Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    wot?
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Inner Canuckistan
    My Bikes
    Gary Fisher Montare, 1973 Bottechia, IRO Jamie Roy,1998 Cervelo Eyre Tri, 1982 Peugeot Sport fixed gear, and some kind of red bike hanging in the rafters
    Posts
    364
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Any internally geared hubs suitable for cyclocross?

    or that style of riding anyway?

    Aside from a Rohloff?

    Apparently the SRAM T-3 has essentially the same efficiency as a derailleur system. But I don't know how suited it would be to hard riding.
    a life well lived is the best revenge

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by yairi
    or that style of riding anyway?

    Aside from a Rohloff?

    Apparently the SRAM T-3 has essentially the same efficiency as a derailleur system. But I don't know how suited it would be to hard riding.
    Sheldon uses the Red Brand, Ultegra level, Shimano Nexus hub on the Bianchi SanJose to make the SanJos8. He doesn't explicitly say it will hold up to cross, but he does believe it will hold up to touring.

  3. #3
    hehe... member thatguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    665
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't know, those things are HEAVY. If you're racing, don't bother.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    49
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I thought by the time you took away the 2 front chain rings, the rear cassette, some chain links, the front and rear Derailleur, the front shifter and cable that the weight was pretty much identical.

  5. #5
    Senior Member ldesfor1@ithaca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Newton Ctr. MA
    My Bikes
    2 cdale Caad7. Scatantte CX/winter bike. SS commuter.
    Posts
    2,109
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i use the red band Nexus 8 on my crosscheck, but as a commuter and so far it is great at that job. too am interested in it's viability for cross as it is not affected by mud/chainsuck and it has a suitable gear range. I plan on trying it out soon with a bit of trail riding, i'll let you know what i think. It can be shifted with out pedaling too, pretty convenient.
    Yes, it is heavy, I'm over it. That horse has been kicked. I weigh 218, a 21.8 lb bike is 10% bodyweight. How many 140 lb. guys ride 14 lb. bikes? What i mean to say is: weight is relative, and if weight is really your primary concern I'm sure that your quest for carbon and 200 gram tires would have overwhelmed any thoughts of an internal gear hub... they're just not that sexy.

    Thanks to anyone who has any real world experience with riding a gearhub in cross races.

    -Leo
    Teammates-on-Podium O'meter: 0/n (n=total # of teammates I get to race with)
    Successful Breakaway O'meter: 0/total number of races entered

    Team/Training blogness:www.thresholdcycling.com

  6. #6
    antisocialite dirtyphotons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,385
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    no experience, but also very interested.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown
    Because when fashion conflicts with function, I vote for function.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    122
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have built 30 odd or so Rohloff bicycles. I firmly believe in the hub and it has been very reliable for all my customers.

    There is a weight penalty but it is not as much as many people make it out to be. Compared to a mid level system like XT it is just a tick over a pound. Guess about 1.5 pounds for a road system. Road bikes that I have made with this hub have averaged around 22lbs. I currently ride a 29nr at 26.5lbs with the hub.

    Would this work for cyclocross. Yes and no. It would certainly work and be a very nice system to have in adverse conditions, but compared to some of the ultra light cyclo bikes, if you had to shoulder it a lot the extra weight may be an issue. If you are not racing in the top classes, I would say it’s absolutely fine.

    I think more than weight, I just love the hub for its total reliability and great shifting. Many people who pipe up about the hub have never ridden one. I think if they could give it a little time, many would see its advantages.

    Dave Bohm
    Bohemian Bicycles

  8. #8
    wot?
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Inner Canuckistan
    My Bikes
    Gary Fisher Montare, 1973 Bottechia, IRO Jamie Roy,1998 Cervelo Eyre Tri, 1982 Peugeot Sport fixed gear, and some kind of red bike hanging in the rafters
    Posts
    364
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I love the idea of the Rohloff. I can see it being the cat's meow for MTBs. What I don't love is the price, weight, and relatively poor efficiency.

    I think a 3-speed might be just the thing for me, or maybe a 4-speed. But will they stand up to sprinting, hard out-of-the-saddle climbs, etc. That is the question.
    a life well lived is the best revenge

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    122
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would think the three speed will hold up for a while. Sooner or later they will give up but they are relatively inexpensive so maybe it would be worth it.

    The price of the Rohloff is in line with other high end parts kits (XTR). Realize that it is a low production, made in Germany item and it could only get cheaper if serious cuts in materials were made and production was moved to Asia. The biggest reason they are as expensive as they are is the historically weak dollar against the Euro and the only ones we have to blame for that is ourselves (government) The Chinese dollar is basically locked with our own and therefore affords us beneficial trade.

    Efficiency? The Rohloff is the most efficient gear hub ever produced. Naturally, certain gears are more efficient than others in the Rohloff (i.e. the direct drive gears are nearly 100% efficient) some of the other gears that go through multiple planetaries are less so. This is a condition of all gear hubs, not just the Rohloff. The T-3 is no more efficient than the Rohloff; then again, a three speed hub is one direct gear, one under-driven and over-driven gear.

    Whether a reduction in overall efficiency in 3 gears (Rohloff) over a well maintained derailleur system that is not cross-chained makes a real world difference? I haven't noticed it for the kind of riding I do.

    Weight, yes its heavier. I do believe you may see a lighter hub at some point but some longevity will be sacrificed to achieve this. The SRAM 3 is not that light either. Wonder if you would really save much?

    Dave Bohm
    Bohemian Bicycles

  10. #10
    wot?
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Inner Canuckistan
    My Bikes
    Gary Fisher Montare, 1973 Bottechia, IRO Jamie Roy,1998 Cervelo Eyre Tri, 1982 Peugeot Sport fixed gear, and some kind of red bike hanging in the rafters
    Posts
    364
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    By no means arguing that the Rohloff isn't worth the price, I'm quite sure it is, I just don't have the wherewithal at the moment

    The efficiency of several of these hubs has been quite thoroughly tested - see here. The SRAM T-3 was the best in this test; however, the example they used had been relubricated with light oil instead of the usual grease. A similarly treated Sturmey AW was right on its heels. The Rohloff was generally superior to the Shimano and Sturmey 7-speeds. Now, I know that the AW has had trouble with jumping out of gear under strain ... I wish I knew whether the SRAM had similar issues. I also wish I could remember where it was that I heard about a fix for that problem.

    By the way Dave that tandem you showed at NAHBS was completely mind-bending. Nicely done.
    a life well lived is the best revenge

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    122
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thank you for the paper, I had not seen that before. Very informative.

    I would say, and it was mentioned in the paper that breaking in a speedhub is critical to how it feels.

    This is just personal experience. I have no way to test it, but a Speedhub becomes much smoother in time. Enough that you can definitely feel the difference.

    I have spoken to Bernie, the inventor of the Speedhub and he says this is true. The hub is built super tight and none of the gears are pre-polished or pre-run in at the factory. The reason? It would increase the cost even more as would helical gears which would decrease noise. So he leaves it to us, the rider to do the work of breaking in the hub through riding it.

    It takes a long time. IMHO at least 1000 mi. I have ridden hubs with over 20k miles and they even feel a lot better than the 1000mi ones. So I wonder if a Sram is more efficient from the start only because its tolerances are so much lower than the Speedhub? And therefore has less friction. It would be interesting to test a brand new speedhub vs. a well worn in hub and see if that actually has an effect on efficiency. It certainly has a huge effect on noise and shifting ease (well broken in hubs are substantially quieter and easier to shift than new ones)

    Also, there has been an update to the seals since that test and this has had an effect on initial drag in the hub. It is something that I could tell when they made the change but I don't know if that would effect efficiency or not.

    BTW, a small tidbit. The same company that makes the gears for Mercedes Benz also makes the gears for the Rohloff hub.

    Thank you for the compliment on the tandem. It is quite fun to ride. Hopefully, that hub will break in twice as fast with double the torque through it....maybe

  12. #12
    Made in Norway Lectron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,632
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think Rohloff is totally worth the price, and compared to a full XT group, the weight penalty ain't huge. The weight distribution however is an other thing, and changing wheels is slightly more expensive.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Dude
    Weight weenieness is a disease very often caused by the lack of good results. Just a few steps below doping in terms of desperation

  13. #13
    Made in Norway Lectron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,632
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dbohemian
    Road bikes that I have made with this hub have averaged around 22lbs. I currently ride a 29nr at 26.5lbs with the hub.
    Road bikes? What shift levers did you go for?
    Quote Originally Posted by The Dude
    Weight weenieness is a disease very often caused by the lack of good results. Just a few steps below doping in terms of desperation

  14. #14
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,177
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by thatguy
    I don't know, those things are HEAVY. If you're racing, don't bother.
    While the hub is heavy, the rest of the drivetrain isn't. Remember, you are loosing the cassette and rear der. The chain is also much shorter and lighter. If you go just 8 sp, you also loose the ft der. I would venture to say the increased weight of the hub is offset by the decrease of parts.

    Tim
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    122
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cs1
    If you go just 8 sp, you also loose the ft der. I would venture to say the increased weight of the hub is offset by the decrease of parts. Tim
    14 speeds!

    Here is a entry I made to the Tandem list comparing weight of the hub. at least on tandems.

    *****************************************************************

    "We were speaking of the Weight of a Rohloff internally geared hub on another thread and it got me interested exactly what the difference was so I calculated it.

    I went to weightweenies.com for the numbers.

    I compared hub, cassette, front/rear mech, shifter/brake levers and cranks

    1. First example is shimano XT/ultegra with a rear disk option,

    2581 grms or 5.69lbs

    2. All dura ace, hugi hub, non disk

    2243grm or 4.94 lbs

    3. Rohloff disk version, lightweight double crank, and cane creek brake levers, includes shifter

    2681 grm or 5.91lbs"


    ********************************************************

    It gives a rough idea.

    Dave Bohm
    Bohemian Bicycles

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    122
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Lectron
    Road bikes? What shift levers did you go for?
    I just use the standard Rohloff shifter. I cut down the handlebar a few inches, if needed. I then machine a sleeve that goes into the end of the drop bar and bond it there permanently. Then I slip the shifter over it.

    It is my favorite spot and a natural one to use. I guess I am dating myself in that I am familiar with bar end shifters so just dropping you right or left hand is normal.

    I know people people love the built in brake/shifters but there is no way to make anything like that work with the Speedhub, it just pulls way to much cable.

    Dave Bohm
    Bohemian Bicycles

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •