CX forum doesn't seem particularly active
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
CX forum doesn't seem particularly active
So I'll just ask a question to get things moving.
I was looking at a 2008 Specialized Rockhopper and 2008 Specialized TriCross Comp. The tricross is twice the price of the Rockhopper. What's so good about the TriCross? The wheels dont seem to be as strong (less spokes, narrower width), tires aren't as good for trail work, frame is Al (a 2008 Specialized Tarmac Elite is the same price and has a carbon frame, a 2008 Tarmac Comp is also carbon and has better components and is only a touch dearer than TriCross Comp).
What's the point of this thread? I dunno. I guess I've found deals on Rockhopper and Tricross and am wondering why I should spend the extra money on a Tricross. I like Tricross better coz: it's more road oriented, lighter, doesn't have suspension forks, mainly 105 components. But RH is still tougher on the trails.. and will get me more exercise with those fat knobby tires. It's also half the price. So what am I waiting for? Your views.
Besides, this CX forum deserves more threads.
I was looking at a 2008 Specialized Rockhopper and 2008 Specialized TriCross Comp. The tricross is twice the price of the Rockhopper. What's so good about the TriCross? The wheels dont seem to be as strong (less spokes, narrower width), tires aren't as good for trail work, frame is Al (a 2008 Specialized Tarmac Elite is the same price and has a carbon frame, a 2008 Tarmac Comp is also carbon and has better components and is only a touch dearer than TriCross Comp).
What's the point of this thread? I dunno. I guess I've found deals on Rockhopper and Tricross and am wondering why I should spend the extra money on a Tricross. I like Tricross better coz: it's more road oriented, lighter, doesn't have suspension forks, mainly 105 components. But RH is still tougher on the trails.. and will get me more exercise with those fat knobby tires. It's also half the price. So what am I waiting for? Your views.
Besides, this CX forum deserves more threads.
#2
Body By Nintendo
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Videogames ruined my life. Good thing i have 2 extra lives.
Posts: 3,187
Bikes: Giant TCR2, Giant TCX, IRO BFSSFG SE, Salsa Casseroll, IRO Rob Roy.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#3
Eternal NooB
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sonoma County,CA
Posts: 939
Bikes: Calfee Tetra Pro, Lemond BA, Spec Roubaix, Riv Homer Hilson, Cielo
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
well, I'm pretty sure the Rockhopper is a MTN bike right? If it is the lower end Rockhopper, it's going to be heavy and low end components. The Tricross is a cross bike (which are usually a little higher end), and wil be much lighter and may have some higher end components.
While you can certainly race cross with a Mtn bike, you'll have a lot better time on cross bike. For a comparison, I weighed my Kona Fire Mtn (lower end mtn bike) the other day...it was 35#! My Salsa Las Cruces cross bike (nice frame with cheaper components) weighs 22# with the seat bag, that's alot less weight to haul around a cross course for 30-60 minutes! You can use a wrench as a hammer, but why would you when you can get a hammer that does the job better?
While you can certainly race cross with a Mtn bike, you'll have a lot better time on cross bike. For a comparison, I weighed my Kona Fire Mtn (lower end mtn bike) the other day...it was 35#! My Salsa Las Cruces cross bike (nice frame with cheaper components) weighs 22# with the seat bag, that's alot less weight to haul around a cross course for 30-60 minutes! You can use a wrench as a hammer, but why would you when you can get a hammer that does the job better?
__________________
If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the A-Team.
If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the A-Team.
#4
.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 3,981
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix Comp, Soma ES
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah, all those bikes you mentioned are for different purposes. You can use them all for the same purpose, but each will be better at specific things. The Tricross is a decent cyclocross bike and with slight modifications (tires) you can use it as a decent road bike. The Rockhopper is a pure mountain bike. Nothing more, nothing less. It's more suited on single track trails. It wouldn't be an acceptable road bike. The Tarmac is a pure road bike. While you could change the tires and put small cyclocross tires on it, it would make a crappy cyclocross bike.
What's great about the Tricross? It's a pretty decent do-it-all type of bike. If you could only have one of the bikes mentioned above, it'd be the Tricross. If you could have 3, get all 3.
What's great about the Tricross? It's a pretty decent do-it-all type of bike. If you could only have one of the bikes mentioned above, it'd be the Tricross. If you could have 3, get all 3.
__________________
Demented internet tail wagging imbicile.
Demented internet tail wagging imbicile.
#5
Don't smoke, Mike.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,295
Bikes: Devinci Tosca, IRO Rob Roy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
CX forum doesn't seem particularly active?!
YOU don't seem particularly active!
*storms off in a huff*
YOU don't seem particularly active!
*storms off in a huff*
#6
Senior Member
#7
blithering idiot
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: beautiful coastal South Carolina
Posts: 1,263
Bikes: 1991 Trek 930, 2005 Bianchi Eros, 2006 Nashbar "X," IRO Rob Roy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i think everyone's out riding. 'tis the season, you know.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,760
Bikes: Steelman eurocross, Surly CrossCheck, IRO Rob Roy...
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#9
Tiocfáidh ár Lá
I tend to post here only in the season too and mostly in the racing sub forum. We are still a small tight knit group and I like that.
#10
Don't smoke, Mike.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,295
Bikes: Devinci Tosca, IRO Rob Roy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#11
Custom User Title
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 1,913
Bikes: 2006 Marin Stelvio, 1990s Steve Bauer, Marin Palisades Trail
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So I'll just ask a question to get things moving.
I was looking at a 2008 Specialized Rockhopper and 2008 Specialized TriCross Comp. The tricross is twice the price of the Rockhopper. What's so good about the TriCross? The wheels dont seem to be as strong (less spokes, narrower width), tires aren't as good for trail work, frame is Al (a 2008 Specialized Tarmac Elite is the same price and has a carbon frame, a 2008 Tarmac Comp is also carbon and has better components and is only a touch dearer than TriCross Comp).
What's the point of this thread? I dunno. I guess I've found deals on Rockhopper and Tricross and am wondering why I should spend the extra money on a Tricross. I like Tricross better coz: it's more road oriented, lighter, doesn't have suspension forks, mainly 105 components. But RH is still tougher on the trails.. and will get me more exercise with those fat knobby tires. It's also half the price. So what am I waiting for? Your views.
Besides, this CX forum deserves more threads.
I was looking at a 2008 Specialized Rockhopper and 2008 Specialized TriCross Comp. The tricross is twice the price of the Rockhopper. What's so good about the TriCross? The wheels dont seem to be as strong (less spokes, narrower width), tires aren't as good for trail work, frame is Al (a 2008 Specialized Tarmac Elite is the same price and has a carbon frame, a 2008 Tarmac Comp is also carbon and has better components and is only a touch dearer than TriCross Comp).
What's the point of this thread? I dunno. I guess I've found deals on Rockhopper and Tricross and am wondering why I should spend the extra money on a Tricross. I like Tricross better coz: it's more road oriented, lighter, doesn't have suspension forks, mainly 105 components. But RH is still tougher on the trails.. and will get me more exercise with those fat knobby tires. It's also half the price. So what am I waiting for? Your views.
Besides, this CX forum deserves more threads.
#12
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 44
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
HIJACK
Why are the single speeders turning faster lap times than the B's? Thus, why am I racing a geared bike? Those SS guys are freaky fast.
You should buy the tricross (this is a CX thread)
Why are the single speeders turning faster lap times than the B's? Thus, why am I racing a geared bike? Those SS guys are freaky fast.
You should buy the tricross (this is a CX thread)
#14
FREE DEATHHARE
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: princeton, nj
Posts: 302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Very highly dependent on the course.
__________________
transam '07
transam '07
#15
anything but last
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chagrin Falls, Ohio
Posts: 538
Bikes: Cannondale caad9 full duraace`, trek soho singlespeed...cross bike coming soon.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
you should really consider the type(s) of riding you want to do before you set your heart on a bike. also make sure you are not buying a bike based on components, those are the cheaper things to fix/replace. if cross is something you are interested in doing, check it out and test ride a few bikes. moreover go talk to your local shop and have them show you some different things...just have fun.
#16
Senior Member
#17
Uber Goober
A couple of threads in the Texas forum, that you might have missed if you're not from there:
https://www.bikeforums.net/texas/483585-what-cyclocross.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/texas/491909-cyclocross-dallas-morning-news.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/texas/483585-what-cyclocross.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/texas/491909-cyclocross-dallas-morning-news.html
__________________
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
#18
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts