Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Throw the stick!!!! LowCel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    My Bikes
    GMC Denali
    Posts
    17,591
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Conquest or Cross Check for first cx bike

    Well I was planning on buying a Redline Conquest but now I'm not so sure about getting the all aluminum frame/fork. I can get a Surly Cross Check for about $40 more so I am looking at it as well. The thing that I don't like about the Surly is the bar end shifters. I can always change the shifters though so I can get by that part.

    I am planning on using this bike primarily for fire roads to help me get into shape for mountain bike racing. I am also planning on putting my road bike wheelset on it and using it as a road bike some until my new road bike frame arrives (another 6-8 weeks ) I'm also planning on trying a couple of cyclocross races later this year.

    Anyway, if you had to decide between these two bikes which would you buy?

  2. #2
    Weebles wobble...
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    South Florida
    My Bikes
    04 Surly Cross-check, circa 1969 Columbia Commuter III
    Posts
    91
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I bought my Cross-Check about a month ago. I wanted a steel frame. My first three choices, the Bianchi Volpe, LeMond Poprad & Jamis Nova were not available from the manufacturers due to a shortage of Shimano components.

    My LBS located a Surly in my size. After changing the stem, saddle & seat post the bike fits great. I'm happy with it so far.

  3. #3
    Senior Member MrEWorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Aurora, IL
    Posts
    265
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The cross check complete may have the bar ends. If you buy the frame, you can have it built any way you want.

  4. #4
    human velocipedio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    living in the moment
    My Bikes
    2005 Litespeed Teramo, 2000 Marinoni Leggero, 2001 Kona Major Jake (with Campy Centaur), 1997 Specialized S-Works M2, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper
    Posts
    3,563
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    if you plan to race, i'd suggest going with a the redline. it's not the best race rig out there, but it's a bit lighter than a built-up surly and the surly's i've tried are a bit slow on the tight turns [though they carve sweeping turns quite nicely]. my main complain about the surly [as a race bike] is that the bb is a bit noodly.
    when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.

    The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
    Cycling irregularly since 2002

  5. #5
    Throw the stick!!!! LowCel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    My Bikes
    GMC Denali
    Posts
    17,591
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the opinions everyone. I decided that I'm really not all that crazy about the way the surly is spec'ed when buying it as a complete bike. I'm just not a fan of the bar end shifters plus the wheelset really isn't all that impressive. I figure to just keep everything simple the redline will probably be better for me right now. If I end up enjoying cyclocross then I will have no problem justifying buying a better bike later on this year. Right now it's just a little tough on me since I just ordered a titanium independent fabrication crown jewel frameset. I still need to buy my dura ace 10 components for it so money is just a little tight right now.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •