Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    CHOICES TREK XO1 or KONA JAKE

    So having a choice problem. Am bidding on imaculate XO1 2001 online or can get a 2003 SH Jake for 500 (halfprice)

    I come from Mountain bike back ground - race a Klein hardtail - so a harsher ride isnt the problem. I am looking to use the bike for commuting (short <10 miles) but also want to put panniers on for 6 week trip around C*BA - carrying around 15kilos. Can anyone tell me the differences between these bikes? Ride characteristics, strength etc.

    Many thanks

    Richard

  2. #2
    Senior Member roadrage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't have much experience with the Trek, but the Jake is a great bike and would be good for the riding you describe. Also, makes a great trail bike and handles singletrack too. Kona's are usually built well and from my experience, can take the abuse.

  3. #3
    human velocipedio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    living in the moment
    My Bikes
    2005 Litespeed Teramo, 2000 Marinoni Leggero, 2001 Kona Major Jake (with Campy Centaur), 1997 Specialized S-Works M2, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper
    Posts
    3,563
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    there's no comparison. the kona is a real cross bike. the trek is a bike that looks like a cross bike. the kona has an easton ultralite frame and shimano 105 components, the trek has sora on a generic aluminum frame.
    when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.

    The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
    Cycling irregularly since 2002

  4. #4
    Senior Member AlanK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Seattle, WA (United States)
    Posts
    482
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I know this is probably a late reply, but I thought I'd give you my two cents. I have a 2001 XO with 2002 components. I've generally been happy with it, though it is more of a general purpose road bike than an actual cyclocross. It's been very reliable, and overall I'm happy with it. The only real complaint I have is the geometry; the top tube is kind of long, making the bike somewhat uncomfortable for long rides.

    I discovered Jake the Snake recently, and it looks like a very good choice. It has a durable, light frame and a comfortable, upright riding position (sort of unusual for a cyclocross bike). The only thing I'd be worried about for your intended usage is the gearing; if your using it for any kind of commuting or touring, the gearing is pretty high. It's pretty easy to switch out the rear cassette, though.

    Another bike I've looked at is the Lemond Propad. It's also a versatile cyclocross bike. It's set up is similar to Jake the Snake, but the Propad has a Reynolds steel frame - which of course makes it a little heavy, but more comfortable. Good luck whatever you decide

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    151
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd get the Kona.It's a nice 'cross bike.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •