Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Senior Member texastwister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    392
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Why not tubeless for the Peloton ?

    why have the pro's not gone with a clincher tubeless i know they run a glued on tubular , but i also see were some pro teams are running clinchers with tubes this year, so why not have best of both worlds , i think the sealant in the tubeless would seal fast enough not to loose to much pressure so they could finish the race without having to wait for a spare and loosing seconds if not minutes at the end of a race...just me thinking out loud
    Last edited by texastwister; 07-11-12 at 02:44 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Allen, TX
    My Bikes
    Look 585
    Posts
    1,234
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    First, the selection of road tublesss tires is very limited. Second, the best compliment you can give a road tubeless is "its almost as good as a tubular" -- so just use a tubular -- there's no limit to the available options. I had road tubular since around 2007 but used normal tires and tubes due to the limited tire choices.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Jed19's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    3,751
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes, as bikepro wrote, limited choice re tubeless tires, and If you have a team car or neutral support car ready to switch out your flats, then no reason not to go tubular. Tubular wheels are much more lighter than tubeless or clinchers, and tubular tires stay on with flats as opposed to rolling off as a clincher tire does, thus safer, with the amount of mountains/passes that are rode.

    If I have a team car and mechanics that follow me on training rides and races, I won't mess with anything other than tubulars.
    Regards,

    Jed

  4. #4
    Lance Hater Laggard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    4,316
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If I had my own mechanic and support vehicle Id run sew ups all the time.
    i may have overreacted

  5. #5
    bored of "Senior Member"
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    MD / metro DC
    My Bikes
    Cross-Check/Nexus commuter. Several others for various forms of play.
    Posts
    1,030
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by texastwister View Post
    why have the pro's not gone with a clincher tubeless i know they run a glued on tubular , but i also see were some pro teams are running clinchers with tubes this year, so why not have best of both worlds , i think the sealant in the tubeless would seal fast enough not to loose to much pressure so they could finish the race without having to wait for a spare and loosing seconds if not minutes at the end of a race...just me thinking out loud
    Tubeless does not necessarily have sealant. Optional sealant is heavy. Weight kills. Even without that extra sealant weight, it's not necessarily clear that clincher tubeless is as good, let alone better.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Keith99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,732
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by texastwister View Post
    why have the pro's not gone with a clincher tubeless i know they run a glued on tubular , but i also see were some pro teams are running clinchers with tubes this year, so why not have best of both worlds , i think the sealant in the tubeless would seal fast enough not to loose to much pressure so they could finish the race without having to wait for a spare and loosing seconds if not minutes at the end of a race...just me thinking out loud
    A rider is much better to switch out a tire that is non-optimal then to ride it out.

    My bet is tubeless is suboptimal to start. Seconds are rarely lost. They are made back as soon as a rider rejoins the group.

    Anything using sealant loses some air. At levels well below the TDF that makes a difference. enough to lose a sprint or not catch a break.
    Perish any man who suspects that these men either did or suffered anything unseemly.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,628
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by texastwister View Post
    why have the pro's not gone with a clincher tubeless i know they run a glued on tubular , but i also see were some pro teams are running clinchers with tubes this year, so why not have best of both worlds , i think the sealant in the tubeless would seal fast enough not to loose to much pressure so they could finish the race without having to wait for a spare and loosing seconds if not minutes at the end of a race...just me thinking out loud
    Safety and tradition. On a high speed descent if a tubular goes flat it will usually (but not always) stay on the rim. A tubeless tire is much more likely to come off the rim at high speed and cause a more serious crash.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    7,819
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    TUbulars still have too many advantages other type of tires dont have, they will get close but wont be the same ever. Ask tony martin and his darn clinchers in the prologo wiggo and evans still w/o punctures apparently.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •