Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Professional Cycling For the Fans Follow the Tour de France,the Giro de Italia, the Spring Classics, or other professional cycling races? Here's your home...

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-29-12, 06:51 PM   #1
steam master
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
was 2012 TDF the most boring ever ?

I was very disappointed. It was boring.
steam master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-12, 07:04 PM   #2
Jed19 
Senior Member
 
Jed19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 4,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yeah, it was not that great. Especially when the most talented climber of his generation (Contador) was not there.
__________________
Regards,

Jed
Jed19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-12, 07:09 PM   #3
steam master
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
you are right. i dont like contador but he was exciting to watch and was probably the best rider in the tour.

correct me if i am wrong, but it looked like wiggins teamate could have beaten him but slowed down instead.
steam master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-12, 07:47 PM   #4
Jed19 
Senior Member
 
Jed19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 4,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steam master View Post
you are right. i dont like contador but he was exciting to watch and was probably the best rider in the tour.

correct me if i am wrong, but it looked like wiggins teamate could have beaten him but slowed down instead.
Yeah, Froome could have put some time on Wiggins. How much time, and whether he could have won the whole GC shebang is another kettle of fish altogether, as Wiggins is a much better time-trialist than Froome. The truth though, is that Froome was hired as Wiggo's domestique, and he stuck to his job description.
__________________
Regards,

Jed
Jed19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-12, 07:56 PM   #5
Bacciagalupe
Professional Fuss-Budget
 
Bacciagalupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 6,438
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
And you're basing this on how many years of TdF history? 2 or 3?

Plenty of TdF's have been won with a strong team and conservative tactics, notably Anquetil's 5 wins. It happens because in many cases, a strong team conservative tactics are a good way to win. Kinda hard to argue with success.

Plus, the great thing about the Tour is that it involves much more than just the GC. E.g. this year you had France taking 5 stages, lots of new talent (Sagan, TVG, Pinot), a fairly intense Polka Dot competition....
Bacciagalupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-12, 08:01 PM   #6
eja_ bottecchia
Senior Member
 
eja_ bottecchia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 3,520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Except for Voeckler's facial expressions, Gilbert scaring the $hit out of a little girl, and TeeJay winning the white jersey, yes a very boring TdF.

Snoozeville...(yet I miss it).
eja_ bottecchia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-12, 08:02 PM   #7
eja_ bottecchia
Senior Member
 
eja_ bottecchia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 3,520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bacciagalupe View Post
plus, the great thing about the tour is that it involves much more than just the gc. E.g. This year you had france taking 5 stages, lots of new talent (sagan, tvg, pinot), a fairly intense polka dot competition....
^^^this^^^
eja_ bottecchia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-12, 08:06 PM   #8
Laggard
Lance Hater
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Bikes:
Posts: 4,403
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steam master View Post
I was very disappointed. It was boring.
Then you are a boring person.

When you have more than two tdfs under your belt you will learn to enjoy and appreciate all aspects of racing, not just the GC.
Laggard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-12, 08:34 PM   #9
Athens80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 839
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Watch it again and look out for Cancellara, Cavendish, Fedrigo, Froome, Goss, Greipel, Kessiakoff, Millar, Morkov, Pinot, Rolland, Sagan, Sanchez, Sorensen, van Garderen, Voeckler, etc. etc.

There's plenty to watch beyond the GC leader board.
Athens80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-12, 08:36 PM   #10
zonatandem
Senior Member
 
zonatandem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Bikes: Custom Zona c/f tandem + Scott Plasma single
Posts: 10,859
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
If you call it 'most boring', then why did you watch it?
zonatandem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-12, 08:47 PM   #11
cthenn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Bikes: 2015 Trek Emonda SLR, 2002 Litespeed Classic, 2005 Bianchi Pista, 2016 Devinci Hatchet, Some BikesDirect MTB I never ride.
Posts: 1,407
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Of the ones I've watched, yes. Really, it's hard to compare to 2011, one of the best I've seen, but overall, I'm already starting to forget what happened from day to day. Apart from Voeckler a few days, and Froome's hilarity on Stage 17(?) when he kept looking back and motioning for Mr. Wiggo, there wasn't much to take away from this years edition. Oh yeah, I remember Greipel kicking Crashy Farrar in the head and then winning a stage, that was pretty awesome.
cthenn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-12, 08:52 PM   #12
downtube42
Senior Member
 
downtube42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Angelo, TX
Bikes: Volae Team, '76 Motobecane Grand Jubile
Posts: 1,712
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Athens80 View Post
Watch it again and look out for Cancellara, Cavendish, Fedrigo, Froome, Goss, Greipel, Kessiakoff, Millar, Morkov, Pinot, Rolland, Sagan, Sanchez, Sorensen, van Garderen, Voeckler, etc. etc.

There's plenty to watch beyond the GC leader board.
+1
downtube42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-12, 11:27 PM   #13
Alekhine
1. e4 Nf6
 
Alekhine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 7844`W, 4246`N
Bikes: Mercian KoM with Rohloff, Bike Friday NWT, Pogliaghi Italcorse (1979)
Posts: 872
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Ya, there are other things besides the GC to spice up a tour, absolutely. I think people are making the mistake of not indicating that they are talking about the GC comp exclusively, instead saying it was a boring tour, and as people are correctly pointing out, it just wasn't. I found Voeckler's and Sagan's stories this year very exciting. I don't see any reason why the question of this year's GC being something of a Bore de France is particularly illegitimate though. It's okay to say it. I've been enjoying this event and others longer than many here have been alive, and yes, I was less than enthusiastic about the 2012 GC comp as it unfolded.

That said, to answer the OP, sure - there are other tours in history that compete with it and even supersede this year's GC in the snooze department. To some extent any GC comp where the first place finisher thrashes the field from beginning to end is in its way boring or at least not so suspense-filled, and there have been plenty of those, including probably the most celebrated tour ever with Merckx in '69. The difference in that case is that Merckx was such an exciting rider and went all out and blasted the field on more than just the TTs (and of course won everything there was to win). It's just exciting to watch a superman do his thing. People look forward to interesting mountain stages and GC contender stage wins that aren't TTs. That's just the way it is. The desire to root for the underdog is an old one too, so people want to see a visible struggle between worthy adversaries, preferably with some seesaw component in the standings or even made-up time on a stage over the leader, even if the underdog loses in the end. Added to this, just about any tour where some current top class rider(s) are absent can be disappointing for some before it even begins, or tours where a big name drops out mid-ride, etc (Ocana!). Lots of variables, and this year's tour had a few of the negative ones in the same hat. Funny enough, I found it exciting in those moments this year where Evans bonked in the mountains.

Would disagree to a slight extent with Bacciagalupe about all 5 of Anquetil's wins, though his characterization of Anquetil is pretty true. He was primarily a conservative rider whose godlike TT skills did most of the trick, not unlike Wiggo. But it's not just the winner and his team tactics that makes it boring or not. It takes two (sometimes more) to tango, and it feels like people are disappointed with Wiggins'/SKY's competition more than anything. Conservative GC riders and TT specialists who are workmanlike in the climbs still have to deal with not-so-conservative competitors, particularly in the mountains, and those competitors can make for a wildly exciting GC comp no matter how boring the winner's tactics are - or even better - the comp can make that conservative rider drop his conservatism (and his support). The 1964 tour was especially dramatic with regard to what people want out of a good GC, and the duel between Anquetil and Poulidor on the Puy de Dome absolutely dwarfed anything in this year's GC comp suspense-wise. To be fair, it dwarfed most GC stories and was a very close race, with Anquetil not taking the maillot jaune until very late and only beating Poulidor by 55 seconds overall. I have a photo of those two practically leaning on each other on the Puy with looks on their faces that are pretty similar to death - that's exciting. The 1961 tour (Anquetil) on the other hand was even more of a total whitewash than this one.
Alekhine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-12, 12:38 AM   #14
steam master
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I remember at least 3 stages where the "favorite" sprinters jumped and then quit after about 2 seconds. It really seemed to be that they didnt care and didnt want to put in the effort.

There didnt seem to be any competition in the mountains.
steam master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-12, 12:48 AM   #15
colombo357
Senior Member
 
colombo357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 1,995
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steam master View Post
I was very disappointed.
Nobody cares. Nobody.
colombo357 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-12, 01:06 AM   #16
steam master
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by colombo357 View Post
Nobody cares. Nobody.
says the person who took the time to respond.
steam master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-12, 05:34 AM   #17
cbuddy2005
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Leander Texas
Bikes: GT avalanche, '78 Gran Criterion
Posts: 134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I don't know if I would say boring, but it was lacking something this year IMO.
Lacking a truly dangerous attacker from the GC--i.e Contador. Yes, there were attacks, but not much got away. Yes, Sky was dominant, too dominant for a very interesting tour? To me it seemed I was watching a lot of tour, waiting for the action to come that really didn't materialize. I always like to see attacks, especially in the mountains. Did this year seem less mountainous? Maybe some changes in years to come? No radios and smaller teams maybe. 9 guys a team seems like a lot. Maybe limit the number in the field/team members on certain days--maybe this will change the look of the tour and limit some of the crashes. I dunno, maybe all the tv coverage has me wanting to see action all the time. Maybe I have forgotten how tough each stage is and it can't be all action. Also seems there are limited tactics in this kind of a race and everybody knows them so breaks don't get away often enough?
cbuddy2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-12, 10:14 AM   #18
daveF
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 738
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The 2012 TDF was not boring. However, this thread is.

Which do you prefer? A relatively clean peloton or each rider bringing 4 bags of blood to the start? Maybe 2006 with Floyd falling apart & losing huge amounts of time one day. A transfusion for recovery that evening & the next day riding away from the peloton all day.
daveF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-12, 10:21 AM   #19
colombo357
Senior Member
 
colombo357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 1,995
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steam master View Post
says the person who took the time to respond.
Irrelevant.

I would agree that the GC aspect of the tour wasn't particularly suspenseful, but nobody cares about how "disappointed" you are. The tour isn't about you, contrary to what you'd like to believe.
colombo357 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-12, 10:21 AM   #20
canam73
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Haunchyville
Bikes:
Posts: 6,375
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
So then what was the most boring TdF? Because even if none were truly boring, one of them was still 'the most boring'.

Maybe not ever, because most of us weren't alive for the early ones, but say of the last 30 years.
canam73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-12, 11:13 AM   #21
steam master
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by colombo357 View Post
but nobody cares about how "disappointed" you are. The tour isn't about you, contrary to what you'd like to believe.
I tend to disagree. I am the fan, the consumer, the reason the tour is put on. I pay for the tour. If fans are disappointed they watch less and then races go away and people like you cry because they cant ooogle their favorite men in spandex. Think of Georgia and Colorado and many others.

Now dont tell me no one cares about me and what I think because I AM IMPORTANT.
steam master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-12, 11:37 AM   #22
tagaproject6
Goodbye Leeroy Jenkins
 
tagaproject6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Bikes: Wilier Izoard XP (Campagnolo Record);Cinelli Xperience (SRAM Force);Specialized Allez (SRAM Rival);Bianchi Via Nirone 7 (Campagnolo Centaur)
Posts: 7,061
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steam master View Post
I tend to disagree. I am the fan, the consumer, the reason the tour is put on. I pay for the tour. If fans are disappointed they watch less and then races go away and people like you cry because they cant ooogle their favorite men in spandex. Think of Georgia and Colorado and many others.

Now dont tell me no one cares about me and what I think because I AM IMPORTANT.
Midnight Biker? Is that you?
tagaproject6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-12, 11:38 AM   #23
steam master
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tagaproject6 View Post
Midnight Biker? Is that you?

I usually go to bed around 9:30
steam master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-12, 12:34 PM   #24
DiabloScott
It's MY mountain
 
DiabloScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Bikes:
Posts: 6,852
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by canam73 View Post
So then what was the most boring TdF? Because even if none were truly boring, one of them was still 'the most boring'.
I think it was one of the Indurain years... I can't remember which because they all seemed the same. Also, Indurain was the most boring winner.
DiabloScott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-12, 01:56 PM   #25
Keith99
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alekhine View Post
Ya, there are other things besides the GC to spice up a tour, absolutely. I think people are making the mistake of not indicating that they are talking about the GC comp exclusively, instead saying it was a boring tour, and as people are correctly pointing out, it just wasn't. I found Voeckler's and Sagan's stories this year very exciting. I don't see any reason why the question of this year's GC being something of a Bore de France is particularly illegitimate though. It's okay to say it. I've been enjoying this event and others longer than many here have been alive, and yes, I was less than enthusiastic about the 2012 GC comp as it unfolded.

That said, to answer the OP, sure - there are other tours in history that compete with it and even supersede this year's GC in the snooze department. To some extent any GC comp where the first place finisher thrashes the field from beginning to end is in its way boring or at least not so suspense-filled, and there have been plenty of those, including probably the most celebrated tour ever with Merckx in '69. The difference in that case is that Merckx was such an exciting rider and went all out and blasted the field on more than just the TTs (and of course won everything there was to win). It's just exciting to watch a superman do his thing. People look forward to interesting mountain stages and GC contender stage wins that aren't TTs. That's just the way it is. The desire to root for the underdog is an old one too, so people want to see a visible struggle between worthy adversaries, preferably with some seesaw component in the standings or even made-up time on a stage over the leader, even if the underdog loses in the end. Added to this, just about any tour where some current top class rider(s) are absent can be disappointing for some before it even begins, or tours where a big name drops out mid-ride, etc (Ocana!). Lots of variables, and this year's tour had a few of the negative ones in the same hat. Funny enough, I found it exciting in those moments this year where Evans bonked in the mountains.

Would disagree to a slight extent with Bacciagalupe about all 5 of Anquetil's wins, though his characterization of Anquetil is pretty true. He was primarily a conservative rider whose godlike TT skills did most of the trick, not unlike Wiggo. But it's not just the winner and his team tactics that makes it boring or not. It takes two (sometimes more) to tango, and it feels like people are disappointed with Wiggins'/SKY's competition more than anything. Conservative GC riders and TT specialists who are workmanlike in the climbs still have to deal with not-so-conservative competitors, particularly in the mountains, and those competitors can make for a wildly exciting GC comp no matter how boring the winner's tactics are - or even better - the comp can make that conservative rider drop his conservatism (and his support). The 1964 tour was especially dramatic with regard to what people want out of a good GC, and the duel between Anquetil and Poulidor on the Puy de Dome absolutely dwarfed anything in this year's GC comp suspense-wise. To be fair, it dwarfed most GC stories and was a very close race, with Anquetil not taking the maillot jaune until very late and only beating Poulidor by 55 seconds overall. I have a photo of those two practically leaning on each other on the Puy with looks on their faces that are pretty similar to death - that's exciting. The 1961 tour (Anquetil) on the other hand was even more of a total whitewash than this one.
Bolding mine.

I agree. Just want ot emphasise that if one was looking only at teh GC race 69 was over pretty early. But Merckx was the unAnquetil. He was not satisfied to defend, he attacked. I'm pretty sure that by midway through stage 17 everything was settled (save mathematically or Eddy crashing out) but it was the end of the stage that became the thing of legends.

There was plenty in this years tour. Plenty to go with on how Green would play out until fairly late. With a not a pure sprinter in the mix there wa a lot of interesting tactical decistion made. (and one could anticipate just where the possibilities were). But these went unnoticed until after the fact.
Keith99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:15 PM.