Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 31
  1. #1
    Dirt Bomb sknhgy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,597
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Is a 54cm Kona Jake too big for a 5'8" person?

    I went to the Dave Moulton site, and according to my body size, inseam, foot size, etc., I came up with 54cm as being my correct frame size. I have read where Kona Jakes run large, so I'm wondering if the 54cm is correct. Anyone have experience with these bikes?
    I have a line on a used one.
    more cops have been killed by donuts than guns in chicago it is a medical fact ask any doctor.

  2. #2
    Still kickin - most days BILLYPATT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    Trek 5200 road bike, Trek 7.5 FX hybrid
    Posts
    91
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 5'8" on a good day. My road bike is a 55. The bar is "personal" but no problem. A 54 sounds about right to me but I am unfamilar with the Kona. FWIW.
    Bill Patterson
    www.laastro.com

  3. #3
    Eternal NooB threeflys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    San Diego,CA
    My Bikes
    Rivendell Bleriot 650b, Salsa Las Cruces, Kona Fire Mtn
    Posts
    938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It depends on how long your torso is and and what the top tube length is... I'm 5'8" with a 32" pubic bone height and the 55cm top tube on my Giant TCX was too long (would have been a 54cm seat tube). You really need to size by top tube length (effective, not actual on compact frames) instead of seat tube... BUT, a 54cm seat tube bike is generally considered standard for someone 5'8"...

    BTW- A tip on a used bike...ask if the steerer tube has been cut on the fork. This my make the difference between a really "Aero" position (read uncomfortable for most) or a more relaxed, upright position.
    If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the A-Team.

    Litespeed Xicon with Campy Chorus 11sp/DT Swiss
    Salsa Las Cruces Cross with Chorus 10sp/Ksyrium SL
    Kona Fire Mountain

  4. #4
    Team Beer Cynikal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Sacramento CA
    My Bikes
    Too Many
    Posts
    5,788
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My buddy has 2 Konas that are 54's and he has a 30" inseam.
    I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC

  5. #5
    I Love My Dream
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,029
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    At 5'8" 54 cm is too big for me. I ride nothing larger than 53cm with a maximum toptube of 535mm. I like my bikes short enough to be able to ride in the drops for an indefinate amount of time. I believe people buy or are sold bikes that are too big for them then wonder why they feel pain in their hands, wrists, back etc after extended rides. I'm certified to bike fit and would personally rather fit you to a bike smaller than 54. With modern compact geometry and sloping toptubes inseam measurement is useless. I can stand over a 58cm bike and still have clearance but the bike would obviously be too large for me.

  6. #6
    Senior Member late's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Southern Maine
    Posts
    8,290
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The best way is to test ride one. However, you may want to go a size down.
    The TT is about 55 on that.

    It really helps if you know what top tube length you need. Of course, this varies somewhat from frame to frame.

    Btw, the TT on the 52cm is still 54, again, a test ride is really going to help
    you decide. Failing that, find a bike with that TT length that has similar geometry.
    Your friendly, local, minor god of information.

  7. #7
    Senior Member ronbridal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    524
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As others have pointed out, it all depends on your body measurements. I'm 5'8" and have been considering their 47 or 49. The measurement that is most important for me is the top tube length. My current bike, a 48 cm Redline, has a 52.1 cm top tube. A 54cm Kona has a top tube of 55.2cm which would be way too big for me. The best thing to do would be to test ride it to see if it would really work for you. I would be hesitant if buying from ebay or somewhere similar.

  8. #8
    Junior Dinosaur ecpowertap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    philadelphia
    My Bikes
    Allan Wanta road bike,Cannondale cross bike, bob jackson classic road, bob jackson touring.
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would also add that stem length and bar shape make a big difference. I am 5'8" and have ridden a 54 and it fit very well, and I have a shorter torso. I don't count out a frame on a quick test ride if it feels reasonably close, a degree or two of stem rise and bars with tighter angles and shallow drops can make a huge difference without even changing stem length.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    80
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I owned a 2006 Kona Jake( brown. black and yellow) for a short period of time that I got at a great deal for $450.00. It was sitting in my LBS collecting dust so the owner cut me a deal. I picked it up and I never could get used to the stand over height. It was way to snug for my liking.
    I'm 5'8 about 154lbs with a 29.5 or 30 inseam and I didnt like how it felt I had to leap over the bike. I know you never really plant your feet down while riding but it made me feel like the bike was rather tall riding. I sold it. I prefer smaller bikes for the sake of control and being able to plant your feet around quick corners on the local fire trails and the easy mount/dismount ina cross race. I guess the smaller compact frame allows me to have quicker response. It does tighten up the shouldering points yet riding feels good , But thats just me. Sold the bike, now i go with a 50cm or some times a 52.
    Last edited by steelcx; 01-11-09 at 01:02 AM.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,025
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by steelcx View Post
    I prefer smaller bikes for the sake of control and being able to plant your feet around quick corners on the local fire trails and the easy mount/dismount ina cross race.
    A smaller frame does not make mounting or dismounting a bike any easier, and having a bike with more drop from saddle to bars, and a shorter wheelbase, would tend to make it more difficult to control.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    80
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The 54 was a bit large for me. It seemed like I was riding a horse not a bike for the most part. I'm no bike expert but I would imagine the bottom bracket height paired with the seat tube length made out for the issues I was having. If I positioned my seatpost just right it was like I had to huck myself just to get back on. If I adjusted it a bit lower it I wouldnt get proper leg extension. I just couldnt get my seatpost dialed in. So now I just go with a frame that I can make minor adjustments in stem and seatpost length. I went from Kona to Bianchi so of course each company has there own description as to what they consider each size is. Overall the jake is a great entry lever cross bike. If I were to buy it again id go with a 52.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3,896
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 5'7" and I ride a 55 cm road bike. But I go down one size smaller in a cyclocross frame due to the higher bottom bracket. My 52 cm Bianchi San Jose is sized accordingly. Hope this helps.

  13. #13
    All Bikes All The Time Sawtooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Boise, ID
    My Bikes
    Giant TCR 0, Lemond Zurich, Giant NRS 1, Jamis Explorer Beater/Commuter, Peugeot converted single speed
    Posts
    2,345
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am 5'9 and wear 30inch inseam pants. I ride a 54 road bike AND a 54 Kona Major Jake. The Kona DEFINITELY feels much bigger. It rides more like a 55 or 56 road bike. BUT I LIKE IT THAT WAY. It is especially tall with knobbies (bumps into the boys when I am straddling the top tube). I have had absolutely no problems due to the large feel of the bike and in fact can ride it off road and clean obstacles that have some of my MTB buddies falling off behind me. Other than my first couple of days on the bike, I have NEVER wished it was smaller.
    BUT, there is no question that it feels big for this 5'9" guy.
    Last edited by Sawtooth; 01-13-09 at 03:56 PM.

  14. #14
    Padovano Mike552's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    696
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NormanF View Post
    I'm 5'7" and I ride a 55 cm road bike. But I go down one size smaller in a cyclocross frame due to the higher bottom bracket. My 52 cm Bianchi San Jose is sized accordingly. Hope this helps.
    The last 2 comments are the most useful, I think.
    I will just add to them by saying that I ride 55cm road frames and 53cm touring/cross frames.

    The discrepancy in sizes is due to the cross frame being slightly more elevated from the ground by the positioning of the wheels (allowing for wider tire clearance vs a road bike).
    *1987 Panasonic DX-5000/STI-9 *1983 Univega Gran Premio/STI-9 *1991 Bridgestone MB-2/Suntour XC Pro

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3,896
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yep. For comparison, I have a 54 cm Trek 520. The reason the smaller frame feels comparable is the fatter tires raise the bike to nearly the same height as the road bike so the going a size smaller is canceled out by the wider tires mounted on cyclocross/touring bikes.

  16. #16
    10 Speed
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    400
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Wait a second

    There's a lot of hooey floating around here. When sizing a CX'er, the general thought is to go down one size from your road bike assuming the HT and ST angles are the same. If not, or if you are not coming into CX from the road, then, like any other bike, you want to pay attention to the length of the ST, HT and TT. The height of the BB (which is usually always higher than a road bike) has very little to do with correct fit other that it changes the HT and ST angles. The reason folks size down from road bikes has nothing to do with size of tires, BB height or standover height, but rather sizing down makes for a smaller cockpit and redistributes your weight/balance over the center of the bike to theoretically improve handling over rough stuff and off-camber parts of the course.

    To get to your answer, a 54 Kona will have a 55.1 or 55.3 TT depending on the model year. It will also have a HT of 13 or 13.5mm and, of course, a 54cm ST. At least mine does. I'm 5'10" and ride a 55 road bike. I also have a 54 Kona Jake. I run a shortish stem and zero offset post to make my cockpit smaller, but the frame fits me perfectly. I hope this helps.

  17. #17
    Senior Member ronbridal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    524
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MerckxMad View Post
    There's a lot of hooey floating around here. When sizing a CX'er, the general thought is to go down one size from your road bike assuming the HT and ST angles are the same. If not, or if you are not coming into CX from the road, then, like any other bike, you want to pay attention to the length of the ST, HT and TT. The height of the BB (which is usually always higher than a road bike) has very little to do with correct fit other that it changes the HT and ST angles. The reason folks size down from road bikes has nothing to do with size of tires, BB height or standover height, but rather sizing down makes for a smaller cockpit and redistributes your weight/balance over the center of the bike to theoretically improve handling over rough stuff and off-camber parts of the course.

    To get to your answer, a 54 Kona will have a 55.1 or 55.3 TT depending on the model year. It will also have a HT of 13 or 13.5mm and, of course, a 54cm ST. At least mine does. I'm 5'10" and ride a 55 road bike. I also have a 54 Kona Jake. I run a shortish stem and zero offset post to make my cockpit smaller, but the frame fits me perfectly. I hope this helps.
    I also see some hooey floating! You shouldn't switch your seatpost to adjust your cockpit. The reason you should use a zero offset seatpost would be to put your body in the correct position while pedaling. As in, knee over pedal (or close based on personal preference). If you have to run both a short stem and a zero offset seatpost to make the cockpit right for you then your top tube is too long for your reach. Simply put, your bike is too big.

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,025
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd like to add, it's a common fallacy that moving to a smaller frame necessarily shortens the cockpit. The problem is that while the frame gets smaller, saddle height stays constant, so you need to use more seatpost. This moves the butt up and away from the handlebars. (Another way of looking at it, is that the headtube shortens, moving the bars away from the saddle.)

  19. #19
    10 Speed
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    400
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ronbridal View Post
    I also see some hooey floating! You shouldn't switch your seatpost to adjust your cockpit. The reason you should use a zero offset seatpost would be to put your body in the correct position while pedaling. As in, knee over pedal (or close based on personal preference). If you have to run both a short stem and a zero offset seatpost to make the cockpit right for you then your top tube is too long for your reach. Simply put, your bike is too big.
    Wrong. I have short torso as compared to my femur length. My TT and ST lengths are appropriate for my body dimensions. I run 9cm stem instead of the Kona specc'd 10.5cm stem to accomodate my shortened reach. I choose to run a zero offset post because I am not so much concerned with the mythical KOPS position on my CX bike and am more comfortable with my saddle closer to the BB centerline. If I were to size down as you mistakenly suggest, the HT on my Kona would shorten increasing the saddle to bar drop. If you reread my original post, what I was addressing is the suggestions to the OP to size down because of standover height, BB height, or tire size.

  20. #20
    Wheelsuck Fat Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,159
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    First, what do you want to use the bike for?

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3,896
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Most of us use a CX frame like the Kona Jake for fun riding. We're not about to enter a cyclocross competition. LOL

  22. #22
    Wheelsuck Fat Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,159
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Which is why I ask. If he's racing, the answer is going to vary a bit from him wanting a good commuter or cruiser. Not that the actual fit would be different, but the overall importance of the fit is a more critical in a racing environment than it would be for a casual rider.

  23. #23
    Team Water Andy_K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Jake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 1999 Kona Muni Mula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker
    Posts
    7,020
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NormanF View Post
    Most of us use a CX frame like the Kona Jake for fun riding. We're not about to enter a cyclocross competition. LOL


    That's the position I was in when I bought mine, but then I entered "a cyclocross competition" and my whole view of things changed. Everyone who owns a CX bike should be required by law to try cross racing at least once, for their own good. Not doing so is like owning a pizza and using it exclusively as a frisbee.

  24. #24
    Padovano Mike552's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    696
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MerckxMad View Post
    The reason folks size down from road bikes has nothing to do with size of tires, BB height or standover height, but rather sizing down makes for a smaller cockpit and redistributes your weight/balance over the center of the bike to theoretically improve handling over rough stuff and off-camber parts of the course.

    While I do not disagree with your view of the advantage of a smaller cockpit, you are also spewing "hooey", or whatever the hell you called it, when you say that sizing down has nothing to do with size of tires or standover height due to predetermined wheel clearances. This relationship in frame sizes is so obvious that all one has to do is put a road bike next to a CX bike with similar angles and dimensions to see what I am talking about. If you disagree, well, hell...
    *1987 Panasonic DX-5000/STI-9 *1983 Univega Gran Premio/STI-9 *1991 Bridgestone MB-2/Suntour XC Pro

  25. #25
    Senior Member c_m_shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Paradise, TX
    My Bikes
    Surly Cross Check, Redline Monocog 29er, Generic Track bike, Surly Pugsley, Salsa Fargo, Schwinn Klunker
    Posts
    1,524
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sknhgy View Post
    I went to the Dave Moulton site, and according to my body size, inseam, foot size, etc., I came up with 54cm as being my correct frame size. I have read where Kona Jakes run large, so I'm wondering if the 54cm is correct. Anyone have experience with these bikes?
    I have a line on a used one.

    54 should be about right. I am your height and have been comfortable on bikes from 52-55 cm. It will take some time to get the fit dialed in to your preferences no matter what advise anyone gives you on frame sizes.
    May your trails be crooked, winding, lonesome, dangerous, leading to the most amazing view.
    May your mountains rise into and above the clouds. -Edward Abbey

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •