Kona Roadhouse vs Salsa Warbird
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Kona Roadhouse vs Salsa Warbird
Hey all,
I recently started trimming down my bike collection (I know, not what you generally hear around these parts I got rid of my Giant TCR Carbon road bike and my single speed steel cyclocross bike --Raleigh Furley. Looking at adding an all around bike for recreational and some organized riding.
My current choices are the Salsa Warbird and the Kona Roadhouse. I test rode the Warbird and my shop has a cracking deal for a Warbird at $1500 for a 2016 Tiagra model in Orange. Now the color is not usually what I go for because it is pretty flashy but I must admit it doesn't look bad. I do like the ride and it's impressive how good that Alu frame really is.
My other choice is the Kona Roadhouse which I have also ridden as well. The Kona would set me back about $2200 but I would get a sweet steel frame with better componentry. The downside would be additional weight and less flexibility in tire width. I believe the Kona can support up to 35mm and the Warbird goes up to 42 ish.
In either case, I am looking to buy a sturdy bike that will last a long time and that can handle most recreational riding. I do plan on jumping in an occasional group ride (Nothing too crazy 18-20mph), doing some centuries and hitting up some fire roads/gravel. I still have a 29er hardtail that I can take out to if I am itching for some single track.
I honestly dig how the Kona looks and its a bike that will be cool in 10 years and will probably hold its value. I like how the warbird rides and it does feel lighter than the Roadhouse but the deal I am getting really makes the Warbird a contender. I would more than likely purchase a second set of wheels for either bike if I got more into group rides if i felt that the knobbier tires became too cumbersome.
Anything else I am missing in my comparison?
I recently started trimming down my bike collection (I know, not what you generally hear around these parts I got rid of my Giant TCR Carbon road bike and my single speed steel cyclocross bike --Raleigh Furley. Looking at adding an all around bike for recreational and some organized riding.
My current choices are the Salsa Warbird and the Kona Roadhouse. I test rode the Warbird and my shop has a cracking deal for a Warbird at $1500 for a 2016 Tiagra model in Orange. Now the color is not usually what I go for because it is pretty flashy but I must admit it doesn't look bad. I do like the ride and it's impressive how good that Alu frame really is.
My other choice is the Kona Roadhouse which I have also ridden as well. The Kona would set me back about $2200 but I would get a sweet steel frame with better componentry. The downside would be additional weight and less flexibility in tire width. I believe the Kona can support up to 35mm and the Warbird goes up to 42 ish.
In either case, I am looking to buy a sturdy bike that will last a long time and that can handle most recreational riding. I do plan on jumping in an occasional group ride (Nothing too crazy 18-20mph), doing some centuries and hitting up some fire roads/gravel. I still have a 29er hardtail that I can take out to if I am itching for some single track.
I honestly dig how the Kona looks and its a bike that will be cool in 10 years and will probably hold its value. I like how the warbird rides and it does feel lighter than the Roadhouse but the deal I am getting really makes the Warbird a contender. I would more than likely purchase a second set of wheels for either bike if I got more into group rides if i felt that the knobbier tires became too cumbersome.
Anything else I am missing in my comparison?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lewisburg, TN
Posts: 1,356
Bikes: Mikkelsen custom steel, Santa Cruz Chameleon SS, old trek trainer bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
I have heard that the Roadhouse is pretty stiff, and not that conducive to gravel as a result, but I have never ridden one. You have, but maybe ride it again to make sure, because that could ruin one of the uses of the bike.
I would personally go with a steel bike, but that is just my personal preference.
I would personally go with a steel bike, but that is just my personal preference.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Deskdreamer
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
15
08-16-17 03:33 PM
D-Fuzz
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
40
12-17-16 03:49 AM
ddb29
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
10
04-04-15 04:40 PM
Duke171
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
11
11-12-12 08:40 AM