Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Fredericton, NB, Canada
    My Bikes
    2010 S1, 2011 F75X
    Posts
    1,424
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Carbon vs Alum Tubulars

    Tubular is better for cross - that goes without saying.

    But the real question thats burning in my brain is carbon or aluminum? I had moderate success last year running the stock clincher setup on my Felt F75x - getting away with pressures of 35-38psi or so. No pinch flats yet, but its only a matter of time.

    I am going to order a tubular wheel set this year for the fall season, but I'm trying to determine the pros and cons of either wheel.

    Carbon Pros
    - Bling
    - Weight
    - Deeper section "apparently" is better in deep sand and mud.
    - Can use in the summer as a road tubular wheel

    Carbon Cons
    - Cost. Not only initial cost, but also replacement. We all know in cross, run it only if you can afford to break it.
    - Braking performance, even worse when wet
    - Brake pads - requires dedicated pads. Pit wheels are aluminum which pose a problem
    - Durability. No doubt they are stiff, but what about bottoming out on a rock or root?

    Aluminum Pros
    - Cheaper
    - No need to change brake pads
    - More durable during a bottom out??

    Aluminum Cons
    - Heavier (marginally)
    - Utilitarian looking
    - Not worth (IMO) using as a road tubular for summer - I have Soul 3.0SL clinchers


    So there are the factors as I see them. I'm a Cat B racer, so there's tons of room for improvement fitness and bike handling wise, but does the extra cost/risks worth it going carbon?

    BTW, both are 23mm wide - carbons are 38mm deep and the aluminums are Major Tom based.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,999
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Two pair alloy tubulars, one with all-rounders (i.e. Grifo or Fango) and one with mud tires (i.e. Limus).

  3. #3
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    40,102
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yea there is the Deep Mud and Sand Plough secondary function..

  4. #4
    Senior Member GrayJay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    EagleRiver AK
    Posts
    1,225
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Test results I saw showed that tired glued to carbon rim only has about 75% of the roll-off resistance strength of same tire & glue on well prepared alloy rims.

    CX magazine did test last year and pretty much concluded that deep dish rims were not an advantage in deep mud. Tall sides on the rim provide more surface for friction as they cut through the mud. Look at the rims that the euro pros are riding for CX this past season, most of them have gone back to using much shallower rim depth and what was in fasion 2-3 years back.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •