the world your career has been a fraud, and exposing yourself to criminal charges is the way to money.
#4
Upgrading my engine
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alamogordo
Posts: 6,218
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So what if hincapie is coming clean. He gets no more credibility points than Hamilton or Landis. Hincapie has always denied doping. Now, he flips his story and says that Armstrong supplied himself and others with EPO and testosterone?
Hincapie's career is about up. He is just seeking money like the other accusers. He is bitter and washed up.
Hincapie's career is about up. He is just seeking money like the other accusers. He is bitter and washed up.
#5
Cervelo R3
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 171
Bikes: Cervelo R3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a world of respect for Hincapie and appreciate his honesty. Anyone not burying their head in the sand knows the doping abuse in the sport and its good to see people coming forward so we can all move onward
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,407
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah, I don't really see what George had to gain personally by this thing. He's the first truly credible witness who's come forward on this. I think it just proves the pressure that a federal investigation has on people in their personal decisions. I think most riders realized quickly that it was no joke and had to come clean, or else. With that much pressure, some were going to come clean, and those who didn't (and lied to the court) were bound to find themselves in a tight spot.
I've cheered my fair share for Lance through the years, but it's time for him to suck it up and be honest with us. It would be shameful for him to continue fighting when it's pretty obvious that it's over for him. Some fell gracefully, and others not so gracefully. George may have been dishonest for a long time but coming clean like this is leagues more classy than Lance's arrogant dishonesty. Still curious to see what this will mean for the remaining ex-US Postal guys who have yet to be caught for their almost certain involvement during those years as well.
All in all, I still think it's going to be good for the sport, and am somberly happy to see it finally going down like this. I think this is especially true after the Contador thing is being handled so strangely.
-Jeremy
I've cheered my fair share for Lance through the years, but it's time for him to suck it up and be honest with us. It would be shameful for him to continue fighting when it's pretty obvious that it's over for him. Some fell gracefully, and others not so gracefully. George may have been dishonest for a long time but coming clean like this is leagues more classy than Lance's arrogant dishonesty. Still curious to see what this will mean for the remaining ex-US Postal guys who have yet to be caught for their almost certain involvement during those years as well.
All in all, I still think it's going to be good for the sport, and am somberly happy to see it finally going down like this. I think this is especially true after the Contador thing is being handled so strangely.
-Jeremy
Last edited by Tunnelrat81; 05-20-11 at 09:10 PM.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 295
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'd have thought if he wanted fame and fortune out of coming clean he'd have gotten in on the 60 minutes action, which he declined.
If you want to continue to be a believer, that's your choice. But there is going to be more coming out of this, and at some point I've no doubt your faith will be shaken. For the rest of us it's pretty much already game set, match and introducing Lance to his new cell mate Marion.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Catawampus
Posts: 306
Bikes: Sirrus, Midnight Special (almost there)
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was all prepared to say eff you Lance, but Hincappie is denying he said anything to CBS news and that he doesn't know where they are getting their infomation.
TBD ... For now.
Later, Hincapie released a statement through his attorney: “I can confirm to you that I never spoke with `60 Minutes.’ I have no idea where they got their information. As I’ve said in the past, I continue to be disappointed that people are talking about the past in cycling instead of the future. As for the substance of anything in the `60 Minutes’ story, I cannot comment on anything relating to the ongoing investigation.”
TBD ... For now.
Later, Hincapie released a statement through his attorney: “I can confirm to you that I never spoke with `60 Minutes.’ I have no idea where they got their information. As I’ve said in the past, I continue to be disappointed that people are talking about the past in cycling instead of the future. As for the substance of anything in the `60 Minutes’ story, I cannot comment on anything relating to the ongoing investigation.”
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,513 Times
in
2,856 Posts
So "60 Minutes" has a source *other* than Hincapie himself, revealing what he said to the grand jury.
Not terribly out of the ordinary.
Not terribly out of the ordinary.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 817
Bikes: Felt F5, Fuji Robaix Pro and a KHS Mountain Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 2,104
Bikes: Too many to count
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Hincapie never spoke to 60 minutes? Duh! 60 minutes never claimed that he ever did to begin with. Sources close to Hincapie spoke to 60 minutes. What is telling is that Hincapie refuses to refute those sources.
Does it matter? Not really. Hincapie's "trustworthiness" is due to his loyalty to Armstrong over the years. His credibility was never in question until now. The truth is out there, and he is And was no more credible than any of the other former teammates of Armstrong.
Does it matter? Not really. Hincapie's "trustworthiness" is due to his loyalty to Armstrong over the years. His credibility was never in question until now. The truth is out there, and he is And was no more credible than any of the other former teammates of Armstrong.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manassas, Virginia (NoVa)
Posts: 537
Bikes: 2009 GMC DENALI (walmart bike)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wow, now that Hincapie is spilling the beans on Lance, its safe to say Lance is a cheat. And now we can confirm that Contador is even a worse cheat, and probably the rest of the pelton are just a bunch of cheats. This sport is so corrupt, there is no going back now. I always wondered how these "Climbers", never looked gassed after going miles and miles up 8%+ grades. I wonder if I messed with my blood oxygen, I could make it to the pros.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 817
Bikes: Felt F5, Fuji Robaix Pro and a KHS Mountain Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wow, now that Hincapie is spilling the beans on Lance, its safe to say Lance is a cheat. And now we can confirm that Contador is even a worse cheat, and probably the rest of the pelton are just a bunch of cheats. This sport is so corrupt, there is no going back now. I always wondered how these "Climbers", never looked gassed after going miles and miles up 8%+ grades. I wonder if I messed with my blood oxygen, I could make it to the pros.
Last edited by collegeskier; 05-20-11 at 10:17 PM. Reason: Grammar
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wadsworth, IL
Posts: 466
Bikes: Motobecane Vent Noir, Specialized Crux, Specialized Carve
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I just hope that if and when Lance is busted it doesn't ruin all of the good things he has done not just for cycling but in general.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Catawampus
Posts: 306
Bikes: Sirrus, Midnight Special (almost there)
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just saying.
If you're part of an ongoing investigation and talking to an active grand jury you should proabbly have a can of shut the F up and not be talking to the press.
Actually it does matter if someone is repeating George's testimony or speculating on what he said for that matter. It taints the entire grand jury process.
Anonymous sources are **** these days and news organizations will say and do anything to make a buck. If I had a nickle for ever time a paper dropped the anonymous source BS these days I'd be able to quit working. If your source wants to be anonymous, I say F them and wait for the Grand Jury report. There's just far too much bull**** out there anymore.
I had a teacher give me some great advised 30 years ago. Don't beleive anything you hear or read and only buy about half of what you see and you'll be fine. The rest of it is bull****. You know what? 30 years and he was pretty damn right.
Last edited by Allez3; 05-20-11 at 10:55 PM.
#17
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Because my friend, there's a world of difference between saying to some journalist ... nah no drugs for me. And lying when you're bought before a grand jury.
I'd have thought if he wanted fame and fortune out of coming clean he'd have gotten in on the 60 minutes action, which he declined.
If you want to continue to be a believer, that's your choice. But there is going to be more coming out of this, and at some point I've no doubt your faith will be shaken. For the rest of us it's pretty much already game set, match and introducing Lance to his new cell mate Marion.
I'd have thought if he wanted fame and fortune out of coming clean he'd have gotten in on the 60 minutes action, which he declined.
If you want to continue to be a believer, that's your choice. But there is going to be more coming out of this, and at some point I've no doubt your faith will be shaken. For the rest of us it's pretty much already game set, match and introducing Lance to his new cell mate Marion.
#18
Upgrading my engine
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alamogordo
Posts: 6,218
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just read between the lines of Hincapie's tweets.
Not a denial that he or Armstrong took PEDs.
Eerily similar to Mark McGwire saying "I'm not here to talk about the past."
That's a nice way of avoiding a comment, but if he never said what people are claiming he said, why wouldn't he deny it?
I don't see much of a reason to believe that he didn't actually admit to this.
I can confirm to you I never spoke with "60 Minutes." I have no idea where they got their information.
As I've said in the past, I continue to be disappointed that people are talking about the past in cycling instead of the future.
As for the substance of anything in the "60 Minutes" story, I cannot comment on anything relating to the ongoing investigation.
I don't see much of a reason to believe that he didn't actually admit to this.
#19
Here's a Quarter...
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 141
Bikes: iro phoenix
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
does everyone agree that it will be a year or more before this goes to court? is there a place to discuss legal matters?
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: La Verne CA
Posts: 5,049
Bikes: Litespeed Liege, Motorola Team Issue Eddy Mercxk, Santana Noventa Tandem, Fisher Supercaliber Mtn. Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
7 Posts
There is a huge difference between telling a white lie to a reporter which many have done for years and facing the prospect of going to prison by lying to a grand jury.
I think CBS has an insider so they had Hincapie's Grand jury testimony when they leaked the Tyler interview on Thursday.. Fully knowing that Lance would immediately give a rebuttal to anything Tyler had to say.. But what will Lance say about this, I think he says nothing..
I think CBS has an insider so they had Hincapie's Grand jury testimony when they leaked the Tyler interview on Thursday.. Fully knowing that Lance would immediately give a rebuttal to anything Tyler had to say.. But what will Lance say about this, I think he says nothing..
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
There is a huge difference between telling a white lie to a reporter which many have done for years and facing the prospect of going to prison by lying to a grand jury.
I think CBS has an insider so they had Hincapie's Grand jury testimony when they leaked the Tyler interview on Thursday.. Fully knowing that Lance would immediately give a rebuttal to anything Tyler had to say.. But what will Lance say about this, I think he says nothing..
I think CBS has an insider so they had Hincapie's Grand jury testimony when they leaked the Tyler interview on Thursday.. Fully knowing that Lance would immediately give a rebuttal to anything Tyler had to say.. But what will Lance say about this, I think he says nothing..
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 273
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
60 Minutes has its own problems
Some years ago I had a strong interest in a story 60 minutes was developing and was sort of an "insider" on the story they were reporting. A friend who was in the same situation ultimately contacted the producer of the story (whom he had worked with a few years earlier), and we showed 60 minutes that their story was wrong, or at best, seriously incomplete and one-sided. I'll never forget what the producer said after we presented all this factual information:
"That's not the story we want to tell."
So, just saying...these news shows are only peripherally interested in the truth. It's money and ratings.
"That's not the story we want to tell."
So, just saying...these news shows are only peripherally interested in the truth. It's money and ratings.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 817
Bikes: Felt F5, Fuji Robaix Pro and a KHS Mountain Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Some years ago I had a strong interest in a story 60 minutes was developing and was sort of an "insider" on the story they were reporting. A friend who was in the same situation ultimately contacted the producer of the story (whom he had worked with a few years earlier), and we showed 60 minutes that their story was wrong, or at best, seriously incomplete and one-sided. I'll never forget what the producer said after we presented all this factual information:
"That's not the story we want to tell."
So, just saying...these news shows are only peripherally interested in the truth. It's money and ratings.
"That's not the story we want to tell."
So, just saying...these news shows are only peripherally interested in the truth. It's money and ratings.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Catawampus
Posts: 306
Bikes: Sirrus, Midnight Special (almost there)
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If it bleeds is leads. Even if it isn't true. Sad state of things for sure.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North West South Carolina
Posts: 505
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I want 60 minutes to be grilled by the GJ. They llie to them and they go to JAIL. Just sayin...............................