Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    LBKA punkncat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    OTP South
    Posts
    2,081
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    What is with all the headline grabbing and smearing?

    I see that someone else has already posted a thread about FS "positive" for a diuretic that isn't even on the banned substance list (according to what I have read). This is another in a line of arrests and accusations leveled against riders in the TdF as well as the upcoming Olympics.

    What reason would these "governing bodies" of the sport be so interested in destroying itself from within like this?
    Is there some good reason to drag all this dirty laundry out right now other than sensationalist headline grabbing?
    One Foot Less

  2. #2
    Senior Member reef58's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Wilmington, NC
    My Bikes
    Serotta Nove
    Posts
    1,633
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think upon further reading it is a banned substance, and it is a known masking agent. What are they to do with a positive result? They have to call the rider out.

  3. #3
    LBKA punkncat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    OTP South
    Posts
    2,081
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    "Xipamide, the substance found in Schleck's urine, is not specifically mentioned on WADA's prohibited substance list."

    From http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/uci-announces-adverse-analytical-finding-for-frank-schleck-at-tour-de-france


    Not even specifically this event, it is just the most recent example. IDK how to express the regret that I feel that this happened at all, but at the same time...there has to be a more tactful way of dealing with this
    One Foot Less

  4. #4
    Senior Member Shimagnolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Zang's Spur, CO
    Posts
    6,455
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    http://www.usada.org/prohibited-list/athlete-guide/

    "S5. Diuretics and Other Masking Agent
    Masking agents are prohibited, to include diuretics and plasma expanders."

  5. #5
    LBKA punkncat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    OTP South
    Posts
    2,081
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ah, so in essence it is more of a not specifically named but blanket ruling?
    One Foot Less

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    1,636
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    From Velo...http://velonews.competitor.com/2012/...dium=whats-hot
    The Substance

    Xipamide is a prescription-only, orally administered diuretic drug. It is also knows as Diurexan, the brand name under which it may be found in a pharmacy. A doctor typically prescribes the drug, in tablet form, to a patient dealing with high blood pressure. In these cases, high blood pressure is caused not by arterial fat buildup, but by high sodium levels in the blood. Since water follows solutes (solid matter), high levels of sodium in the blood will cause increased water retention in the bloodstream as well, putting excess strain on the heart as it tries to move the extra fluid.


    Diuretics are typically used in sport as masking agents. Although that term is a misnomer, as diuretics donít actually mask anything, they conceal the presence of a drug by helping to flush it from the body through increased urination. Using this effect, an athlete could use Xipamide to help remove traces of banned substances prior to a doping control.
    Everyone has a right to an opinion. However, this does not mean that one's opinion is right.

  7. #7
    LBKA punkncat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    OTP South
    Posts
    2,081
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It would seem to me that using a diuretic and becoming dehydrated would be more counterproductive to an athlete in an event like this.

    Aside from this incident, like the news last week where the hotel rooms were stormed in the middle of the night, etc. There has to be a better way of dealing with this than smearing the sport across the news this way.
    One Foot Less

  8. #8
    Senior Member seanthebear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Taiwan
    My Bikes
    Fuji Roubaix, Bianchi mongrel
    Posts
    193
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    He hasn't got a leg to stand on.....there is only one reason a rider would take a diuretic; to mask steroid use. He has no fall back alibi because his team doesn't carry that drug so it has to be self-administered.
    Original weight 87 kgs, Current weight 80 kgs, Target weight 76 kgs

  9. #9
    Senior Member Commodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Burnaby, BC
    Posts
    4,144
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This is what a sport that actually care about doping looks like. It just seems odd because it's the only one, apparently.

  10. #10
    Senior Member seanthebear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Taiwan
    My Bikes
    Fuji Roubaix, Bianchi mongrel
    Posts
    193
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    And Frank's now playing the "poisoned" card. Who the hell poisons people with diuretics?
    Original weight 87 kgs, Current weight 80 kgs, Target weight 76 kgs

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Haunchyville
    Posts
    6,342
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by seanthebear View Post
    Who the hell poisons people with diuretics?
    Maybe Nick Roche?


    12 Frank Schleck (Lux) RadioShack-Nissan 0:09:45
    13 Nicolas Roche (Irl) AG2R La Mondiale 0:10:49

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •