Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Professional Cycling For the Fans Follow the Tour de France,the Giro de Italia, the Spring Classics, or other professional cycling races? Here's your home...

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-14-13, 01:48 PM   #76
jr59
Senior Member
 
jr59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: the 904, Jax fl
Bikes:
Posts: 2,287
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You guys really need to remember that this is pro cycling we are speaking of.

For 100 years it has been a dirty sport and things have been written about it.
No different than now. "do you think we ride the tour on just mineral water"?

You can say the drugs are better, and yes they are, but 100 years ago the riders
took what they thought would give them the best advantage. They didn't know about blood doping and EPO.
If they did, they would have taken those as well. Same thing goes on today. IT'S A DIRTY sport! Always has been.
Has been for 100 years, do you really think it's changed now? REALLY?

I watch it, it entertains me, and isn't that what sport is suppose to do?
jr59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 01:50 PM   #77
cincipeddler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 124
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Don't they, where did those numbers come from last week? Is that an independant analysis?
cincipeddler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 01:50 PM   #78
xfimpg
Senior Member
 
xfimpg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 3,089
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bacciagalupe View Post
Sky doesn't release power numbers.
That's right, didn't Froome reply a few days ago that numbers were over-exaggerated or something to that effect?

Anyhow, now we see the REAL Contador dope free and he's pretty average. He must be pissed that he left his blood bags at home.
xfimpg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 01:53 PM   #79
Bacciagalupe
Professional Fuss-Budget
 
Bacciagalupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 6,438
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pantani98 View Post
if everyone was bonking or feeling depleated, then it just gave them that much of an advantage.
I agree it's an infraction, and Sky should pay the standard penalty.

However, it really didn't give them much of an advantage. All it did was save one domestique from ferrying water and snacks a short distance. It certainly didn't result in Froome & Porte climbing any faster, which is why there isn't much grousing about it.
Bacciagalupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 01:54 PM   #80
Bacciagalupe
Professional Fuss-Budget
 
Bacciagalupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 6,438
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by xfimpg View Post
That's right, didn't Froome reply a few days ago that numbers were over-exaggerated or something to that effect?
I think Brailsford said that the power estimations (used by some journos and Internet denizens) were off base.
Bacciagalupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 01:56 PM   #81
TommyBing
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Auzeville-Tolosane, Midi-Pyrénées
Bikes: Redline Carbon Conquest Team, Colnago X-Lite (Wrecked, Stripped, Wal-Arted), Ibis Hakkalugi (STOLEN!!!), Bianchi Imola, Bianchi San Jose, Soma DC DC
Posts: 301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I thought the feed bag incident was crazy, yet I can't find a single reference to it on Velonews or Cyclingnews. Anyone have a link for me that openly questions this outside of an internet forum?

Anyone have a real time today on the climb? Is there an "official" climbing time? I've seen many reports, here and elsewhere, saying it was faster than Lance. But different reports quote different segments, i.e. "last 6km, 6.75km, 9km", so let's just lay out the numbers.

Let's just try to objectively compare winning times on Ventoux.

I watched the entire race unfold today. Peter Sagan is wonderful. And Sky Cycling should have every question asked of them at every single step of the course.
TommyBing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 01:57 PM   #82
kenji666
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: On yer left
Bikes:
Posts: 1,648
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bacciagalupe View Post
I agree it's an infraction, and Sky should pay the standard penalty.

However, it really didn't give them much of an advantage. All it did was save one domestique from ferrying water and snacks a short distance. It certainly didn't result in Froome & Porte climbing any faster, which is why there isn't much grousing about it.
If Saxo or Movistar want to complain about advantages, they should complain about all of the doping taking place by Sky.
kenji666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 02:10 PM   #83
Grumpy McTrumpy
gmt
 
Grumpy McTrumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Bikes:
Posts: 12,452
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TommyBing View Post
Anyone have a real time today on the climb? Is there an "official" climbing time? I've seen many reports, here and elsewhere, saying it was faster than Lance. But different reports quote different segments, i.e. "last 6km, 6.75km, 9km", so let's just lay out the numbers.
The best estimates are 48:35 measured from the 180˚ turn at St. Esteve to the finish line. Fortunately, Laurens Ten Dam was in the Yellow Jersey group at that point and has already uploaded his ride file to Strava. I analysed it and found his ascent to be 50:23. Race results have him 1:53 behind the winner. That's 48:40. Pretty close.

Here are some historical figures. It is important to compare apples to apples, and hence, time trials (especially in the Dauphine) are not apples. Tour performances, especially at or near the end of a stage, would be apples.

http://www.sportsscientists.com/2013...orward-by.html

(quoting from above)

"In the current era, the top 30 times are shown below, by ranking. I have indicated some noteworthy performances - the top times of 2000, 2002 and 2009 belong to Pantani & Armstrong (49:01), Armstrong (48:33) and Schleck & Contador (48:57), respectively "
Grumpy McTrumpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 02:11 PM   #84
jr59
Senior Member
 
jr59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: the 904, Jax fl
Bikes:
Posts: 2,287
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenji666 View Post
If Saxo or Movistar want to complain about advantages, they should complain about all of the doping taking place by Sky.
People that live in glass houses, shouldn't throw rocks!
jr59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 02:32 PM   #85
Bacciagalupe
Professional Fuss-Budget
 
Bacciagalupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 6,438
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TommyBing View Post
I thought the feed bag incident was crazy, yet I can't find a single reference to it on Velonews or Cyclingnews. Anyone have a link for me that openly questions this outside of an internet forum?
What's to question? They broke a rule, they can't possibly deny it, they'll pay a penalty.


Quote:
Let's just try to objectively compare winning times on Ventoux.
You can't. Conditions (wind, temperature, humidity, fans, length of stage, how early or late in the Tour) are too variable.

Besides, you can't look at times and on that basis declare someone was or wasn't cheating. If that was the case, they'd have thrown out 75% of the peloton every year for the past 50 years.
Bacciagalupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 02:52 PM   #86
reef58
Senior Member
 
reef58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
Bikes: Serotta Nove
Posts: 1,634
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What significance does the age of 28 have? Can you not win the Tour after the age of 28? Wiggins, Evans, Armstrong, Sastre, Hinault were all in their 30's when they won.

What about before then parasite how many stage races did he win? He is so much better than everyone surely someone would have noticed the guy producing over 6 watts per KG on a climb. Let's hear of his cycling accomplishments prior to joining Sky. Let's hear one race he won that someone has heard of. Just one.

Did Froome not burn up any reserves trying to limit his losses, or almost beating Tony Martin during the time trial?

If you look at my earlier post you will see I am not crediting doping for his success but to ignore, or say he didn't come out of nowhere is burying your head in the sand.
reef58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 02:56 PM   #87
chewa
The Flying Scot
 
chewa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Queensferry Scotland and London (and France)
Bikes: Custom (Colin Laing) 531c fast tourer/audax, 1964 Flying Scot Continental, 1995 Cinelli Supercorsa, Holdsworth Mistral single speed, Dahon Speed 6 (folder), Micmo Sirocco and a few more
Posts: 1,902
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I didn't see anything to suggest Froome was doping, and would be disappointed if he is. Armstrong was obviously doping the whole time, his recovery was too great ,his ability to destroy specialist climbers and then bounce back next day was inhuman . Last year, Froome could have ridden away from Wiggins but didn't. He has been training all year for this event.

Sky (who I don't particularly like) have spent a huge amount of time, and money, researching the small things that lead to performance benefits. They have changed the way teams approach training and prep for stage races.

If Sky have a new drug, well, I'll be sad, but as some have said before, the tone of this thread says more about the sceptical nature of some contributors rather than anything sensible about Froome.

As for Contador, he was quick and exciting when doping, not now. And as for quoting an Virenque, well, it's hardly reliable is it?
__________________
plus je vois les hommes, plus j'admire les chiens

1985 Sandy Gilchrist-Colin Laing built 531c Audax/fast tourer.
1964 Flying Scot Continental (531)
1995 Cinelli Supercorsa (Columbus SLX)
1980s Holdsworth Mistral fixed (531)
2005 Dahon Speed 6 (folder)
(YES I LIKE STEEL)
2008 Viking Saratoga tandem
2008 Micmo Sirocco Hybrid (aluminium!)
2012 BTwin Rockrider 8.1
chewa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 03:19 PM   #88
reef58
Senior Member
 
reef58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
Bikes: Serotta Nove
Posts: 1,634
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chewa View Post
I didn't see anything to suggest Froome was doping, and would be disappointed if he is. Armstrong was obviously doping the whole time, his recovery was too great ,his ability to destroy specialist climbers and then bounce back next day was inhuman . Last year, Froome could have ridden away from Wiggins but didn't. He has been training all year for this event.

Sky (who I don't particularly like) have spent a huge amount of time, and money, researching the small things that lead to performance benefits. They have changed the way teams approach training and prep for stage races.
If Sky have a new drug, well, I'll be sad, but as some have said before, the tone of this thread says more about the sceptical nature of some contributors rather than anything sensible about Froome.

As for Contador, he was quick and exciting when doping, not now. And as for quoting an Virenque, well, it's hardly reliable is it?
Can you be specific? What have they done differently?
reef58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 03:25 PM   #89
cincipeddler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 124
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Wouldn't listen to Virenque actually be the smart thing to do? A guy who has been there and done that, who better than an insider who very likely talks to many of today's cyclists and team management?
The bottom line is that clearly the speculation is rife, so its hardly just a few on a forum, its all over the net, the press ask about it, maybe its uncalled for, but when sky have done the things they have done........a previously convicted doctor, no transparancy despite saying that they would, not releasing numbers and the amazing way that steady riders turn into superstars in no time.....its impossible not to be very suspicious!
cincipeddler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 03:37 PM   #90
chewa
The Flying Scot
 
chewa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Queensferry Scotland and London (and France)
Bikes: Custom (Colin Laing) 531c fast tourer/audax, 1964 Flying Scot Continental, 1995 Cinelli Supercorsa, Holdsworth Mistral single speed, Dahon Speed 6 (folder), Micmo Sirocco and a few more
Posts: 1,902
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by reef58 View Post
Can you be specific? What have they done differently?
According to all the documentaries I've seen they have changed the way athletes prepare for races, even changing the way they warm up and cool down (now all teams use static bikes for cool down). They have analysed all aspects of how athletes prepare for events and sought to make small improvements to each.

They have involved sports psychology more to aid athletes in mental preparation for big events. They control every aspect of the travel and hotel environment to minimise stress to the athletes, even bringing in air purifiers to make sure the overnight environment is the same.

They use nutritionists, dieticians, etc to ensure that the specific needs of each athlete are catered for.

They use the technology available to customise training for each rider and analyse to inform performance improvement(other teams do too, they just do it better). Dave Brailsford's drive is to make lots of small improvements to get the 15% improvement you could expect from drug use. Remember the same approach was taken to prepare the GB Olympic team, and I haven't seen any suggestion that they were doping.

Sky have a very aggressive, non forgiving, anti-drug policy. You just have to look at the names booted out or leaving when disclosure was requested.

As I say, I didn't see anything to me that suggested Froome was doping (and I can remember the Pantani, Armstrong, Landis, Basso, Rasmussen episodes as being VERY obvious). I'll be disappointed if he is.

I improved my hour personal best for this year last week by 14 seconds. No doubt I had EPO in my Frosties!
__________________
plus je vois les hommes, plus j'admire les chiens

1985 Sandy Gilchrist-Colin Laing built 531c Audax/fast tourer.
1964 Flying Scot Continental (531)
1995 Cinelli Supercorsa (Columbus SLX)
1980s Holdsworth Mistral fixed (531)
2005 Dahon Speed 6 (folder)
(YES I LIKE STEEL)
2008 Viking Saratoga tandem
2008 Micmo Sirocco Hybrid (aluminium!)
2012 BTwin Rockrider 8.1

Last edited by chewa; 07-14-13 at 03:39 PM. Reason: Edited for shocking spelling
chewa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 03:38 PM   #91
whitemax
Senior Member
 
whitemax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 1,926
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bacciagalupe View Post
It isn't. It's not like he single-handedly bridged the gap on stage 13. Nor do I hear anyone blast Quintana as a doper, for taking off early and blowing away everyone except Froome.

This kind of climbing ability isn't out of character for Froome, we saw it several times last year -- often accompanied by a chorus of "Froome should screw Wiggins and win the Tour!" Yes, the fans are fickle indeed...

Nor should it be all that surprising that he blew a bunch of riders out of the water today. Saxo burned up its energy on stage 13; Valverde obviously blew his wad on 13 as well, trying to get back in the break; Cuddles is 36, has always been inconsistent, and didn't do well last year either. Was anyone predicting a podium for Mollema or Ten Dam?



Meaning what, Postal was the only team systemically doping? Surely you jest.

Doping can explain why one rider recovers faster than another. But if everyone is doping, then it doesn't explain why one rider performs better than another.
I jest not and didn't imply that Postal was the only team doping. But...they did have a system which allowed them to evade detection for a very long time. It's plausible that someone would try to do it again.
whitemax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 03:55 PM   #92
Bacciagalupe
Professional Fuss-Budget
 
Bacciagalupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 6,438
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitemax View Post
I jest not and didn't imply that Postal was the only team doping. But...they did have a system which allowed them to evade detection for a very long time.
That "system" was, apparently, microdosing and blatantly avoiding testers. It's the same thing everyone else did, and no one else got caught.

There are always ways to avoid getting caught. If Sky can get away with doping, so can anyone else.
Bacciagalupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 03:55 PM   #93
colombo357
Senior Member
 
colombo357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 1,995
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitemax View Post
I jest not and didn't imply that Postal was the only team doping. But...they did have a system which allowed them to evade detection for a very long time.
What "system" are you talking about?

Tyler Hamilton's book and the USADA report, complete with affidavits, revealed a lot. The key doping method in the later years was homologous blood transfusions. Steroids aided recovery, but homologous blood was the key oxygen booster. It was too easy to detect EPO.

The Lance Armstrong "system" was actually quite simple... Michele Ferrari. Armstrong must have paid him a lot of money, because everyone else was going to Fuentes, a much more scatterbrained doctor who often mixed up bloodbags of different riders by accident. This is how Tyler Hamilton got caught, when he tested positive for having another rider's blood. Many people speculate that Contador's clenbeuterol positive was caused by the transfusion of a "tainted" blood bag - one that was extracted when the Contador had Clenbeuterol in his system. I'm not sure about Landis, but I think the situation was very similar yet again.
colombo357 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 04:03 PM   #94
whitemax
Senior Member
 
whitemax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 1,926
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by colombo357 View Post
What "system" are you talking about?

Tyler Hamilton's book and the USADA report, complete with affidavits, revealed a lot. The key doping method in the later years was homologous blood transfusions. Steroids aided recovery, but homologous blood was the key oxygen booster. It was too easy to detect EPO.

The Lance Armstrong "system" was actually quite simple... Michele Ferrari. Armstrong must have paid him a lot of money, because everyone else was going to Fuentes, a much more scatterbrained doctor who often mixed up bloodbags of different riders by accident. This is how Tyler Hamilton got caught, when he tested positive for having another rider's blood. Many people speculate that Contador's clenbeuterol positive was caused by the transfusion of a "tainted" blood bag - one that was extracted when the Contador had Clenbeuterol in his system. I'm not sure about Landis, but I think the situation was very similar yet again.
Didn't say it was complex, didn't say it was simple, didn't say it wasn't something that others could have been or were using. The fact is, Postal avoided detection for 7 years. Can't make this anymore succinct.
whitemax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 04:09 PM   #95
Bacciagalupe
Professional Fuss-Budget
 
Bacciagalupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 6,438
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by reef58 View Post
What significance does the age of 28 have? Can you not win the Tour after the age of 28?
You can, but a 36 year old does not recover as well as a 28 year old.


Quote:
What about before then parasite how many stage races did he win?
Brailsford allegedly saw Froome's potential back in 2006. http://velonews.competitor.com/2013/...to-2006_294574


Quote:
He is so much better than everyone surely someone would have noticed the guy producing over 6 watts per KG on a climb.
People have noticed it, for around 2 years. Most of that time he was working for Wiggo.

Quote:
Let's hear of his cycling accomplishments prior to joining Sky. Let's hear one race he won that someone has heard of. Just one.
Meaning what, anyone who hasn't fumbled around inconsistently like Sastre or Cuddles must be a doper?

Consider Ryder Hesjedal, who is one of the least likely riders in the pro peloton to be doping. He basically went from almost nothing, to 10th in Tour of California, to 1st in the Giro. Is that proof positive that he doped?


Quote:
Did Froome not burn up any reserves trying to limit his losses, or almost beating Tony Martin during the time trial?
The TT was before the rest day.

And yes, I'd say Froome did not work as hard on Stage 13 as the entire Saxo team. He realized he couldn't catch Saxo, and basically sat in the peloton. Same thing with Porte in the earlier split.
Bacciagalupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 04:10 PM   #96
reef58
Senior Member
 
reef58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
Bikes: Serotta Nove
Posts: 1,634
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Here is a quote from a cyclingnews article which sums up the doubt:

"In July 2011, Contador was the pre-eminent stage racer in world cycling, albeit fighting a doping sanction, while Froome was not even part of Sky's Tour de France line-up (he would finish a low-key 45th in that month's Brixia Tour), and the climb of Mont Ventoux provided a graphic illustration of just how remarkably the pendulum has swung over these past two years."
reef58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 04:11 PM   #97
reef58
Senior Member
 
reef58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
Bikes: Serotta Nove
Posts: 1,634
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Contador is not 36 so what is your point?
reef58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 04:22 PM   #98
Athens80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 832
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenji666 View Post
^The saddest casualty of doping on sports is the distrust we all feel in the results.
+1

Quote:
Originally Posted by chewa View Post
As I say, I didn't see anything to me that suggested Froome was doping (and I can remember the Pantani, Armstrong, Landis, Basso, Rasmussen episodes as being VERY obvious). I'll be disappointed if he is.
The most objective and suspicious indicator is that Froome's ascent of the Ax 3 Domaines to win stage 8 was the third fastest yet in Tour history, and the better and closest behind were doping-assisted. It's quite an improvement if a clean rider beats nearly all the doped riders of the near past.
Athens80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 04:53 PM   #99
Zinger
Trek 500 Kid
 
Zinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Spokane WA
Bikes: '83 Trek 970 road --- '86 Trek 500 road
Posts: 2,516
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 158 Post(s)
Let's just say that anytime I consider weighing in counseling prudence in speculations a little voice under my tin foil hat tells me: "Remember Geert Leinders and Froome's E.T. up Ax 3."

So I won't anymore. I've always told the cynics in my boxing forum that the E.T.s on the critical climbs were an indication that the sport is starting to clean up. I've also said that WBO welterweight champion Juan Manuel Marquez was likely juicing in an uncontrolled fight with Pacquiao (as was probably he) since he hired the services of Angel "Memo" Heredia. Heredia is known to be a distributor of PEDs.....So it wouldn't be consistent of me to counsel prudence in speculations.
Zinger is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-13, 05:05 PM   #100
AnthonyG
Senior Member
 
AnthonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Bikes:
Posts: 3,686
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
While the possibility of doping is still an issue the illegal feed station is front and centre. I don't think we need to speculate further for this stage. EVERY rider was hurting after such a fast stage up to the base of the mountain but only one team of riders got food to help them recover.

Anthony
AnthonyG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:08 PM.