Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    ?
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2,740
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Carbon fork over steel fork?

    https://www.nashbar.com/profile.cfm?...20Road%20Forks

    Worth it over this?

    https://www.nashbar.com/profile.cfm?...20Road%20Forks

    $90 more for carbon and over a pound weight savings. Doesn't seem worth it or does it?

  2. #2
    Have bike, will travel Barrettscv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Windy City
    My Bikes
    A road bike for every purpose
    Posts
    9,015
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The carbon fork should feel more damp and be easier on the hands. I went with a carbon fork to get a more damp ride. What frame?

    Michael
    2014 Trek DS.1: "Viaggiatore" A do-it-all bike that is waiting in Italy
    2012 Pedal Force CG2: "Secolo Bicicletta" the modern carbon fiber road bike
    2012 Pedal Force CX2: "Carbone CX" the carbon fiber CX bike
    2010 Origin 8 CX 700: "Servizio Grave" Monstercross/29er bike
    1997 Simoncini Special Cyclocross: "Little Simon" lugged Columbus steel CX bike
    1987 Serotta Nova Special X: "Azzurri" The retro Columbus SPX steel road bike

  3. #3
    ?
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2,740
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Nashbar X.
    http://www.nashbar.com/profile.cfm?c...Frames%2FBikes

    I figure it's time to put my leftover parts to good use on frame, winter is coming so one of these might be a good idea.

  4. #4
    Have bike, will travel Barrettscv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Windy City
    My Bikes
    A road bike for every purpose
    Posts
    9,015
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm considering the same project, also with the Nashbar X! I think the extra $ for the Carbon fiber is worth it. It's actually an economical way to lose a significant amount of weight. It will also help the bike ride better, important on longer trips.

    Michael
    2014 Trek DS.1: "Viaggiatore" A do-it-all bike that is waiting in Italy
    2012 Pedal Force CG2: "Secolo Bicicletta" the modern carbon fiber road bike
    2012 Pedal Force CX2: "Carbone CX" the carbon fiber CX bike
    2010 Origin 8 CX 700: "Servizio Grave" Monstercross/29er bike
    1997 Simoncini Special Cyclocross: "Little Simon" lugged Columbus steel CX bike
    1987 Serotta Nova Special X: "Azzurri" The retro Columbus SPX steel road bike

  5. #5
    Soma Lover
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Logan, UT
    My Bikes
    one bike for every day of the week
    Posts
    765
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The only reason I stuck with steel is my old school looking build would've looked all wrong with carbon.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,004
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You can find significantly lighter steel forks than that Nashbar one. Look at Tange and IRD.
    http://www.universalcycles.com/shopp...?category=1634

  7. #7
    semifreddo amartuerer 'nother's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northern CA
    My Bikes
    several
    Posts
    4,599
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When I was making a similar decision a while ago, what put me over the top was the thought of hoisting that extra pound, 2 or 3 times every lap...easily worth $90 for me.

    I haven't noticed the extra damping but I suppose it is an "on-paper" benefit. But the difference in weight is *very* noticeable.
    Can you pass the test?
    Yield to Life.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,004
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 'nother View Post
    When I was making a similar decision a while ago, what put me over the top was the thought of hoisting that extra pound, 2 or 3 times every lap...easily worth $90 for me.
    But it's important you are making the correct comparison. That Nashbar carbon fork is around 700g; you could pay less for a steel fork weighing in the 750-800g neighborhood. To get in the sub-500g carbon world, you have to pay over $200, at the very least. Meanwhile, there are other practical reasons one might prefer steel to carbon, especially for a non-racer.

    For reference:
    800g - 500g = 300g = .67 pound.
    1 pound = 454g

  9. #9
    semifreddo amartuerer 'nother's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northern CA
    My Bikes
    several
    Posts
    4,599
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by flargle View Post
    but it's important you are making the correct comparison. That nashbar carbon fork is around 700g; you could pay less for a steel fork weighing in the 750-800g neighborhood. To get in the sub-500g carbon world, you have to pay over $200, at the very least. Meanwhile, there are other practical reasons one might prefer steel to carbon, especially for a non-racer.

    For reference:
    800g - 500g = 300g = .67 pound.
    1 pound = 454g
    ok
    Can you pass the test?
    Yield to Life.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,004
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 'nother View Post
    ok
    Just to clarify, I wasn't disagreeing as much as saying you have to look at specifics. There's steel, and then there's steel; there's carbon, and then there's carbon.

    I am currently considering switching my race bike from a Tange steel fork to Origin-8 carbon. As far as I can tell, it would save about 300g, nothing to sneeze at, but not life-changing either. And I'm certainly keeping the steel fork for future use, either training, or touring, or a "monster-cross" rig, or whathaveyou.

    I agree (?) with you that carbon's "dampening" characteristics are oversold. For one, a steel fork has very nice ride characteristics. Also, a carbon fork might (might) give nice dampening characteristics when riding high-pressure low-volume road tires. Switch to high-volume low-pressure cross tires, I can't imagine it being a first- or even second-order effect.

  11. #11
    semifreddo amartuerer 'nother's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northern CA
    My Bikes
    several
    Posts
    4,599
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by flargle View Post
    Just to clarify, I wasn't disagreeing as much as saying you have to look at specifics.
    OK. I just assume that anyone making a purchase will be doing that anyway (or be deserving of the consequences if they don't). That is just common sense. Then again, this is BikeForums

    I agree (?) with you that carbon's "dampening" characteristics are oversold.
    Yep, that's where I was going with that. One hears "material X dampens better than material Y", and it may be true in the lab. But in practice it's difficult to evaluate and compare dampening objectively. Weight, on the other hand, is not

    I guess there is the lingering question of whether weight matters, which is subjective and also dependent on one's racing activities or lack thereof. For me it's not difficult to justify $99 or even a couple of hundred bucks difference for a significant weight savings (whether it's life-changing or not). That sucker seems to get heavier and heavier every lap; anything I can do (in a relatively cheap way) to reduce what I'm shouldering or suitcasing 2-3x per lap definitely makes a difference.
    Can you pass the test?
    Yield to Life.

  12. #12
    ?
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2,740
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    More info. I'm not using this for cross races, there will be zero shouldering involved. Weight is moot really, I fancy carbon but I don't fancy it that much, maybe not $90 more.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,004
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mrbubbles View Post
    More info. I'm not using this for cross races, there will be zero shouldering involved. Weight is moot really, I fancy carbon but I don't fancy it that much, maybe not $90 more.
    Personally, I think both of those Nashbar forks are duds.

    If I were you (I am not), I'd go with any of those Tange-tubed forks at the link I posted. For carbon, I'd save up a little more and get something lighter and nicer.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •