Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    I think I"ve picked one but I have a question...

    Ok, LBS's within 3 hours have nothing in my size... So I'll be ordering a bike and largely sight unseen... but I'm not afraid.. as a total noob cyclist I will have nothing to compare it too and thus I'll be thrilled with whatever I get.

    Now, I have largely decided on the Kona Jake based on the fact at the entry level price ($1100-1000) point it seems to have the best set of components... (am I wrong?)

    I am salivating over the Kona Jake the Snake and considering it despite the fact that at $1600ish it's really in the I can't afford it range... especially since I have to buy a helmet, rack accessory for my Yak bars, and lock (at a minimum).

    Now... I noticed that the Kona Jack seems to have 30 gears (50/39/30 - Tiagra Front Derailer)... while the upgrade Jake the Snake only has 20 gears (46/36 crank - 105 Front Derailer)... compact? Still I'm wondering why that is? Isn't more gears better? I recall being advised to get a large gearing range since I live in a very hilly area.

    Anyway very confused by this...

    Ken

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    My Bikes
    2011 Cervelo S2, 2001Trek USPS 5200, 06 Cervelo P3 Alum, 1999 Schwinn Pro Stock BMX, 1987 Schwinn Traveler
    Posts
    6,998
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    More gears are heavier, and more stuff to go wrong. A lot of CX guys myself included don't even use a front derailleur. 39t 11-28 seems to be good enough for me so far. I can't see any reason why you would need anything more. Tiagra is lower end than 105 too, that's where the price difference would be not the additional gearing. Neither one are very great anyway, they are lower end components. I say get the cheap one, and replace stuff as it breaks. That is what I would do.

  3. #3
    Senior Member igknighted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Somerville, MA
    Posts
    414
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Are you racing this bike, or riding it as a road/commute/touring/winter bike? If it's a race bike, mud + triple crank is not good. Also, the 30t and 50t are worthless for racing CX. The 46t and 36t are race-able gears, hence why they are included on the more race-like bike. If you are using it for general riding, then get the triple (46t/36t is going to limit you on the road). More != better in all cases. Having the right gearing matters, and in some cases that is more, and in other cases that may mean less.
    Road: 2011 Specialized Tarmac Comp Rival
    Cross: 2010 Trek XO-1, Force/Rival
    Commuter: Ancient Trek MTB, SS Conversion, all the Fredly racks & lights you could need
    MTB: 2001 Kona Stuff

  4. #4
    Ridin' South Cackalacky dahut's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,924
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Cant go wrong with a Kona, if you can pay for it. Even if you think it sucks, you wont lose much money in the resell.
    "Watch out for giants; they are boorish fools with tongues wagging, drunk upon their own words.
    They will try to teach you a lesson if given the chance, and you will stumble over their stinking feet."

  5. #5
    Mud, Gore & Guts eddubal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Bloomfield, NJ
    My Bikes
    2012 Van Dessel Gin & Trombones; 2011 Masi Speciale SSCX; '87 Peugeot Cannonball Express
    Posts
    497
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If the Kona Jake is in your price comfort range, then go for it! You've made a good choice. As a noob, you're going to be doing a lot of learning. It's best to use a less expensive bike for that. Once you have more experience, you can either upgrade componentry, or sell and buy a new one. The Kona's a good one for this. The frames between the levels are very similar, so you can eventually upgrade your components to be as good as the Jake the Snake which is a more race ready bike. Unless you know exactly what you want component-wise, it's better to buy a good frame with decent components (like youre doing) so you can upgrade the components as they break or get tired and end up with a great bike. Do the reverse, and you're trying to turn a sow's ear into a silk purse.

    Having read in your earlier thread that you're using this as a multipurpose bike, the larger 50 CR is going to serve you well. It'll be more fun on the road. If you find you don't need a triple, you can either swap the crankset (read upgrade), or simply pull off the CR(s) that you don't use and possibly install a guard.

    Enjoy. It'll serve you well.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •