Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    314
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Shimano CX70 Fr. Der. - compatible w/ Campy Ergo

    Does anyone know if the Shimano FD-CX70 Front Derailleur is compatible with the Campy Ergo (left front shifter)?

    http://bike.shimano.com/publish/cont...-.fd_road.html

    I am assuming that it is since there is some trim in the shift.

    I am looking for the lowest profile front double derailleur that will work. My rear wheel (on a Canonndale Cyclocross 5 CAAD9) with a 35 tire leaves very little room for the derailed to be mounted and seems like it will be a mud catcher.

  2. #2
    Team Beer Cynikal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Sacramento CA
    My Bikes
    Too Many
    Posts
    5,765
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can't figure out why the RD and the tire would conflict with each other. I had a CX-9 frame with a rival FD and 34mm tufo's. There was never a conflict. Do you have the parts on the bike or just anticipating issues?
    I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    7,118
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If it is an original preQS ero it will shift about anything you can hook it to including 3spd hubs. I believe the QS has a little shorter cable pull but I can't see it not working with a double. They should work with most triples fr that manner.

    I also don't see why the proper campy FD will be an issue.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    314
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Cynikal - it is the front derailleur (not RD) that is tight. The rear triangle on the Canondale is super tight. Maybe my 35s are on the big side. I am building up the frame and the only 34.9mm FD I have is a MTB triple and it almost hits the tire.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cynikal View Post
    I can't figure out why the RD and the tire would conflict with each other. I had a CX-9 frame with a rival FD and 34mm tufo's. There was never a conflict. Do you have the parts on the bike or just anticipating issues?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    7,118
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Use a road FD (double) that matches your group. It should be fine.

  6. #6
    Team Beer Cynikal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Sacramento CA
    My Bikes
    Too Many
    Posts
    5,765
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sorry that was a typo. I meant FD. I've had that same frame and use a standard FD with fat tires without issue.
    I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    314
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thank you
    Quote Originally Posted by Cynikal View Post
    Sorry that was a typo. I meant FD. I've had that same frame and use a standard FD with fat tires without issue.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    314
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just bought the CX70 fr derailleur - Jenson price matched Nashbar's $51.99 price: http://www.jensonusa.com/Shimano-CX7...ont-Derailleur


    and shipping was free.


    Also pulled the trigger on the CX70 brakes: http://www.jensonusa.com/Shimano-CX70-Canti-Brake


    Still considering the solid CX50 cranks (vs the hollow CX70s)

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    7,118
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    why all shimano with campy ergos? it is a common solution to upgrading older bikes (shimano 8spd w/ campy 10 ergos) but isnt a common choice for new builds. campy 11 ergos controlling shimano 9spd would likely be a great cross setup if that is what you have planned. cheap chains and cassettes plus better ergonomics.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    314
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have an ancient Sachs (re-branded Campy) 8 sp pair of Ergos that I plan to use: http://velospace.org/forums/discussi...eed-these-are/ with a 8 sp Shimano cassette (both 4.8 mm spacing). Shimano brifters, in my experience don't last very long, can't be re-built easily, and don't survive crashes well. The Campy Ergos are seemingly trouble free. I have a stock bike with all Campy Veloce and 9sp Ergos; and a drop-bar "mostercross" MTB with 8sp Ergos on a 7speed Shimano cassette (both 5mm spacing) which shifts great.

    See Sheldon Brown's Cassette Spacing Cribsheet:
    : http://sheldonbrown.com/cribsheet-spacing.html


    Shimano 7-speed: 5.0 mm
    Shimano 8-speed: 4.8 mm
    Campagnolo 8-speed: 5.0 mm
    Sachs 1997 8-speed: 5.0 mm
    Sachs 1998+ 8-speed: 4.8 mm






    Quote Originally Posted by thirdgenbird View Post
    why all shimano with campy ergos? it is a common solution to upgrading older bikes (shimano 8spd w/ campy 10 ergos) but isnt a common choice for new builds. campy 11 ergos controlling shimano 9spd would likely be a great cross setup if that is what you have planned. cheap chains and cassettes plus better ergonomics.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    7,118
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wasnt thinking about the shimano spaced Sachs ergos. That should work well. I can't stand sti either.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •