Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Officially Foul Mouthed
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Raleigh
    My Bikes
    Ti IF PlanetX, etc.
    Posts
    228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    mountain or trekking chainrings for CX

    i'm building a cx bike that i want to race this fall; i'll be a c4; cx is a secondary thing for me so i'm on a tight budget

    problem is with the frame i picked up; the chainstays are wide so the shimano hollowtech 175 mm arms practically touch on the non-drive side; choice of 3-piece cranksets is diminishing but i found a cheap mountain 44/32/22, a trekking 48/38/28, and a cheap 50/34 all using octalink which should allow me to get more crankarm to chainstay clearance with proper selection of BB length

    reference point: i can spin out a 48/16 to 32 mph on a downhill - is that much speed necessary in cx? cx i watched last fall didn't appear to be going that fast

    i've got a 26/12 cassette

    i'm leaning to the mountain 44/32/22 and removing the 22, but i'd appreciate hearing more input; i've seen some similar questions in other threads but none with the 3-piece crank limitation

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,011
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You'll be so pinned during your races that if there happens to be some smooth downhill section where you can spin out a 44/12, just enjoy the chance to catch your breath.

  3. #3
    I ride my bike Revtor's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    418
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you will not need 32 mph in a cx race!

    (I think my 28 38 48 + MTN cassette is the perfect all around, everyday riding setup btw)
    ~Steve

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    San Jose, Ca
    My Bikes
    09 Specialized Tricross Sport
    Posts
    1,213
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mikerhymeswith View Post
    the chainstays are wide so the shimano hollowtech 175 mm arms practically touch on the non-drive side
    I'm just curious as to if this is a double or a triple as the triple actually requires a 4mm spacer on the non-drive side.

    If you've got a double, you could leave your hollowtech II bb cups in place and just add the triple and its spacers to get that extra 4mm on the NDS. Leave the small ring or remove it, your call. I guess you would need a triple front derailleur just because they are set up for the 45mm chainlines that triples run and I don't know if the double front derailleurs, which are intened for 43.5mm chainlines, would work.

    I would just suggest to add the 4mm spacer on the NDS of a Hollowtech II double but I don't know if that would give the NDS a different q-factor than the DS.

    So, OK, which crankset do you have on there now?
    FOR SALE:
    NEW Ritchey Pro 27.2 x 350 x 25mm-offset seatpost
    NEW Dura Ace 7703 9-speed triple 28.6 front derailleur
    USED Ritchey Pro 30deg 110 x 31.8 stem
    USED Specialized Comp 20-28deg 110 x 31.8 adjustable stem

  5. #5
    M_S
    M_S is offline
    All Mod Cons M_S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Face down in a snowbank
    My Bikes
    K2 Enemey Cyclocross franken build; Redline D660 29er, Volpe SS Cross
    Posts
    3,694
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I had a 42 x 12 top gear last season and never spun out. None of our courses had long descents though. The only descents were short and rough enough that you were coasting anyways.

  6. #6
    Made in Norway Lectron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,632
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    used 42 x 11 several seasons.......no problems.
    that's about 50kmh (30 mph) @ 90-95 rpm
    Quote Originally Posted by The Dude
    Weight weenieness is a disease very often caused by the lack of good results. Just a few steps below doping in terms of desperation

  7. #7
    Officially Foul Mouthed
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Raleigh
    My Bikes
    Ti IF PlanetX, etc.
    Posts
    228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    well....the mtb crankset option is out because the chainline is 50mm and 45mm is more appropriate; last night i built up the bike to test ride capability (using 105 hollowtech, 175mm, 50/34) and even though there is only a flat screwdriver blade sliver of clearance between the left crankarm and chainstay there was no touching when i pedaled hard; i did not do a 50/12 uphill sprint effort to torque the frame hard however, so testing at the limits was not performed

    then i got the idea that i could grind and/or file away some material from the inside tip of the left crankarm to increase the clearance by a few mm; i don't think this will compromise the integrity of the crank and i accept that this will null any warranty on it;

    another idea was to deform the left chainstay a bit but i decided to not try this just yet

    i thought about using a 170mm crankset, but that would lift my costs and i really want 175s

    the alternative is to scrap the frame - which only cost me usd110 - no big loss, but this bike is supposed to be cheap and serviceable for a CX4 rider, so scrapping is not good

    if left arm tip grinding idea works then i'll replace the 50/34 rings with 46/36 (hmmm, maybe 46/34 or 44/34) ) and be ready for CX season

    i'll take some before/after pics - unless someone scares me off of this latest idea
    Last edited by mikerhymeswith; 03-26-09 at 08:33 AM.

  8. #8
    Officially Foul Mouthed
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Raleigh
    My Bikes
    Ti IF PlanetX, etc.
    Posts
    228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by thirdin77 View Post
    I would just suggest to add the 4mm spacer on the NDS of a Hollowtech II double but I don't know if that would give the NDS a different q-factor than the DS.

    So, OK, which crankset do you have on there now?
    105 Hollowtech 50/34 175mm on now

    i looked at possibility of spacers but it looked to me like I'd be using too many and have too little spline interface between the spindle and crankarm

    SRAM told me all their road cranksets have a 120mm Q factor and mtb have 140mm; my 105 crankset has 120mm also.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •