Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Recreational Cyclocross and Gravelbiking This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like :The Dirty Kanza". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-17-05, 03:51 PM   #1
DogBoy
No one carries the DogBoy
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 2,309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
On my road-bike I ride a 56 cm frame. That gives me a toptube length of 555, and that is quite comfortable. Now I'm looking at a Jamis Nova, and thought I would need a 55 cm frame, since that's what my road-frame is, but in looking at the specs, It appears that the 55 cm frame has a 570 effective top tube length. Does this mean I should drop down to the 53 cm bike (555 eff TT)? I'm 5'11" with a 32" inseam. Would the 53 cramp up my cockpit somehow? I'm pretty confused. The stem for the 55 is 6deg rise 120 mm, and the stem for the 53 is also 6 deg rise but 100 mm. Should I just get the 55 with a shorter stem or go with the 53. Another reason to go with the 55 is the 44 cm handlebars vs 42. I think 55 is the way to go, but I'd like some input from others. I don't have either available for a testride, only a 51 is in the shop. Which bike should I order?

Last edited by DogBoy; 04-17-05 at 05:24 PM.
DogBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-05, 04:44 PM   #2
climbo
Member
 
climbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Australia
Bikes: a few
Posts: 2,404
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
in general, size the bike by the TT. And yes, most people end up going down a size from their road bike. The 53 sounds right for you, it gives you the same TT as your road bike (so with the same stem as your road bike you will not be cramped up). Stems and bars can always be adjusted, frames cannot.
climbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-05, 05:16 PM   #3
Surferbruce
Senior Member
 
Surferbruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles/Aveyron France
Bikes:
Posts: 5,308
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
i'd go with the 53. many cross bikes have higher bottom brackets so seattube lengths shrink.
size with the toptube and in this instance go with the same length stem as your road rig.
even if the bottom bracket isn't higher you'll still benefit from more standover on the dirt.
that's it. get the 53.
Surferbruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-05, 07:46 AM   #4
DogBoy
No one carries the DogBoy
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 2,309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I sat down with my roadbike and a measuring tape. and the geometry chart for the two bikes. 53 is the way to go, since if I got the 55 I'd need a REALLY short stem to duplicate my riding position. I think that may impact the handling characteristics, so I'll go with a 53 and show a little more seatpost. Thanks for the advice.
DogBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:20 PM.