Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    33
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Another fork question

    I have a steel frame that I am incrementally changing for cyclocross. With a steel frame, would an aluminum fork work fine since the frame already does a good job of absorbing the shock or would it still be worth it to go with a carbon fork? Nashbar has their carbon fork on sale, but I also saw a Redline al fork for basically 100 bucks. I thought if I could, I'd save sixty bucks or so, but if the extra $$ for a carbon fork is worth it, then I'd consider that as well. Thanks!

    --happy mudding, er--riding!

  2. #2
    Senior Member graff71884's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    St. Louis (Home) & Columbia, MO (School @ Mizzou)
    My Bikes
    06' Trek 2100
    Posts
    136
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Go for the carbon, then you wont have any question. Or if ya want, you can buy the carbon fork, send it to me, and I'll send you the aluminum fork off my X01!
    1. 08' Giant Anthem 1 - Blue/Silver
    2. 08' Specialized Tarmac Pro - Black/Gold
    3. 06' Custom Gunnar Crosshairs - Sterling Silver

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    33
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by graff71884
    Go for the carbon, then you wont have any question. Or if ya want, you can buy the carbon fork, send it to me, and I'll send you the aluminum fork off my X01!
    Nice try!

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Sunny Tampa, Florida
    Posts
    952
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The aluminum fork isn't going to be _bad_ it just won't be mojo-jojo ultra-sexy-cool. It's just a fork. Remember you're riding on dirt with soft tires, we aren't in the world of small pebbles making the frame jitter of 19mm tires pumped to 130psi.

    Ron

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    the loop
    My Bikes
    Spooky Metal Head ,Kona Stinky Primo,SE Flovel flyer,Bianchi Cross,Waterford Track,Fuji Track
    Posts
    180
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by graff71884
    Go for the carbon, then you wont have any question. Or if ya want, you can buy the carbon fork, send it to me, and I'll send you the aluminum fork off my X01!
    WHAT CARBON FORK WOULD YOU RECOMEND?

  6. #6
    Senior Member graff71884's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    St. Louis (Home) & Columbia, MO (School @ Mizzou)
    My Bikes
    06' Trek 2100
    Posts
    136
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There are many carbon forks made for CX bikes. Just a couple to mention Alpha Q, Winwood, and Wound Up. I would like to have any of the 3, especially the Alpha Q, I just don't have the money to buy a carbon fork right now.
    1. 08' Giant Anthem 1 - Blue/Silver
    2. 08' Specialized Tarmac Pro - Black/Gold
    3. 06' Custom Gunnar Crosshairs - Sterling Silver

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    fogtown...san francisco
    My Bikes
    rock lobster, rock lobster, serotta, ritchey, kestrel, paramount
    Posts
    2,270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ronsonic
    The aluminum fork isn't going to be _bad_ it just won't be mojo-jojo ultra-sexy-cool. It's just a fork. Remember you're riding on dirt with soft tires, we aren't in the world of small pebbles making the frame jitter of 19mm tires pumped to 130psi.

    Ron
    I tend to agree, I've looking at pics from cross races, most of the racers are just using steel or alum forks. I'm a big fan of carbon forks on road bikes, but with low pressure tires, I don't see the big advantage of having carbon cross fork other than the bling factor.
    fogriderlooking for sun

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    33
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Another question regarding carbon vs. aluminum:

    I use this bike for an off-road duathlon that is mainly double track or cyclo-cross type off-road but does contain a short portion of single-track. Would a carbon fork work for something like that or would it be too brittle and susceptible to breaking? Thanks.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    2,408
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    http://cgi.ebay.com/Winwood-Muddy-Ca...QQcmdZViewItem

    Nothing BAD about that aluminum fork but if you're going through the process of changing the fork then by all means get the best you can.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    727
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The biggest advantage of a carbon fork on a cross bike is weight. While I haven't weighed it, the steel fork that came on my Poprad feels like it weighs at least 1kg.

    On a bike I didn't have to lift up and throw over my shoulder who knows how many times per lap for 30+ minutes (lowly cat 4/C here) I wouldn't necessarily mind so much, but this is such a bike, and I do mind.

    With that said, I've still got the original steel fork on, because I'm much to cheap (and broke) to buy anything else right now.
    i ride bikes.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    fogtown...san francisco
    My Bikes
    rock lobster, rock lobster, serotta, ritchey, kestrel, paramount
    Posts
    2,270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by fore
    The biggest advantage of a carbon fork on a cross bike is weight. While I haven't weighed it, the steel fork that came on my Poprad feels like it weighs at least 1kg.

    On a bike I didn't have to lift up and throw over my shoulder who knows how many times per lap for 30+ minutes (lowly cat 4/C here) I wouldn't necessarily mind so much, but this is such a bike, and I do mind.

    With that said, I've still got the original steel fork on, because I'm much to cheap (and broke) to buy anything else right now.
    I agree that weight is an issue, but check the weight of those carbon cross forks, unless you spend big bucks, don't expect to save that much weight. don't get me wrong, you will save something...with a $329 reynolds cross fork, it going weigh 500 grams...many other carbon forks will weigh over 600 grams.
    fogriderlooking for sun

  12. #12
    Senior Member jeremyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Sacramento CA
    My Bikes
    Raleigh Grand Prix, Cervelo P3alu
    Posts
    534
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you buy a carbon fork because you want a lighter bike and because you want a very cool looking bike.

    carbon doesnt necessarily equal lighter though.

    And there are more carbon options than mentioned above.

    Kuota
    Alpha Q
    WoundUp
    Easton---one of the lightest
    Reynolds
    Redline
    4za/Python---another ultralight contender
    Winwood (save your money and just get a real carbon fork from above)

    The stock carbon fork that came on my specialized Tricross was beefcake at 770 grams (very heavy). My Woundup weighs 595 with 9.25 steerer tube (not superlight). I'm in the process of ordering a Kuota Mud fork which comes in at like 520 grams for the same size steerer.

    You can ride singletrack on a carbon cx fork, so long as youre not 250 lbs and going off 3 foot drops. I've never heard of one breaking.

    The redline carbon can be had cheap ($175) and it looks pretty cool too.

    jeremyb

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •