Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910
Results 226 to 236 of 236

Thread: Tyler

  1. #226
    Senior Member bellweatherman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Austin
    My Bikes
    Too many to count
    Posts
    2,070
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah Vaughters holds a huge Ace card, but unsure if he is still chicken---- after all these years to stand up to Lance.

  2. #227
    Velo Club La Grange Cat4Lifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    MDR, CA
    Posts
    1,215
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Commodus View Post
    Lots of people are falling back on this old nonsense that Lance was just 'leveling the playing field.'

    This is completely untrue. There have always been drugs in cycling, and even, at times, organized doping programs within teams. The problem with Lance is that he not only used the best dope available, and retained the exclusive services of the best doping doctor in the world; but he also sought out and destroyed the careers of those trying to clean up the sport.

    We're talking about a guy who would openly mock teammates who hesitated to use, and then of course would refuse to put them on the Tour team if they didn't.

    During Lance's time, drug regimens developed that were extremely effective and extremely dangerous. If you were willing to take the risks, and your body responded well to them and you could afford it, you were riding with a huge advantage. It only takes a cursory examination of Lance's career before and after his cancer to see that this was a rider who was not likely to ever win a GT, who suddenly turned into one of the greatest stage racers of all time.
    The problem for you is that he was working with Ferrari before and after. So, if you believe he doped pre-cancer (which I "always" assumed) and believe he doped post-cancer (which I now conclude he did) the question is: why did he "suddenly" become a GC rider post cancer, if he was doping his whole--if not, most of his professional career with Ferrari? Maybe, his weight loss did play into that more than his detractors are willing to admit. I do remember reading that Lemond said that he'd be "petrified" if he gained even a pound of muscle. Weight is a huge deal in cycling; and it's clear to me that Armstrong lost at least 10lbs after his bout with cancer.

  3. #228
    Senior Member Rotten Bastard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cat4Lifer View Post
    Maybe, his weight loss did play into that more than his detractors are willing to admit. I do remember reading that Lemond said that he'd be "petrified" if he gained even a pound of muscle. Weight is a huge deal in cycling; and it's clear to me that Armstrong lost at least 10lbs after his bout with cancer.
    Look how much mileage Wiggins got out of losing 16 or so pounds.
    Last edited by Rotten Bastard; 06-19-11 at 06:19 PM.

  4. #229
    Senior Member ravenmore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    8,059
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cat4Lifer View Post
    The problem for you is that he was working with Ferrari before and after. So, if you believe he doped pre-cancer (which I "always" assumed) and believe he doped post-cancer (which I now conclude he did) the question is: why did he "suddenly" become a GC rider post cancer, if he was doping his whole--if not, most of his professional career with Ferrari? Maybe, his weight loss did play into that more than his detractors are willing to admit. I do remember reading that Lemond said that he'd be "petrified" if he gained even a pound of muscle. Weight is a huge deal in cycling; and it's clear to me that Armstrong lost at least 10lbs after his bout with cancer.
    I want to say I read somewhere that Lance raced at 180 pounds before cancer. I believe during his last couple of tours he was down around 165.
    Ravenmore's Pictures
    Ravenmore's Photo Blog

    Mean people are like slinkys. They're really not worth much but still are rather entertaining to watch tumble down the stairs.

  5. #230
    Velo Club La Grange Cat4Lifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    MDR, CA
    Posts
    1,215
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ravenmore View Post
    I believe during his last couple of tours he was down around 165.
    I read mid 150s, which is very believable for his stated height of 5'10"

  6. #231
    Port Rocket-Sauce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Boston
    My Bikes
    1990 Fuji Ace, 1990 Bridgestone RB-1, 1995 Independent Fabrications Track, 2005 Calfee Dragonfly Pro
    Posts
    4,906
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rotten Bastard View Post
    Look how much mileage Wiggins got out of losing 16 or so pounds.
    Just playing devil's advocate here, but why do you assume Wiggo didn't dope? He, along with the rest of his Cofidis squad, withdrew from the Tour in '07 after Moreni failed a doping test.

    It is hard to find a pro rider with NO ties to doping scandal.

  7. #232
    Senior Member Rotten Bastard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rocket-Sauce View Post
    Just playing devil's advocate here, but why do you assume Wiggo didn't dope? He, along with the rest of his Cofidis squad, withdrew from the Tour in '07 after Moreni failed a doping test.

    It is hard to find a pro rider with NO ties to doping scandal.
    I agree that it's hard to take things at face value these days, but Wiggins has been really outspoken about the whole doping issue. The '07 withdrawal was just a matter of him being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Plus, he's been really transparent with his training data, especially in '09 when he was with Garmin. If there's anyone who's clean these days, it's Wiggins.

  8. #233
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    My Bikes
    2009 Fuji Newest 1.0, 2011 Trek 3900 Disc MTB
    Posts
    1,266
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by AzTallRider View Post
    No new news in awhile. Anyone else think someone will stir the pot again before TdF starts?
    Consider it stirred: http://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor...Armstrong.html

    Plus, what I'm hearing is that the grand jury might wrap up during the race.

  9. #234
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    My Bikes
    2009 Fuji Newest 1.0, 2011 Trek 3900 Disc MTB
    Posts
    1,266
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cat4Lifer View Post
    Weight is a huge deal in cycling; and it's clear to me that Armstrong lost at least 10lbs after his bout with cancer.
    Even as someone who doesnt believe in the armstrong myth anymore, after cancer he was absolutely a different cyclist. Before cancer, I believe he eventually would have left the pro peloton to become a pro triathlete and may have been the best ever there too, doping or not. I dont deny he has a huge engine, and maybe hard to go through cancer to harness the talent, that said, he doped and theres no excuse for it, and he won his tours on the backs of others who doped. Theres video evidence of Vaughters confessing, theres online IM evidence of JV and FA talking about it. Its doping, and its cheating, and in this sport people have admired cheaters for far too long.

  10. #235
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    My Bikes
    2009 Fuji Newest 1.0, 2011 Trek 3900 Disc MTB
    Posts
    1,266
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by PeddlingPilgrim View Post
    i think the facts4lance twitter account and the actual site was a crazy floyd landis job, is this right? facts4lance is private now, has this been posted?

    http://goo.gl/kC3vJ

    "GreyManrod‎ @cycletard We are celebrating the arrival of full ****** @joelfelicio tempered by the disappearance of Facts4Lance.com"

    greymanrod is floyd:

    http://neilbrowne.com/2011/05/is-the...tes-interview/
    True and false. The facts4lance site was set up by Lances attorney to combat the 60 minutes story. Lance forgot to have him grab the facts4lance twitter, so Floyd grabbed that. Then Floyd and NYVelocity created a couple more facts4lance sites (.org and .net) and directed them to gay porn and EPO buying sites.

    The original facts4lance went away because Lances lawyer said they had successfully debunked all of the 60 minutes stories, which was funny because most of his "debunking" of the facts was really based on stuff he pulled off the Grey Manrod account. And Grey Manrod wasnt even just floyd, which is the best part: http://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor...Armstrong.html

  11. #236
    Port Rocket-Sauce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Boston
    My Bikes
    1990 Fuji Ace, 1990 Bridgestone RB-1, 1995 Independent Fabrications Track, 2005 Calfee Dragonfly Pro
    Posts
    4,906
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rotten Bastard View Post
    I agree that it's hard to take things at face value these days, but Wiggins has been really outspoken about the whole doping issue. The '07 withdrawal was just a matter of him being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Plus, he's been really transparent with his training data, especially in '09 when he was with Garmin. If there's anyone who's clean these days, it's Wiggins.
    You could say the exact same thing for Lance....

    Again, just being Devil's Advocate here....

Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •