Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Mud Tires

  1. #1
    Mitcholo CrimsonKarter21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
    My Bikes
    2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red
    Posts
    8,851
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Mud Tires

    I've noticed that a lot of mud tires are narrower than the tried-and-true 35mm. My Michelin Mud2's are 30mm, and my team boss just gave me a wheelset with some 27mm () Clement mud tires glued on.

    Am I correct in that you want a narrow tire to "cut" throught the mud?

  2. #2
    astrositupataphysicyclist UBUvelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Media PA
    My Bikes
    too many now
    Posts
    596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CrimsonKarter21 View Post
    ...

    Am I correct in that you want a narrow tire to "cut" throught the mud?

    that actually sounds right....my experience with mud and a thin tire is new, but i've noticed it does slice thru the really thick muck, esp. if you are hauling. and that's with a week of doing it with slicks while waiting for my new knobbies to come in
    .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 after the big bang

    2008 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--small (goatcross)
    2010 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--medium
    2004 Bianchi Axis 1x9 (cyclocross)
    1993 Giant Avonni (mutantcross)
    2009 Giant Defy 2 (cobblecross)
    1990 Schwinn Caliente (medicinecross)
    2009 Giant Yukon FX (root/rock/mudcrosscountry)--recent addition: RockShox Revelation U-Turn

  3. #3
    Oh The Huge Manatee Lithuania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    mabra
    Posts
    4,528
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    thats correct

    although mich mud2s are closer to 35 than 30

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Athens, Ohio
    My Bikes
    Custom Custom Custom
    Posts
    5,104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Depends on the type of mud. If its thick, then you want a narrow tire to "cut" through it. If its more soupy, than a wider tire will be better.

    I think you are better off with 32's since i personally think 30's have very little practical use except in super thick mud.

  5. #5
    Tiocfáidh ár Lá jfmckenna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    The edge of b#
    My Bikes
    A whole bunch-a bikes.
    Posts
    5,414
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I think 32 is the end all be all tire size. Well it's most versatile anyway. It's nice to have the luxury of multiple wheelsets and different tread patters and tire sizes but if you just have one then 32's are it IMHO. But yeah thin mud tires on deep dish wheels are great for cutting through the mud to the hard pack under neath and there is less drag through mud so it's ideal in those conditions.

  6. #6
    astrositupataphysicyclist UBUvelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Media PA
    My Bikes
    too many now
    Posts
    596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    a quick question that is related (thus no irritating 'new thread'):

    do i put my rear tire with the tread going in the opposite direction (as i did with my MTB michelin mud 2.0s)?

    or should both treads be aimed forward...?
    .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 after the big bang

    2008 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--small (goatcross)
    2010 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--medium
    2004 Bianchi Axis 1x9 (cyclocross)
    1993 Giant Avonni (mutantcross)
    2009 Giant Defy 2 (cobblecross)
    1990 Schwinn Caliente (medicinecross)
    2009 Giant Yukon FX (root/rock/mudcrosscountry)--recent addition: RockShox Revelation U-Turn

  7. #7
    Flying Under the Radar X-LinkedRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Northeast PA
    My Bikes
    10' SuperiorLite SL Club | 06' Giant FCR3 | 2010 GT Avalanche 3.0 Disc
    Posts
    4,117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well, there is a reason some bikes will come with 2 different tires. A front cutting tire usually with pointed in tread or almost cleated tire. And the rear power/drive tire which will usually have a step or straight horizontal tread for almost paddling through mud/dirt/sand
    12' SuperiorLite SL Pro w/ Sram Rival | 10' SuperiorLite SL Club w/ Sram Force | 06' Giant FCR (Dropbar) w/ Shimano 5700 | 10' GT Avalanche 3.0 Disc

  8. #8
    Tiocfáidh ár Lá jfmckenna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    The edge of b#
    My Bikes
    A whole bunch-a bikes.
    Posts
    5,414
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by UBUvelo View Post
    a quick question that is related (thus no irritating 'new thread'):

    do i put my rear tire with the tread going in the opposite direction (as i did with my MTB michelin mud 2.0s)?

    or should both treads be aimed forward...?
    I think that is a bit of voodoo. I never really believed that but lots of people do it. I put mine on in the same direction. Though one year I reversed them only because like a dumbass I glued the tire on backwards but hey, at least I had an excuse

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    257
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My Vittoria Cross XGs have two arrows on the sidewall.

    One direction says "speed-->" and the other says "<-- traction"

    The "speed" direction has the arrows pointer forward. The "traction" direction has the arrows backwards, presumably to act as "paddles" in soft terrain. So, I have the front mounted for speed, and the rear for traction.

    Does it actually make a difference? Heck if I know.

  10. #10
    Team Water Andy_K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Jake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 1999 Kona Muni Mula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker
    Posts
    7,020
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Lithuania View Post
    although mich mud2s are closer to 35 than 30
    I think I've heard that before, but I picked up a pair last night and now I'm puzzled. I measured them at about 31mm, maybe a little under, at around 40 psi. Are they that much wider at higher pressure or is there a lot of manufacturing variation?

  11. #11
    Senior Member duckbill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Waterloo, Ontario
    My Bikes
    Marinoni X4
    Posts
    423
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Crack Monkey View Post
    My Vittoria Cross XGs have two arrows on the sidewall.

    Does it actually make a difference? Heck if I know.
    If it is anything like motorcycle tires, front tire needs most of the braking traction and the rear wheel for forward traction which are opposite from one another. That may explain the opposite directional arrows.

  12. #12
    Señor Member myclem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    My Bikes
    Motobecane Immortal, Van Dessel Gin & Trombones, Rawland Stag, Bianchi SASS
    Posts
    196
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by duckbill View Post
    If it is anything like motorcycle tires, front tire needs most of the braking traction and the rear wheel for forward traction which are opposite from one another. That may explain the opposite directional arrows.
    So which way for the arrows?
    (Looking at the bike from the top with rear to left)
    1) Rear <- frame -> Front
    2) Rear -> frame <- Front
    Last edited by myclem; 10-30-09 at 04:34 PM.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    257
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Straddling the bike, like you're about to go for a ride... the front tire has the tread arrows like /\, so as they roll, the point hits the ground first. And the rear has them like \/ so they "scoop" at the dirt.

    So, I think your #1.

  14. #14
    Señor Member myclem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    My Bikes
    Motobecane Immortal, Van Dessel Gin & Trombones, Rawland Stag, Bianchi SASS
    Posts
    196
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Got it. I currently have them both pointing forward. I will try #1.

  15. #15
    Oh The Huge Manatee Lithuania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    mabra
    Posts
    4,528
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy_K View Post
    I think I've heard that before, but I picked up a pair last night and now I'm puzzled. I measured them at about 31mm, maybe a little under, at around 40 psi. Are they that much wider at higher pressure or is there a lot of manufacturing variation?
    ive never actually measured them myself so i dont know. im just a sheep that listens to what others tell me

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    211
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Crack Monkey View Post
    Straddling the bike, like you're about to go for a ride... the front tire has the tread arrows like /\, so as they roll, the point hits the ground first. And the rear has them like \/ so they "scoop" at the dirt.

    So, I think your #1.
    I would think it'd be the other way around, as you would want your front tire providing as much traction as possible, and not have your rear wheel feel bogged down during quick accelerations.

  17. #17
    Señor Member myclem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    My Bikes
    Motobecane Immortal, Van Dessel Gin & Trombones, Rawland Stag, Bianchi SASS
    Posts
    196
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by erichkopp View Post
    I would think it'd be the other way around, as you would want your front tire providing as much traction as possible, and not have your rear wheel feel bogged down during quick accelerations.
    This makes sense, too.
    If the rear slips, I have a chance at recovering.
    If the front slips, I have a chance to eat mud pie.

    Does it depend on conditions? dry vs wet?

  18. #18
    astrositupataphysicyclist UBUvelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Media PA
    My Bikes
    too many now
    Posts
    596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    well, i'm from mississippi and lived too close to new orleans, so i'll stick with the voodoo tread reversal mojo like my mountain bike is...i don't see the oppositional rear hurting acceleration....but i like that it can claw and bite (albeit itty bitty knobbies)...heck, like a mole.

    if i finish last or not at all, i'll reverse the spell!

    Quote Originally Posted by jfmckenna View Post
    I think that is a bit of voodoo. I never really believed that but lots of people do it. I put mine on in the same direction. Though one year I reversed them only because like a dumbass I glued the tire on backwards but hey, at least I had an excuse
    .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 after the big bang

    2008 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--small (goatcross)
    2010 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--medium
    2004 Bianchi Axis 1x9 (cyclocross)
    1993 Giant Avonni (mutantcross)
    2009 Giant Defy 2 (cobblecross)
    1990 Schwinn Caliente (medicinecross)
    2009 Giant Yukon FX (root/rock/mudcrosscountry)--recent addition: RockShox Revelation U-Turn

  19. #19
    Team Water Andy_K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Jake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 1999 Kona Muni Mula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker
    Posts
    7,020
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by erichkopp View Post
    I would think it'd be the other way around, as you would want your front tire providing as much traction as possible, and not have your rear wheel feel bogged down during quick accelerations.
    Yes to the concept, but no to the execution, you want the front tire to roll when it's rotating (front of the V) and grab when it's not (back of the V), and you want the back tire to push when its rotating (back of the V). It would be nice for the back tire to also grab when it's not turning, but it's not as important as the other stuff.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •