Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Recreational Cyclocross and Gravelbiking This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like :The Dirty Kanza". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-18-11, 09:00 AM   #1
mtalinm
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
mtalinm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Westwood MA (just south of Boston)
Bikes: 2009 Trek Soho
Posts: 2,214
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
centerpulls vs. v-brakes w/TravelAgent or new STI levers

this is actually for a folding bike, but I figured the canti experts are on this forum...

I want to use drop bars with 406 wheels. on the Xootr Swift frame, there are bosses that mount cantis at the right height for 406s. I am wondering whether I should use the stock v-brakes with the TravelAgent pull adapter vs. just mounting centerpull brakes on those bosses.

I love the performance of the V-Brakes, but I have heard mixed reviews of TravelAgent (some great, some lousy). Centerpulls seem to be all over the place, but if willing to shell out $ for, say, Shorty Avid Ultimates, performance should be good. I'm a Clyde & so need all the stopping power I can get.

Lastly, I heard a rumor that newer Shimano STI levers are compatible with V-Brakes. this folder happens to be using some brand-new Tiagra levers, so I suppose I could try that first and see what happens. Any insights there?
mtalinm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-11, 10:23 PM   #2
DinoShepherd
cycle-dog spot
 
DinoShepherd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Bikes: Look, Niner, Ellsworth, Norco, Litespeed
Posts: 1,539
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
What you really want is the new TRP mini-V's.

They work great and are a piece of forged and machined art.

Absolutely love them. They killed all the fork chatter under braking I had, super easy to setup and just work great.

No reason to mess around with canti's or any adapter thingies.

- Z
DinoShepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-11, 06:07 AM   #3
eddubal
Mud, Gore & Guts
 
eddubal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bloomfield, NJ
Bikes: 2012 Van Dessel Gin & Trombones; 2011 Masi Speciale SSCX; '87 Peugeot Cannonball Express
Posts: 497
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If the v-brakes with travel agents come standard on the bike I'd try that before sinking money into it. Likely, if the revues have been so bipolar, it's a matter of adjustment or pads that are the problem. I haven't heard anything bad about the T-As. If you find that you don't like the stock setup, the TRP mini-V's are definitely the way to go. Since it sounds like you don't have to worry about mud, you don't need to think about the clearances that cantis have.
eddubal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-11, 08:15 AM   #4
Barrettscv 
Have bike, will travel
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edwardsville, Illinois
Bikes: De Rosa Super Prestige, Colnago Nuova Mexico, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Pinarello Gavia, Schwinn Paramount, Motobecane Grand Record, Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Origin8 monstercross, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2
Posts: 10,769
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 148 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DinoShepherd View Post
What you really want is the new TRP mini-V's.

They work great and are a piece of forged and machined art.

Absolutely love them. They killed all the fork chatter under braking I had, super easy to setup and just work great.

No reason to mess around with canti's or any adapter thingies.

- Z
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddubal View Post
If the v-brakes with travel agents come standard on the bike I'd try that before sinking money into it. Likely, if the revues have been so bipolar, it's a matter of adjustment or pads that are the problem. I haven't heard anything bad about the T-As. If you find that you don't like the stock setup, the TRP mini-V's are definitely the way to go. Since it sounds like you don't have to worry about mud, you don't need to think about the clearances that cantis have.
Are there the Mini V's you suggest? http://www.tektro.com/_english/01_pr...e&sort=1&fid=2
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
Barrettscv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-11, 12:23 PM   #5
eddubal
Mud, Gore & Guts
 
eddubal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bloomfield, NJ
Bikes: 2012 Van Dessel Gin & Trombones; 2011 Masi Speciale SSCX; '87 Peugeot Cannonball Express
Posts: 497
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The CX-9s were the ones that I was thinking of, but the RX-6s seem to be a less expensive version.
eddubal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-11, 03:29 PM   #6
Andy_K 
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Bikes: 2013 Kona Jake, 2015 Kona Jake the Snake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 2006 Kona Kula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2001 LeMond Buenos Aires, 1984 Pinarello Gran Turismo, 1982 Trek 614, 1978 Austro-Daimler, 1987 Pinarello Montello
Posts: 9,170
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 303 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddubal View Post
The CX-9s were the ones that I was thinking of, but the RX-6s seem to be a less expensive version.
Just looking at the site, I see they have a CX 8.4 now also, which is supposed to work better with SRAM and Campagnolo levers. The difference between the CX-9 and the CX-8.4, apart from appearance, seems to be arm length (90 vs 84 mm). This is interesting because the one complain I've read about the CX-9's is that they're too powerful (which I take to mean they lack modulation). The shorter arm should take care of that. Coming back around to the Tektro branded brakes, the RX-5 has an 85 mm arm while the RX-6 has a 90 mm arm. There's also a Tektro BMX mini-V which has an 80 mm arm.

So, for SRAM or Campagnolo (and possibly older Shimano), the CX-5 may be better than the CX-6. Curiously, the claimed weight is lower for the Tekro branded mini-V's than the TRP's. The TRP's definitely look nicer and have built-in barrel adjusters, but one would hope the extra money also gets you a stiffer brake.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-11, 12:02 AM   #7
DinoShepherd
cycle-dog spot
 
DinoShepherd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Bikes: Look, Niner, Ellsworth, Norco, Litespeed
Posts: 1,539
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrettscv View Post
Are there the Mini V's you suggest? http://www.tektro.com/_english/01_pr...e&sort=1&fid=2
I have the TRP 8.4s, which (in theory) should allow a bit more pad clearance and less power than the 9s. In any event, they are great. And plenty of power to put the bike on its nose.

You'll love them.
DinoShepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:26 AM.