Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: MTB Drawbacks?

  1. #1
    Rhymes With Bike Schiek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    1,221
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    MTB Drawbacks?

    Other than upsetting purist sensibilities, what are the disadvantages to competing with a mountainbike as opposed to a cross bike? Sorry if this is well traveled ground, but I'm new to the sport and haven't found a similar thread. Thanks.

  2. #2
    idontbelievetyler OKC_cross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Oklahoma City OK
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Weight is one, rolling resistance another, no power-sucking suspension another. A decently outfitted cross bike will tip the scales much less than a mtn bike. You'll definently feel the difference on a course with a steep run-up. The big mtn bike tires may make for a smoother ride but that is a lot of rubber in contact with the ground and more contact means more resistance. When you accelerate, none of the energy transfer to your pedals is sucked up by the suspension. If you have a lockout suspension, that will help a little but then again that takes us back to the whole weight thing.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    151
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ok so say you have a 19 pound hardtail mtn.bike with a rigid fork and Conti 1.5 tires.Let's say you use a double chainring in the front like a 48/36.When you shoulder the bike the bottom of the saddle sits on your shoulder instead of a cross bike's top tube.How much of a difference now?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    55
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Limba
    Ok so say you have a 19 pound hardtail mtn.bike with a rigid fork and Conti 1.5 tires.Let's say you use a double chainring in the front like a 48/36.When you shoulder the bike the bottom of the saddle sits on your shoulder instead of a cross bike's top tube.How much of a difference now?

    Definitly getting better, but I find that my 30mm cross tires always roll a lot faster than my mountain tires (admittidly only 1.9 semi-slicks) - I think the course layout probably decides how much of an advantage it is. A course with a lot of pavement is going to favor the better rolling 700c wheels more, wheras some courses might actually be faster with the mountain bike (causing some consternation among cross purists). Carrying the bike (as I often have to do) the lighter bike is really nice.

    Depending on your wheels too, you might end up carrying less. My cross bike has fewer places to collect mud than my FS mountain bike, and the wheels (cosmic elites) V section sheds better, so I probably carry less mud overall.

    However, all of this is assuming identical riders, etc. Truthfully, the engine makes things go, and as many in this forum have pointed out, the weight/style/ride/material of the bike really is secondary to the engine. Ride what you can afford, and are comfortable on.

    murph

  5. #5
    idontbelievetyler OKC_cross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Oklahoma City OK
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A 19 lb mtn bike hardtail with a set up like that sounds like a great rig and if that is what you race on then you probably have no problems. However, if you are going to go to all that effort (fork change, tire swap), why not just get a cross rig? Then if you want to go ride a good mtn bike trail you wont have to swap all that stuff back.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    151
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No I don't own that bike.I was just curious how much of a disadvantage it would be if you had a really nice mtn.bike.My mtn.bike is about 24 pounds even with a rigid fork.I wouldn't want to lift that bike in a race.

  7. #7
    Chi
    Chi is offline
    Rides with Cows Chi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Fixing a flat
    My Bikes
    Trek 7000
    Posts
    1,232
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    19 pound mountain bike sounds like a real expensive machine ...

  8. #8
    human velocipedio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    living in the moment
    My Bikes
    2005 Litespeed Teramo, 2000 Marinoni Leggero, 2001 Kona Major Jake (with Campy Centaur), 1997 Specialized S-Works M2, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper
    Posts
    3,563
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    actually, if you swap the suspension fork for a rigid fork, and go down to 1.5" or 1.3" tires, you could probably turn a pretty ordinary upper-end mtb into a 19-lb bike.
    when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.

    The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
    Cycling irregularly since 2002

  9. #9
    Rhymes With Bike Schiek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    1,221
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the feedback. I have put the 1.5 contis on my bike, which has made a huge improvement over the knobby 2.0s I was running. I will probably pass on swapping out the fork. I can learn on the setup I have, and would rather put the money towards a cross rig.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •