Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Recreational Cyclocross and Gravelbiking This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like :The Dirty Kanza". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-01-05, 05:33 PM   #1
cxtriguy
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hi All,
Any advice on the "best bang for buck" bike? I've never tried CX. I have 2 LBS. For crossbikes, one carries specialized, the other, Kona. Difficult to get an unbiased opinion. I do IM racing, so will mostly use bike for crosstraining (hitting ther trails) and commuting. I could get hooked, so I won't rule out a CX race. Thanks.
cxtriguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-05, 06:01 PM   #2
druidh
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'd say check the gearing first. I was after a Tricross as a road all-rounder but lack of top-and bottom end ruled it out for me. Going for Kona Sutra instead.
druidh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-05, 09:28 PM   #3
jpearl
Rabbinic Authority
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD (MABRA/MAC)
Bikes: Cannondale Cyclocross, Specialized Langster, Giant TCR-C2 Composite
Posts: 650
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Both bikes have excellent cyclocross pedigrees, as both companies sposer and recieve design feedback from top competative cyclocrossers. You can't go wrong with either bike, but here are some pointers that can help you decide which bike to go with:

1. Test ride both bikes, see which one you feel more comfortable on and which one you feel more in control of.

2. Disregard the componant selection, the frame and the fork are the most important elements of any bike. Don't get too hung up on parts, as they tend to take a beating on 'cross bikes and get replaced more often. The only components that are truly critical on a stock cyclocross bike are the wheels and if it's a deciding factor then get the one with the stronger wheels.
jpearl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-05, 02:46 PM   #4
cxtriguy
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for the advice.
The JTS comes with a easton ultralite race frame, the tricross uses A1 premium aluminum. I don't know which is better. The Specialized comes with a carbon (FACT) fork, while the kona uses the project 2. I'm assuming carbon would be better, how about the frame? Thanks.
cxtriguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-05, 03:33 PM   #5
scotj
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
OK admittedly I have not looked at the price on a built Specialized TriCross, but I know the frame was supposed to retail for $1199. To build up the Specialized would bring the total cost to between $2000 and $2500. JTS cost about $1,200 for the whole bike! Do you really want to pay over $2,000 for a bike your going ride some trails on and commute with? Buy the JTS and ride and race it for one year, if you like cyclocross racing upgrade the fork on the JTS and get a new set a wheels, or sell the JTS for $800 or $900 dollars on E-Bay and get the Specialized. Also consider a Felt, Giant, Alan and Bianchi they all make competitive high quality cross bikes.
scotj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-05, 05:07 PM   #6
NealH 
Senior Member
 
NealH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Triangle, NC
Bikes: S-Works Tarmac
Posts: 1,455
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
I have not ridden the JTS but, I have ridden the Tricross and was particularly impressed with the ride and handling. It exhudes a sturdy, efficient and quiet feel. The ride is well damped and, almost plush. Really a fine and pleasant road feel - due mainly to the fatter tires I am pretty sure. It strikes me as being an excellent all around type bike. I would take it down the mud-run, over the mountain or on a Sunday morning century without thinking twice. As a matter of fact, just as soon as the "Comp" model is released in 61cm I plan to procure one.

The Tricross has some other nice benefits too. The fork can take a rack as well as the rear end. Fenders too. And it will take fat, fat tires to boot. I like it.
NealH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-05, 01:29 PM   #7
Doctor Who
Lotion/Basket/Hose
 
Doctor Who's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chicago
Bikes: 1992 Schwinn Paramount
Posts: 1,368
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by scotj
OK admittedly I have not looked at the price on a built Specialized TriCross, but I know the frame was supposed to retail for $1199.
I believe you're thinking of the S-Works Tricross frame. The "regular" variations of the Tricross are available for a similar price, but ready to roll.
Doctor Who is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:57 PM.