Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    SpecOps-27 Emerson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    My Bikes
    Surly Crosscheck
    Posts
    206
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Surly Crosscheck weight

    This is semi-crossposted from commuting. Sorry if that is a problem, I though the 'cross folks would have good info.

    Hi all,

    I'm thinking about a Crosscheck--my LBS has a lightly used frame for $350 (is that a good used price). I've read what I could on-line about the Surly. Everyone loves the bike, but a lot of folks complain about how heavy it is.

    The other bikes I'm considering are the Soma Doublecross, the Gunnar Crosshairs, and the Specialized Tricross. I called Speedgoat and they say the Surly is maybe a pound or so heavier than the Gunnar. I get that a pound is a big deal if you are racing, but doesn't seem like much for other types of riding--and a small part of the total weight of the bike. I'd like the bike to be 22-24 lbs.

    I'm hoping to use the bike for year-round commuting, light touring, a little off-road, and all-around riding. The final piece of the puzzle and the reason I'm even thinking about weight is my seriously screwed-up back--two surgeries so far. I need a pretty light bike if I want to be able lift it myself (like to put on my car.) This back stuff also means I need to get the bars (pretty set on the Jones H-bar) higher than the saddle by an inch or two.

    So, any opinions on the various bikes--advantages or disadvantages? Anyone actually know the weight of their Crosscheck. Did you choose one of the above bikes over the Crosscheck for some reason? Any and all information is appreciated. This is a big purchase for me and I want to get it right.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Washington, DC
    My Bikes
    2006 Specialized S-Works Tricross
    Posts
    462
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Emerson
    The final piece of the puzzle and the reason I'm even thinking about weight is my seriously screwed-up back--two surgeries so far. I need a pretty light bike if I want to be able lift it myself (like to put on my car.)
    I can't imagine a few pounds of bike weight one way or the other is going to make any difference in your ability to lift it or not. I suggest using a trunck rack rather than a roof rack. That way you only have to lift the bike a few inches of the ground.

    P.S. - Doing the Tricross myself.

  3. #3
    I'm Carbon Curious 531phile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Earthquake Central
    My Bikes
    Enough
    Posts
    2,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Emerson
    This is semi-crossposted from commuting. Sorry if that is a problem, I though the 'cross folks would have good info.

    Hi all,

    I'm thinking about a Crosscheck--my LBS has a lightly used frame for $350 (is that a good used price). I've read what I could on-line about the Surly. Everyone loves the bike, but a lot of folks complain about how heavy it is.

    The other bikes I'm considering are the Soma Doublecross, the Gunnar Crosshairs, and the Specialized Tricross. I called Speedgoat and they say the Surly is maybe a pound or so heavier than the Gunnar. I get that a pound is a big deal if you are racing, but doesn't seem like much for other types of riding--and a small part of the total weight of the bike. I'd like the bike to be 22-24 lbs.

    I'm hoping to use the bike for year-round commuting, light touring, a little off-road, and all-around riding. The final piece of the puzzle and the reason I'm even thinking about weight is my seriously screwed-up back--two surgeries so far. I need a pretty light bike if I want to be able lift it myself (like to put on my car.) This back stuff also means I need to get the bars (pretty set on the Jones H-bar) higher than the saddle by an inch or two.

    So, any opinions on the various bikes--advantages or disadvantages? Anyone actually know the weight of their Crosscheck. Did you choose one of the above bikes over the Crosscheck for some reason? Any and all information is appreciated. This is a big purchase for me and I want to get it right.
    Hey, do yourself a favor and save $300 bucks. Buy a old Schwinn World Sport, it's basically the same frame and geometry. It has 4130 main tubes. It'll weight about the same, maybe even lighter. It'll have lugs. It has plenty of tire clearance for tire up to 38c maybe 40c. You can find them at yard sales and flea markets. The surly has more tire clearance, but for $50 you're getting something that basically Surly copied. The spacing is 126mm, but it's steel so you can easily spread that sucker to 130mm easy.

    Surly build bikes from generic 4130 tubing from China. Nothing fancy. They use to build Crosschecks out of Reynolds 631 for the first year or so, but quickly move onto 4130 since it's cheaper.

    Quote Originally Posted by avner View Post
    I loled. Twice. Then I cried. Then I rubbed one out and cried again, but thanks for sharing.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    fogtown...san francisco
    My Bikes
    Ron Cooper, Time VXSR, rock lobster, rock lobster, serotta, ritchey, kestrel, paramount
    Posts
    2,276
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 531phile
    Hey, do yourself a favor and save $300 bucks. Buy a old Schwinn World Sport, it's basically the same frame and geometry. It has 4130 main tubes. It'll weight about the same, maybe even lighter. It'll have lugs. It has plenty of tire clearance for tire up to 38c maybe 40c. You can find them at yard sales and flea markets. The surly has more tire clearance, but for $50 you're getting something that basically Surly copied. The spacing is 126mm, but it's steel so you can easily spread that sucker to 130mm easy.

    Surly build bikes from generic 4130 tubing from China. Nothing fancy. They use to build Crosschecks out of Reynolds 631 for the first year or so, but quickly move onto 4130 since it's cheaper.
    ouch! clearly surly has designed a bike that is better than the old schwinn world sport! true the 4130 is pretty much the low end of tubing scale...but if weight is not a issue, people love it. they've designed a bike that rides and handles well that is affordable and serve their owners well.
    fogriderlooking for sun

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I built my Cross Check with all Ultegra, thomson stem and posts and Veloce wheels. It is very light! That reminds me... I haven't weighted that SOB!

  6. #6
    Eschew Obfuscation! enduro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    over here!
    My Bikes
    2005 Rocky Mountain ETSX, Surly Crosscheck, 2000 Enduro Expert (sold), 1999 Rockhopper, 1984 Trek 520 (STOLEN-but recovered!), $7 rigid MTB from a police auction (broken, then stolen)
    Posts
    591
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That is an awfully high price for a used frameset, I got a brand new one from Universal Cycles for about $340.

    I chose the Crosscheck over the Soma Doublecross because the Crosscheck has clearance for much wider tires, is very plain looking, and the thicker walled 4130 tubing can be banged around a bit more.
    Hates M &M's because they are so hard to peel.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •