Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Recreational Cyclocross and Gravelbiking This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like :The Dirty Kanza". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-25-03, 04:28 PM   #1
urbanrider
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
urbanrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Halifax, Canada
Bikes:
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Trek XO1

I presently ride a Trek 4900 but I'm considering a the Trek XO1 or the Trek Touring 520 for short to medium tours
I'm not considering ultra long rides (in excess of 300 kms.)
What are the advantages/disadvantages of each bike for this type of riding.

More endurance then speed!

Thanks in Advance:confused:
urbanrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-03, 05:56 PM   #2
Rotifer
WallaWalla!
 
Rotifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Walla Walla, WA
Bikes:
Posts: 823
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I don't know much about either of them but, on checking out the Trek site, I'd say we're talking apples and oranges here. The XO1 is a relatively aggressive aluminum bike. While the 520 is your classic steel touring bike. I imagine, with cyclocross tires, the 520 would be enjoyable on the trail. If you want something you may want to strip the rack off and hit a cross race (or you just like speed) consider the OX1. If you want something that will dampen your ride with a full load of gear, get the 520.
__________________
Jeff
Rotifer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-03, 06:20 PM   #3
Rich Clark
A Heart Needs a Home
 
Rich Clark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Bikes:
Posts: 1,387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
For long, loaded tours the 520 takes the prize without breathing hard. It has wider gearing, front lowrider braze-ons, bar-end shifters, and a more compliant, comfortable ride. It's a touring bike.

The XO1 is a nice bike and would make an excellent commuter. And you could tour on it if you wanted to, although I'd want lower low gears if I were climbing significant grades with a full load (this applies to a lesser extent to the 520 also).

The 520 has a somewhat better parts spec as well.

RichC
Rich Clark is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41 PM.