Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Salsa - Chili Con Crosso vs. Las Cruces

    Looking to build my first CX Bike. I transistioned from Mnt Biking then to Road riding and now CX. Does anybody know the difference between Salsa'S - Chili Con Crosso vs. Las Cruces? Thanks for your help. Looking forward to getting one built...

    Cheers

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    fogtown...san francisco
    My Bikes
    Ron Cooper, Time VXSR, rock lobster, rock lobster, serotta, ritchey, kestrel, paramount
    Posts
    2,276
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    this is the first I've seen the Chili Con Crosso...I've seen the Las Cruces at the races, but I've not ridden it. it looks like the difference is the Chili is a semi sloping toptube (with flat spot for shouldering the bike) and it does not come with a fork. I had a salsa campeon and the weakness in the frame set was the fork...it was way over a pound at a time when many forks are in the 350 gram range. it seems that the Chili is what they call their dedicated cross machine, where the Las Cruses is more of an all rounder.
    fogriderlooking for sun

  3. #3
    1coolrider arcticbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    452
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm building a Chili now. One difference is that the Los Cruces has disc mounts in the rear, the Chili doesn't. I decided to stick w/ the cantis and go with the Chili. I have the frame and it's very nice. Good craftsmenship & excellent paint job. I'm still gathering all my other components. I ended up buying the Ritchey WCS Carbon Cross fork. Still looking for wheels.

    Good luck with your decision.
    Arcticbiker

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think that another difference is the rear dropout spacing. The las cruces is 135 so you need an mtb hub. Although I know a couple of guys with that bike that just clamp it down on a 130.

    I believe that the chili spacing is 130, but you might want to double check.

  5. #5
    The mods changed this... damocles1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2,348
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I use a 130 wheel in my Las Cruces...no issues...

    The spacing IS 135, but you can just tighten the skewer...

  6. #6
    bac
    bac is offline
    Senior Member bac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    My Bikes
    Too many to list!
    Posts
    7,487
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by B RAD
    Looking to build my first CX Bike. I transistioned from Mnt Biking then to Road riding and now CX. Does anybody know the difference between Salsa'S - Chili Con Crosso vs. Las Cruces? Thanks for your help. Looking forward to getting one built...

    Cheers
    Sorry, I cannot help you with the differences, but I do own a Las Cruces. It's a solid steed, and perhaps my favorite bike. Good luck with your choice - I don't know that you can go wrong with either.


    .... Brad

  7. #7
    nep
    nep is offline
    Just Plain
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    45
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Chile has more tube shaping on the top tube and the stays for easy shouldering and a plush ride. It has 130mm rear spacing and a sloping TT with no disc mounts or fork (get an ouzo pro!). Those are the differences... besides the color and name (las cruces is soo much better!). If you want a Las Cruces, get one soon cause they're discontinued! Enjoy which ever one you pick!
    Lefty Tighty Righty Loosey

  8. #8
    Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What size did you get in the Chili? I am 5'10" short torso/long legs and currently ride a short Look with a 54.5 TT(hor). I been told I should ride the 51 (local shop thought), 49(I thought) or 47(Salsa thought). Any insight would be great!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •