Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    35
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Jake vs Tricross Triple?

    With spring here, its time to get my own wheels (been borrowing my wife's Dew). I'm of two minds, one is to get a Cyclocross the other is a hybrid. Will be riding on roads and flat, fairly smooth gravel bike trails. I'm edging toward Cyclocross because of the handlebars and they're more what I'm used to (road bike).

    Of the Cyclocross bikes, I've narrowed to the Kona Jake or the Specialized Tricross Triple. They seem to be in the same price point (my local dealer has the 2009 Jake the Snake for the same price as the 2010 Jake - $999cdn, but its a 58cm, I'm 56cm) .

    Of these which would be the better choice?

  2. #2
    Devil's Advocate
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Tampa
    My Bikes
    Sterling Road bike, Chromolly Specialized Allez, Bianchi was given to me don't know model
    Posts
    134
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As long as your not too much closer to riding a 54 than a 58 you should be able to put on a stem that's 20 mil shorter than the current one and the reach would be exactly the same as a 56. The Kona Jake the Snake is easily the best option of the bikes your looking at, I would definitely ride it first, but if it doesn't feel too big that would be the way to go.

    As far as your being torn between cyclocross and hybrid, unless you plan on strictly relaxed trails, cyclocross is the way to go. With a change of tires it becomes a functional road bike, with racks and fenders it becomes a very serviceable touring or commuting bike, and if you like riding it as is, it has the perfect fusion of comfort and performance. A hybrid bike might be a bit more comfortable, but by no means is a cross bike uncomfortable, and I really don't see any other advantage you would have by going with a hybrid.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Montreal
    My Bikes
    Peugeot Hybrid, Minelli Hybrid
    Posts
    6,521
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you are not doing hills go for the JTS (105 double) with mods mentioned by Capt Jake. Otherwise go with the colour you like best.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    35
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The bike shop has had the JTS since at least last Aug, because that's when I first road it. It seemed a bit big at the time. I'm 5"9 (or 10") with a 31" inseam. I was admiring the bike on Saturday and they pretty much told me again it was too big for me...so I'm guessing it likely is or they'd sell it to me.

    Suppose I could always try it for a year, then give it to my 6'2", 14 year old son if I can talk him into it.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    SW Washington
    My Bikes
    '10 C'Dale CAAD9 4, '09 S-Works Tricross, Gary Fisher Tassahara
    Posts
    167
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would think that a 58 will be too big. I am 6' with a 33.5 inseam and I ride a 58.
    2009 Specialized S-Works Carbon Tricoss
    2010 Cannondale CAAD9 4
    Gary Fisher Tassahara

  6. #6
    Team Water Andy_K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Jake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 1999 Kona Muni Mula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker
    Posts
    6,809
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 5'9" and ride a 52cm Jake. I can't imagine the 58 would fit you. Eliminating that, the only thing I can see that the TriCross Triple has going for it is the carbon fork. The components on the Jake are better than on the base Tri Cross triple (I believe 2300 components are basically Sora-level). If you can swing it in the budget, the Kona Jake the Snake is a nice upgrade over either, but then again you might like the triple crankset on the base Jake.

  7. #7
    Devil's Advocate
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Tampa
    My Bikes
    Sterling Road bike, Chromolly Specialized Allez, Bianchi was given to me don't know model
    Posts
    134
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The JST is definitely too big, I'm 5' 11'' with a 32" inseam and I ride a 54.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    35
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well, most think JTS in the right sized frame is the way to go of these options. How about that verses the Specialized Tricross Comp?

  9. #9
    FNG Jabba Degrassi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    My Bikes
    2008 IRO Angus, 2008 Jamis Exile 29er
    Posts
    2,313
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Seconding (or fifthing, I lost count) the too big comment. We are pretty much the exact same height (5'10") and inseam. I was just testing the 56 and 54 JTS today, and the 54 had a good horizontal fit, but I had no stand-over clearance. I'm going with a 54 anyway. With legs like ours you can either have stand-over or a top-tube length that fits, not both. I went with stand-over on the Angus and regretted it. Look at all the seatpost and stem I'm showing, all so my bike will fit properly when I'm not riding it.
    velospace: Angus | Exile | Jake The Snake

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    35
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just had one of the bike shops that told me back in Sept. that I was 56cm that I'm really 54cm!? They also had the same bike I looked at back then, now discounted - a 2009 Tricross Sport 56cm for $1100cdn cash. I remember it seems large when I road it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •