Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    15
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Difference between road bike and cyclocross sizing?

    I was in my lbs and checking a semi-entry level road bike, the Trek 1.2. They fit me to a 58 frame and it seemed nice. While I was looking around, I saw a 2011 Lane on clearance for a similar price. I really liked the stealthy blacked out look and semi-trail capabilities. It also rode pretty smooth. The thing that confused me is that this was a 52 frame!?! How can I be on the end of the scale for one bike and then the other side for the other? Who is riding the 60 frame Lane with a stand over of 34 in?

  2. #2
    Papaya King waynesworld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio (Grandview area)
    My Bikes
    2009 Felt X City D, 1985 (?) Trek 400, 1995 (?) Specialized Rockhopper, 1995 Trek 850
    Posts
    1,640
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Historically, CX bikes have had higher standover heights because of higher bottom bracket heights. I'm not sure how universal this is today. Actually, nothing is universal it seems, and bike geometries seem to vary all over the place. Lots of CX bikes do seem to size larger than stated, though.

    I ride a 2010 Kona Jake in 54 cm, and a 2011 BMC Streetracer in 57 cm. They both fit me pretty well, though I'm considering a slightly longer stem for the Kona. The BMC has a slightly more relaxed geometry than a true racing bike, with a slightly taller headtube, which probably makes it a bit more comfortable than some. For me, at least. I was considering a Felt Z series until the BMC went on clearance last fall. Or maybe a Cannondale Synapse.

    I'm not sure I helped much, but it really isn't uncommon to ride a size or two smaller CX bike than road bike. They're all different, though.
    Quote Originally Posted by rumrunn6 View Post
    walk right in and punch the first guy you meet in the head
    2011 BMC SR02, 2010 Kona Jake, 2009 Felt X City D, 1984 (?) Trek 400, 1995 Trek 850

  3. #3
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    39,040
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    + it is a measure, perhaps, of the tippy top of the seat collar/ lug,
    and some use a different top point to call 'size' ..
    Best to take out a measuring tape of your own,
    so you measure to the same points.

    sloping top tube really throws size data off.. get virtual top tube length too..
    as if level..

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Denver, CO
    My Bikes
    2012 Specialized Crux, Schwinn Mesa
    Posts
    564
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When I tried a Caad10 I was sized at a 58 but on the crux that I ended up buying I was sized at a 56. Now since its not the same brand it could be that or it could be due to the type of bike and geometry.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    898
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by KT043 View Post
    I was in my lbs and checking a semi-entry level road bike, the Trek 1.2. They fit me to a 58 frame and it seemed nice. While I was looking around, I saw a 2011 Lane on clearance for a similar price. I really liked the stealthy blacked out look and semi-trail capabilities. It also rode pretty smooth. The thing that confused me is that this was a 52 frame!?! How can I be on the end of the scale for one bike and then the other side for the other? Who is riding the 60 frame Lane with a stand over of 34 in?
    Typically, a cross bike will fit with about 1 to 2cm shorter in reach and 1 to 2 cm shorter on the seat tube with all things being equal. Incidentally, I ride a 52cm Trek carbon while I ride a 51cm Masi Speciale CX. There must be some mistake in the tagging on the bike sizes. A 52cm Trek Lane is similar to a 52cm Trek 1.2 in terms of fitting if you examine the length of the top tube. It's quite normal for bikes being tagged incorrectly! In fact, my Masi Speciale CX was tagged on the invoice as being a 58cm and in fact it has a label stuck with 58cm when in fact, measuring the top tube yielded the size that is a 51cm. After fitting professionally, the fitter agreed the size tag was wrong from the factory!
    Trek 5000 carbon road bike
    Masi Speciale CX touring bike
    Dahon Mu SL (performance hybrid road bike)
    Dahon Speed Duo (slow poker shopper or coffee getter bike)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •