Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

Recreational Cyclocross and Gravelbiking This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like :The Dirty Kanza". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-03-08, 09:48 AM   #1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Which frame material?

I would like to build a cross bike/commuter bike, used mainly for cruising around, no real cross racing, just fun. I'm unsure about which frame material would be best. I could buy something like a Redline Conquest Pro alum frame, or buy something like a Felt F1X complete for about the price I could build one (with Campy Centaur or my current Chorus stuff as I replace it). Would an aluminum frame be too rigid when riding broken sidewalks and parking lot potholes? I was also considering something like a Soma Double Cross frame, with either the steel crown fork or a CF fork. I would also plan on putting a rear rack on it as well. Any input would be helpful. I'm in South Carolina which is pretty far removed from the cross world.
Lorcatronik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-08, 10:01 AM   #2
Body By Nintendo
Psydotek's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Videogames ruined my life. Good thing i have 2 extra lives.
Bikes: Giant TCR2, Giant TCX, IRO BFSSFG SE, Salsa Casseroll, IRO Rob Roy.
Posts: 3,187
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Aluminum is perfectly acceptable. Wider tires will decrease the harshness of the ride more than a different frame material. By using a CX/touring style frame, you'll easily be able to use 30mm wide tires (or more).

Originally Posted by jsharr View Post
A girl once asked me to give her twelve inches and make it hurt. I had to make love to her 3 times and then punch her in the nose.
Psydotek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-08, 10:11 AM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sunny Tampa, Florida
Posts: 1,252
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Whether a frame is harsh has more to do with who designed it, how and for what than the material. For what you're talking about the only thing you don't want would be an expensive race-oriented frame of any material. Doesn't matter if it's all CF or steel or what, a race bike (even a cross race bike) is rather unpleasant on bad road. My very old aluminum Redline is no more harsh than my steel road bike. Cross race bikes ride nicer than road race bikes, but neither is really suited for the riding you describe. Unless coffee shop cred is at stake, in which case I'd say change the game.

In the last 20 years or so road bikes have adopted imitation crit racer geometry and as a result a lot of cross bikes have been designed and sold for people who just want a classic road and all around bike instead of some buzzing lightweight that's fast as hell, punishes you on every RR crossing and won't take tires over 25mm wide. That is probably the sort of bike you want one of the cross bikes with fender and rack bungs and a slower geometry. You know, like there's room between the seat tube and the back tire.

Soma is said to be a nice one. There are a lot of good choices out there. Don't get locked into what you see online.
Ronsonic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-08, 04:08 PM   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,693
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Not so much for the comfort factor (you can have a comfortable frame made of any material) but I would choose steel for any non-racing purpose. I also like barcon shifters fr non-racing applications. Durable, light, and smooth. That's just me, maybe.

The surly crosscheck complete meets both of those criteria, and will take a rack. I would avoid the Felt and Redlines, from what I understand they are primarily designed as race bikes.

Realyl though if you're just on-road you don't need a cross bike at all. If you want to build frotm he frame up a surly pacer, soma smoothie or smoothie ES or Salsa Casseroll would all work great.
M_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-08, 06:57 PM   #5
500 Watts
kill.cactus's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Bikes: Trek 7200 FX ('05), Trek 6000 ('07)
Posts: 833
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Tires size and fork/frame geometry affect ride quality ENORMOUSLY more than the frame material.

I have a Jamis Ventura Elite - an alum bike with carbon seat stays and carbon fork. I used to ride 23mm tires and switched to 28mm. HUGE difference. It seriously felt as if I was riding a different bike. Combined with a slightly lower seat position it is now very comfortable!
kill.cactus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-08, 07:09 PM   #6
bsyptak's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,906
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I say remove all doubt and drawbacks and just buy ti. Oh wait, the drawback to ti is that the decals don't stay on well. Oh yeah, and they're kinda pricey. See Habanero.
bsyptak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-08, 07:34 AM   #7
Senior Member
sfcrossrider's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Francisco
Bikes: Steelman eurocross, Surly CrossCheck, IRO Rob Roy...
Posts: 2,760
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
sfcrossrider is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:31 PM.