Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    304
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Sram apex in a 1*10 set up

    So thinking about building out a new cross bike and was wondering about using the new sram apex in a 1*10 configuration with the 11*32 cassette in the rear . Does anyone see an issues with this ? What do people usually use on the front 39 or 42 when running a single ring?

  2. #2
    Carpe Diem bdcheung's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    MABRA
    My Bikes
    2007 CAAD9; 2008 Giant Bowery; 2008 Surly Crosscheck
    Posts
    13,132
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That should work fine.

    As far as the single front goes, here is some food for thought...

    Assuming a 700x32c wheel and tire:
    39x11 @ 100rpm = 28.5mph
    40x11 @ 100rpm = 29.2mph
    42x11 @ 100rpm = 30.7mph
    "When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
    ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Would you be able to get away with a short cage RD or need to go to a long cage with that configuration? I was thinking the same thing but didn't want to have to put a long cage RD on.

  4. #4
    Have bike, will travel Barrettscv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Windy City
    My Bikes
    A road bike for every purpose
    Posts
    9,215
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm running the 11-32 Apex cassette with Ultegra and works great. A short arm should be fine on a 1 X 10 set-up.

    Michael

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    304
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Barrettscv View Post
    I'm running the 11-32 Apex cassette with Ultegra and works great. A short arm should be fine on a 1 X 10 set-up.

    Michael
    wait I thought you need the apex RD to work with the cassette?

  6. #6
    Team Water Andy_K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Jake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 1999 Kona Muni Mula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker
    Posts
    6,983
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by johnism View Post
    wait I thought you need the apex RD to work with the cassette?
    The SRAM RD and shifters need to be matched, but the cassettes have the same spacing as Shimano.

    I've had issues with a short cage derailleur and a 32T cog before. The upper pulley didn't have enough space between it and the cog.

  7. #7
    Have bike, will travel Barrettscv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Windy City
    My Bikes
    A road bike for every purpose
    Posts
    9,215
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy_K View Post
    The SRAM RD and shifters need to be matched, but the cassettes have the same spacing as Shimano.

    I've had issues with a short cage derailleur and a 32T cog before. The upper pulley didn't have enough space between it and the cog.
    This can be a problem, The Ultegra is rated at a 27 max cog size, but there is tolerance built into the spec.

    It's the combination of hanger design & derailleur that determines the fit. My Lynskey frame in combination with the 6600 Ultrgra works great. YMMV.

    Use a long arm Shimano Deore SGS, it is rated for a 34 and will work for sure. Nothing wrong with using the Sram Apex Shifters/Deraillers/Cassettes either ;-).


    Michael
    Last edited by Barrettscv; 09-28-10 at 08:46 AM.

  8. #8
    Cat 4 roadkill
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    191
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What are you going to be using the bike for? Cross racing, singletrack, commuting, pseudo-road bike? The only use I can honestly see for a 1x10 with such a wide gear range is for a dedicated singletrack/mtb trail bike, in which case I'd rather just buy a mountain bike.

    If you're using it as a pseudo-road bike, you'll hate the 42x11 max gear. You won't be able to keep up with roadie friends once the grade starts to slope downhill. This is a criticism of the 1x10 setup, not the gear range.

    If you're using it for cross racing, at least in my experience (Central TX), you'll have very little use for the low gears. I'm of the mindset that anything you can't ride in 39x23 is a run-up. My opinion may be biased, because that's the low gear I'm packing on my cross bike, and also because I'm a roadie with crappy MTB skills. It's easier, and more importantly, faster, to throw the bike over your shoulder and run than it is to try to recover once you try to ride something steep and fail halfway up.

    For what it's worth, my cross bike does double duty as a commuter and a cross racer. I occasionally hit some tamer singletrack, but not enough to pick my gear range for that application. Once in a blue moon, I ride it as a pseudo-road bike, but most of its road use is commuting. Still, I'm running road bike gearing on it: a 53/39 up front with an 11-23 or 12-23 on the back, with no particular rhyme or reason to the choice of cassette (whatever's on the wheels I happen to be using).

    I have never had the occasion to use the 53t ring off-road, but it's nice on the commute, and it helps keep the chain on. I have yet to race it on a pavement-heavy course, however; it's entirely possible that I'll run into a situation where 39x11 is not enough gear. Most of the racing around here keeps me in the 39x23-17 range, though.

  9. #9
    Team Water Andy_K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Jake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 1999 Kona Muni Mula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker
    Posts
    6,983
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by pretzelface View Post
    I'm of the mindset that anything you can't ride in 39x23 is a run-up. My opinion may be biased, because that's the low gear I'm packing on my cross bike, and also because I'm a roadie with crappy MTB skills. It's easier, and more importantly, faster, to throw the bike over your shoulder and run than it is to try to recover once you try to ride something steep and fail halfway up.
    Can we talk about this? I hear and read this all the time, and I'm starting to think it's wrong.

    Let me throw out some numbers. At a cadence of 40 rpm (seriously mashing), you'd get the following speeds with the respective gear ratios:

    39x23 => 5.5 mph
    39x25 => 5.0 mph
    39x27 => 4.7 mph
    36x23 => 5.1 mph
    36x25 => 4.7 mph
    36x27 => 4.3 mph

    At 60 rpm (still mashing), you get these speeds:

    39x23 => 8.2 mph
    39x25 => 7.6 mph
    39x27 => 7.0 mph
    36x23 => 7.6 mph
    36x25 => 7.0 mph
    36x27 => 6.5 mph

    Now the question is, how fast are you going to run up that hill? If it's a short hill, and you can bound up it, then probably you want to do that, but for longer hills, I don't think so. I think we'd all agree that it's all about efficiency. In most circumstances, riding is more efficient than running. So, it seems to me that unless you aren't going to be able to ride the hill, you should ride it, regardless of gearing.

    So it seems to me that the only argument that holds water is to say, "It's better/faster/more efficient to run a hill than to try to ride it and fail" (which is what you actually said), but this is distinctly different from the typical argument I hear that "If I can't ride it in X gear, then it's better/faster/more efficient to run it."

    Given the above reasoning, I think it makes sense to give yourself the lowest gearing you might need. There are a few races around here with substantial hills, and I've decided to bring a 50-39-30 triple with a 12-27 cassette to those races. At the first of these a couple of weeks ago, I used the 30-27 gear and was riding past people who were "running" up the hill.

    I'm not trying to be beligerent here. I really would like to hear the logic from the other side.

  10. #10
    Cat 4 roadkill
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    191
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy_K View Post
    Given the above reasoning, I think it makes sense to give yourself the lowest gearing you might need. There are a few races around here with substantial hills, and I've decided to bring a 50-39-30 triple with a 12-27 cassette to those races. At the first of these a couple of weeks ago, I used the 30-27 gear and was riding past people who were "running" up the hill.

    I'm not trying to be beligerent here. I really would like to hear the logic from the other side.
    That's why I qualified my post with my location - those types of hills just don't exist on CX courses around here. I've never traveled further than San Antonio for cyclocross, though, so my experience is admittedly very limited, geographically.

  11. #11
    Team Water Andy_K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Jake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 1999 Kona Muni Mula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker
    Posts
    6,983
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by pretzelface View Post
    That's why I qualified my post with my location - those types of hills just don't exist on CX courses around here. I've never traveled further than San Antonio for cyclocross, though, so my experience is admittedly very limited, geographically.
    I thought Austin was the part of Texas that wasn't flat. I guess that's relative.

  12. #12
    cycle-dog spot DinoShepherd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Look, Niner, Ellsworth, Norco, Litespeed
    Posts
    1,452
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I run 11-32 with a 44t ring.

    -Z

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •