Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Recreational Cyclocross and Gravelbiking This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like :The Dirty Kanza". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-02-07, 07:14 AM   #1
nikvdw
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
nikvdw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Paoli PA
Bikes: Trek 7.7 fx & 29er Cannondale
Posts: 22
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Buying a Cross Bike ; Sizing and Bike Choice.. Scott/Cannondale/Fuji

I have ridden a mountain bike exclusively for 5 years, and need a change since relocating to the Chester County PA area...cyclocross bikes look great, and knowing my competitive nature, may race when its gets colder out...I rode one yesterday a L Scott Team Comp, felt like i would break the thing in half, is my weight and strength a problem?

I am 5'9" inches 200-205 lbs, slowly losing weight after a shoulder surgery 10 months ago. Probably will settle in around 190-195. I am a 32" inseam. I realize there is no formula but a 52 or 54 mm frame, and can someone comment on the durability of any of the following frames for 190-200 lbers?

Scott Team versus Cannondale Disc versus Fuji Cross.

Thanks!
nikvdw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-07, 08:08 AM   #2
idcruiserman
Mmmmm potatoes
 
idcruiserman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Idaho
Bikes:
Posts: 1,921
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Your weight is not an issue. I'm only familiar with the Cannondale, but the others should be fine, too. As long as you have some standover, size the bike based on top tube. Standover on the Optimo disc is 32" for the 52 and 31.6" for the 50.
idcruiserman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-07, 09:42 AM   #3
flargle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 2,118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikvdw View Post
I realize there is no formula
There are in fact many formulas. Lennard Zinn has a nice frame-size calculator on his web site:
http://zinncycles.com/FitIntro.aspx
I found the results from a careful set of measurements (aided by my wife) input into the Zinn calculator jibed very closely with the results I got from an in-store fitting (using the bikefitting.com system). Which then resulted in a very nicely fitting bicycle.

The Zinn gives results for a traditional bike, you have to do a bit of fudging for bikes with slanted top tubes, but then again most makers give a "theoretical top tube" number that can be used for comparison. I wish the makers also gave a "theoretical seat tube" figure as well.

Standover is a pretty useless metric for choosing frame size.

Here is a thought-provoking article on bike frame sizing:
http://www.rivbike.com/how_to_pick_y...g_a_frame_size
flargle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-07, 02:26 PM   #4
nikvdw
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
nikvdw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Paoli PA
Bikes: Trek 7.7 fx & 29er Cannondale
Posts: 22
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I ended buying a Fuji Cross comp, "54" after a whirlwind education on cross frame sizes. I rode the 56 and it seemed a bit large, so the 54 should be about right. time will tell
nikvdw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:13 PM.