Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have the option to buy a 2005 Jake the Snake for about $20 more than the 2006 Bianchi Volpe out now. The normal retail for the JTS is $1100. I'm leaning heavily toward the JTS (I've only got a 24 hour hold on it) but am still wavering. Both bikes cash in at around $800, a fairly large chunk of change for me to drop right now. I'm looking for single bike to do everything, daily commute, longer weekend rides, and possibly (if I can get fit enough) a future cross race (for fun). I live in Seattle, so there

    It seems the major differences between the JTS and the Volpe are that the JTS has an Aluminum frame and only two front chain rings, but better components (shimano 105). The Volpe is a steel frame and has three front chain rings but Shimano Tiagra and Deore components. I'm not sure how much the third front chain ring will matter during commuting/riding, I imagine it might help on some of Seattle's larger hills.

    I've ridden the Jake the Snake a bit (gonna take it on a longer ride tomorrow) and enjoyed it. I haven't taken the Volpe out as the LBS that has them in stock didn't have one built in my size yet.

    Should I jump on the JTS now? I figure if the worst case happens and I decide I need a third chain ring for larger commuting loads and big hills I could change out the front rings and derailer. And If I somehow manage to crack the aluminum frame in a few years I could always rebuild on a steel frame and reuse most of the components (I think?).

    This is my first serious bike purchase, I'm just looking for some more experienced input before I go dropping a lot of money (for me). I'm not dead set on the Volpe if the JTS is not the way to go, but my budget does top out at about $800 pre-tax. The Surley cross-check is also appealing...

    thanks!
    Last edited by rlotz; 08-31-05 at 12:32 AM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    My Bikes
    2001 Trek XO1, 2009 Ridley Crossbow
    Posts
    185
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would go with the Kona JtS, if it was up to me. A bunch of fellows on our CX team own them & really like their bikes. By far, the best bang for the buck!
    Give generously to The Heart & Stroke Foundation http://ww2.heartandstroke.ca/
    Keep on running & 'cross at RunningMania.com http://www.runningmania.com/forum/vi...15813&start=50
    Proud supporter of local shops!

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    211
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    get the surly. more options, cheaper. cant go wrong. the jts is made for racing, so it might be more than you need right now. plus, if you want to, you can always race the surly.

  4. #4
    Rabbinic Authority
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Silver Spring, MD (MABRA/MAC)
    My Bikes
    Cannondale Cyclocross, Specialized Langster, Giant TCR-C2 Composite
    Posts
    650
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If your choice is only between the JTS and the Volpe, disregard the components for a second and just think about the frame which is the core of the bicycle. For the mix of riding you describe, I'd take an aluminum frame over a steel frame. I personally wouldn't want to take the risk of rust, especially on a cross/commuting/road bike that might see rain, snow, mud, water, and dirt.

    As for the components, granny rings (tiny third chainrings up front) are for grannys and masochist MTBs who like to ride up grades that I usually use my rock climbing gear for. Tiny gears don't help you climb better, good form and a good body help you climb better. And besides, the more you ride, the more you'll favor higher gears anyway.

    I'd say, personally, choose the JTS over the Volpe, and give the Surly serious consideration if you can find it. Otherwise, jump on the JTS and consider purchasing an extra pair of wheels to use on the road.
    "Trails are for cyclocross bikes and mountain bikes only. Hiking and Horse Back riding is strictly prohibited. Horses will be confiscated and shot."

    Visit my blog: The Complete Jewish Cyclist (http://www.thecompletejewishcyclist.blogspot.com/)

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jpearl
    I'd say, personally, choose the JTS over the Volpe, and give the Surly serious consideration if you can find it. Otherwise, jump on the JTS and consider purchasing an extra pair of wheels to use on the road.
    So now it seems like its down to a Surly or JTS. I'll have to do more hunting for a Surly, so far I haven't found anyone that has one in stock. Unfortunately going with the Surly would probably mean I could only afford Tiagra components instead of the 105s.

  6. #6
    Rabbinic Authority
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Silver Spring, MD (MABRA/MAC)
    My Bikes
    Cannondale Cyclocross, Specialized Langster, Giant TCR-C2 Composite
    Posts
    650
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The difference between Tiagra and 105 is nominal, and you wouldn't notice it at all. My Cannondale Cyclocross has a mix of Tiagra, 105, Truvative, and other stuff. It could be Dura-Ace and I would barely notice the difference. The frame is the most important component, and the JTS has a nice frame and mix of parts to get started.

    Remember, Kona is a big player in the Cyclocross game. One of thier sponsered riders, Ryan Trembon (spelled a little wrong on the last name I think), is one of the top riders in the country. The Kona guys get lots of good feedback from thier pro riders as to what to put into the bike, and bikes like the JTS are well recieved by the CX crowd.

    Now go get the JTS already. You'll have crazy amounts of fun with it. Eventually you'll play with the parts and start buying lighter and better components as your riding improves.
    "Trails are for cyclocross bikes and mountain bikes only. Hiking and Horse Back riding is strictly prohibited. Horses will be confiscated and shot."

    Visit my blog: The Complete Jewish Cyclist (http://www.thecompletejewishcyclist.blogspot.com/)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •