Search
Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Gunnar Crosshairs sizing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-09, 07:00 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 105
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Gunnar Crosshairs sizing

Thinking about buying friend's Crosshairs but I'm afraid it will be too small for me. The frame size is a 52 cm with a sloping toptube. He has it set up with road tires 700x23c. I am 5'10" with about a 30.5-31" inseam. The reach for me is very comfortable and the bike itself feels great and the smaller frame seems really nimble. Of course I have ample standover clearance. With the sloping top tube, I have the seatpost out as far as possible (>5" of seatpost showing). Is this normal for sloping toptubes to have this much seatpost showing?
Would I be able to make the 52 work? Looking at Gunnar's website, I think the 54 would be spot on, but...
How much of a difference would it make if I were to put cross or touring tires on?
Appreciate any feedback.
ptn206 is offline  
Old 10-31-09, 07:06 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 105
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Here's the geometry of Gunnar Crosshairs
https://www.gunnarbikes.com/crosshairsspecs.php
ptn206 is offline  
Old 10-31-09, 12:39 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 576

Bikes: Serial bike flipper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times in 73 Posts
I would say that would be quite a bit too small. Then again, I'm a bit gun shy about this: I rode a 60cm Crosshairs for 10 years. I loved the way it rode, but I could never get quite comfortable on it. My 62cm Crosscheck fits much better. I'm 6'3", so not a direct comparison though.
seat_boy is offline  
Old 10-31-09, 01:00 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
nelzar13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Coventry RI
Posts: 293

Bikes: 1958 raleigh fixed , specialized P2, standard S250, giant cross country bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Head to a decent bike shop and get fitted for a bike on one of those adjustable bike fitting things they have and see what they say if your not to confident in buying a bike that may or may not fit you. In my opinion 5 inches isnt a ton of seat post on a bike with a sloping tt. My experience says if it feels comfortable ride it. But never just settle for a bike that may be a size to big or small because its a great deal... !
nelzar13 is offline  
Old 10-31-09, 01:21 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
52cm is too small for a guy who's 5'10".
flargle is offline  
Old 10-31-09, 01:40 PM
  #6  
Have bike, will travel
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 158 Posts
Originally Posted by flargle
52cm is too small for a guy who's 5'10".
Ditto;

I'm 5' 11.5" and ride a size 60 Soma Double Cross. I could also use a size 58.

My 21 year old daughter rides a 51cm Jamis Nova Pro. She is 5' 5".

Michael
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
Barrettscv is offline  
Old 10-31-09, 05:35 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Alameda, California
Posts: 71

Bikes: 2008 Cannondale Six-13 3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A smaller frame is always gonna feel more "nimble," but that nimbleness might pale when compared to the discomfort from a frame that is the wrong size. Why are you looking at buying a cross bike? Wanna race and/or ride trails? If yes, sizing is super important. Long rides or touring? Ditto. But if you are looking for a short distance commuter or beater bike, who cares as long as you can get a seatpost that fits you.

For the record, I ride a 54 crosshairs, and I am about the same heighth and inseam as yourself. I shied away from the 56 because I race and the standover was an issue, or so I thought at the time. Fortunately the 54 works fine, but if I had to do it over again, I would go with the 56. I ride a 56 Cannondale Six13, and just ordered a 58 Gunnar Roadie. Top Tube measurement and considering how far of a drop you can achieve from seat to bars is much more important than standover. For a little more on the issue look here. For a lot more on size questions, search the road forum.
Yossarian12 is offline  
Old 10-31-09, 07:35 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 105
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for all your input everyone. Here's my dilemma. I just had my bike shop order me a 2008 Jamis Aurora Elite 53 cm (non-sloping top tube). It is really the Nova frame disguised as a tourer. I really liked the fit and feel of the bike. Now I'm thinking of buying my friend's Gunnar and selling the Aurora Elite on Ebay or Craigslist.. or just keeping the Aurora Elite. The Aurora Elite looks considerable larger next to the Gunnar. It doesn't help that I'm the most indecisive human being on the planet.

If I plan on racing cross, isn't a smaller frame the norm?
Someone just tell me what to do... my head's about to explode.
ptn206 is offline  
Old 11-01-09, 05:14 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
Caveman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 131

Bikes: Cervelo RS, Pivot Mach 5.7, Cannondale Capo, Litespeed Arenberg, Litespeed Ultimate Gravel, Surly Krampus

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 7 Posts
At first I thought a 52 would be too small for you. However, after looking at the frame geometry link posted above I think you should be okay. The Crosshair doesn't have a sloping top tube so the listed TT length is what matters as far as sizing goes. It's listed as 540mm which is essentially the same as most 54cm frames. At 5' 10" a 54 isn't off base especially for a CX bike. I'm 6' and I ride a 54cm that has an effective TT length of 545mm. I probably should be on my brands version of a 56 (555mm eff TT) but I don't find the 54 to be too small and the TT is just about the same as the Crosshair you are considering. If you have any doubts haul the bike down to your LBS and have them see what they think. If you do any regular business there they shouldn't have a problem giving you their professional opinion.

Last edited by Caveman; 11-01-09 at 05:18 PM.
Caveman is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.