Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    64
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    New cross fork needed - Rake question

    I need a new fork for my tricross s-works (1 1/8" Mindset headset). Looking for all carbon, which leads me to:

    Alpha Q CX20 - http://www.truetemper.com/Performance_Tubing/cx20.asp 47mm rake
    Easton EC90 X - http://www.eastonbike.com/PRODUCTS/F...0_X_%2709.html 45mm rake
    Ritchey WCS Carbon Cross Fork (NOT the V2) - http://www.ritcheylogic.com/dyn_prodfamily.php?k=114366 48mm rake

    My current fork is 47mm rake, will going down to 45mm make that big of a difference (as far as making it 'twitchy')? I assume going up to a 48mm won't really change much. I just want to make sure I'm not completely changing the handling of the bike (yes I know a new fork will change it regardless), but specifically on the rake, will 2mm be completely different, or minor (if even noticeable at all)


    I'm not looking to blow $550 on a fork, but the Ritchey can be had for about $325, but I haven't heard anything about that fork (if you have, please let me know +/-). Easton and Alpha Q's will most likely be ~$450 if you find a good deal online.

    1) Rake gonna make that big of a difference (if it would be huge, the 45mm EC90 would be out as it's the biggest change)

    2) Ritchey fork is gonna be about $100 cheaper, is it worth +$100 to get the Alpha Q or Easton? Weights are compatible, just not sure about the quality. all are full carbon.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Shimagnolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Zang's Spur, CO
    Posts
    6,256
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by glacious View Post

    My current fork is 47mm rake, will going down to 45mm make that big of a difference (as far as making it 'twitchy')? I assume going up to a 48mm won't really change much.
    Less rake -> more trail -> more stable.
    More rake -> less trail -> less stable.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    ABQ, NM
    My Bikes
    Neuvation F100, Surly Cross Check, Van Dessel Holeshot
    Posts
    1,152
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you also want to look at the fork length as that will change your head angle, which will in turn affect the trail.

    Ritchey's are nice forks; they used to come stock on Redlines

  4. #4
    Senior Member hocker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Denver
    My Bikes
    Road and Mountain
    Posts
    619
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For what it's worth, I built up a new machine this summer and asked a lot of questions about frames/forks/etc and everything I heard from LBS's in Boulder/Denver is Ritchey's and Alpha's are much better than Easton's. It was a reoccurring theme when a conversation of forks came up. Pro Peloton in Boulder (experts) recommended the Ritchey.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    64
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for all the great feedback, I'm going to go with the Ritchey WCS Carbon Cross. Price / weight ratio and recommendations on here (as well as a few local groups) seem to lean that way. The lengths are very close and 47 to 48mm rake won't change the handling much from what I'm used to (and like).

    Thanks again!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •