Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Senior Member Sincitycycler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    "Gosh honey, you pass more like Tony Rominger..."
    My Bikes
    2005 Scott CR1 Pro - 1992 Panasonix Fixed Conversion 60tx20t
    Posts
    3,219
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Any advantage of using a 700x32c tire over a 700x28C?

    Been commuting on my fixie, but my normal route has been torn up somewhat due to construction, and I even have to run on the sidewalk on some sections w/ those annoying relieve cracks every 4 feet...

    Currently running 700x23 tires at 116psi, but the rough sections knock my fillings out

    I like get a smoother ride-been thinking of 28s or 32s at <100psi. Suggestions?
    "How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"

  2. #2
    Have bike, will travel Barrettscv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Windy City
    My Bikes
    A road bike for every purpose
    Posts
    9,367
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sincitycycler View Post
    Been commuting on my fixie, but my normal route has been torn up somewhat due to construction, and I even have to run on the sidewalk on some sections w/ those annoying relieve cracks every 4 feet...

    Currently running 700x23 tires at 116psi, but the rough sections knock my fillings out

    I like get a smoother ride-been thinking of 28s or 32s at <100psi. Suggestions?
    I've used both. I would say 28's can do almost any firm surface, including gravel.

    32's can run at lower pressures and are more stable over potholes, gaping cracks and soft surfaces.

    I use 28's and run them at 100 psi, the ride is acceptable. 32's are not going to feel as fast, if that matters.

    Michael
    2014 Trek DS.1: "Viaggiatore" A do-it-all bike that is waiting in Italy
    2012 Pedal Force CG2: "Secolo Bicicletta" the modern carbon fiber road bike
    2012 Pedal Force CX2: "Carbone CX" the carbon fiber CX bike
    2010 Origin 8 CX 700: "Servizio Grave" Monstercross/29er bike
    1997 Simoncini Special Cyclocross: "Little Simon" lugged Columbus steel CX bike
    1987 Serotta Nova Special X: "Azzurri" The retro Columbus SPX steel road bike
    1971ish Peugeot PX10: "Fancy Lugs"

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Illinois
    My Bikes
    K2 3.0 ZED
    Posts
    108
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Either size should be a considerable increase in comfort from a 700x23 which I no longer ride. My current tires are 32 cross tires which are dying. I may go for a set of 30's with the round/smooth profile rather than the 32's with cross treads. Keep in mind manufacturers aren't always on the same scale when it comes to measurement; I've seen 32's close to 30's and 28's also close to 30's in actual size.

  4. #4
    Senior Member jdon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,204
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Agreed, although you will notice the increase in rolling resistance. The ride is a lot smoother.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    San Jose, Ca
    My Bikes
    09 Specialized Tricross Sport
    Posts
    1,213
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It depends on if the 700x28 is a city or trekking tire or if it is a road racing tire. The former would be exemplified by something like a vittoria randonneur and the latter would be more like a conti gatorskin or grand prix 4 season.

    Basically, the lower of a pressure range is has, the more comfortable it can be, albeit at the expense of more rolling resistance.

    The 700x32's I've tried have had noticeably more resistance though I hear the Panaracer Urban Max 70032 @ 100psi rolls pretty fast.
    FOR SALE:
    NEW Ritchey Pro 27.2 x 350 x 25mm-offset seatpost
    NEW Dura Ace 7703 9-speed triple 28.6 front derailleur
    USED Ritchey Pro 30deg 110 x 31.8 stem
    USED Specialized Comp 20-28deg 110 x 31.8 adjustable stem

  6. #6
    Senior Member late's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Southern Maine
    Posts
    8,290
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I went from a 27c to a 32c this year. The change was not dramatic, but it was welcome. The roads this year are hideous, construction everywhere, potholes, you name it.

    I am contemplating something even larger.
    Old Man Maine

  7. #7
    Senior Member meanwhile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,033
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jdon View Post
    Agreed, although you will notice the increase in rolling resistance [with increased tyre width]
    No. This is one of those everyone-knows things that isn't true. RR depends a lot on tyre compound type and tyre wall thickness, and for a given tyre it descreases with pressure, but wider tyres actually have LOWER RR. Take a look at http://www.terrymorse.com/bike/rolres.html and see the sports touring 28mm kick the ass of the race optimized tyres narrower tyres.

    24mm tyres are still faster in real road race conditions, because they take place at speeds where air resistance dominates, and a narrower tyre provides reduced frontal surface area.

    So if you seek out a premium compound wider slick then increased RR shouldn't be a problem. I'd see if there is a 32-38mm Rubino, or go for a Sports Contact. Exact tyre width should depend on surface and on ***rider weight.*** Rivendell has a good chart for this.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Sincitycycler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    "Gosh honey, you pass more like Tony Rominger..."
    My Bikes
    2005 Scott CR1 Pro - 1992 Panasonix Fixed Conversion 60tx20t
    Posts
    3,219
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So based on the above tests, the Hutchinson Top Speed is the fastest clincher tested?
    Last edited by Sincitycycler; 07-02-09 at 08:43 PM.
    "How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"

  9. #9
    Senior Member IAMTB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    349
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sincitycycler View Post
    So based on the above tests, the Hutchinson Top Speed is the fastest clincher tested?
    Yes when not taking into account wind resistance.
    Pulling the trigger as often as possible.

  10. #10
    alk
    alk is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sincitycycler View Post
    So based on the above tests, the Hutchinson Top Speed is the fastest clincher tested?
    Quote Originally Posted by IAMTB View Post
    Yes when not taking into account wind resistance.
    actually looking at the figure it seems to me that the hutchinson would be the slowest.

  11. #11
    Senior Member meanwhile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,033
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sincitycycler View Post
    So based on the above tests, the Hutchinson Top Speed is the fastest clincher tested?
    My bad - I'm looking at this on a Netbook, and I forgot there where several graphs below the one I referred to - which was the "classic" Jobst Brandt graph - http://www.terrymorse.com/bike/imgs/rolres.gif; the fast 28mm there is the Avocet. And performance of tyres of the same width varied a LOT.

    Basic lesson: it's the tyre compound that matters most, not the width. Fast compound (with low hysteresis energy) used only to come in a narrow tyres for racers, but you can now get it in wider rubber - eg 1.5 x 26 Rubinos. Otoh performance of "premium" narrow racing tyres varies widely.

    ..And if you ride too narrow a tyre on a soft or loose surface then the physics gets more complicated and you lose energy in other ways. Ditto for too high a pressure I *think* - the back wheel's tyre needs enough flex to conform to the surface to transfer power ...

    Oh - and latex tubes will make you go faster! Good article on RR on the road:

    http://www.rouesartisanales.over-blo...e-1503651.html



    ..And the physics of real offroad tyres for MTBs are so complex I don't even want to think about it!

  12. #12
    Eternal NooB threeflys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    San Diego,CA
    My Bikes
    Rivendell Bleriot 650b, Salsa Las Cruces, Kona Fire Mtn
    Posts
    938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sincitycycler View Post
    I like get a smoother ride-been thinking of 28s or 32s at <100psi. Suggestions?
    Riding 28s or 32s at anything close to 100psi is counter productive... The while point of getting a bigger tire is so you can run much lower pressure... I have a Rivendell that I run 33s on with around 60psi, my cross bike runs around 45-50psi when on trails and I haven't had any problems...

    If you go with the bigger tire, I recommend nothing higher than around 80 at the max...

    Grant Peterson of Rivendell has pretty strange ideas sometimes, but he is right on with a lot of stuff also... Check out this article http://www.rivbike.com/article/components/tires

    Chris
    If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the A-Team.

    Litespeed Xicon with Campy Chorus 11sp/DT Swiss
    Salsa Las Cruces Cross with Chorus 10sp/Ksyrium SL
    Kona Fire Mountain

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •