Smaller crank arms for cross
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 513
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
3 Posts
Smaller crank arms for cross
I was about to pull the trigger on new 175mm cranks; But am now considering going w/ smaller cranks 172.5 after reading this: https://sheldonbrown.com/cranks.html
Looking at OEM cross bikes, it seems that the cranks are 2.5mm shorter than road bike equals. Is this for toe clearancein the turns, or for easier spinning up hills.
What is the general consensus?
Looking at OEM cross bikes, it seems that the cranks are 2.5mm shorter than road bike equals. Is this for toe clearancein the turns, or for easier spinning up hills.
What is the general consensus?
#2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 513
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
3 Posts
Do the shorter CX cranks feel weird coming from longer on a road bike? I am 6'-4" tall, and until now never considered shorter cranks.
CX = higher BB for clearance + shorter cranks for spin
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,075
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
What is your inseam? My initial thought is at 6'4" you are going to want 175s. I am 6'1" with a 34" inseam and went from 172.5s to 175s. It doesn't make a big difference but longer cranks give you more leverage for steep climbs and technical terrain.
You will gain a little clearance with the shorter cranks but ultimately bb position will dictate pedal strike and toe overlap. I've got no problems spinning 175s and 180s (100rpm average according to my garmin) and my legs are likely shooter than yours.
You will gain a little clearance with the shorter cranks but ultimately bb position will dictate pedal strike and toe overlap. I've got no problems spinning 175s and 180s (100rpm average according to my garmin) and my legs are likely shooter than yours.
#4
Team Beer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 6,339
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 159 Times
in
104 Posts
Most modern CX frames don't have a high BB like older CX frames. Clipless pedals made it unnecessary. Granted the larger tires will raise up the whole bike a bit. I'd just stick to what you ride on the road or can get a good deal on.
Your frame is BB30 right? Are you using an adapter to get shimano cranks in there?
Your frame is BB30 right? Are you using an adapter to get shimano cranks in there?
__________________
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 11,375
Bikes: '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2015 Trek Domane 6.2 disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
I'm 6'6" with a 36" inseam and I ride 175mm on my distance, commuter, brevet, and mountain bikes. I put a 172.5mm crank on my CX bike this year, swapping out from the 175mm I had last year.
If I was blindfolded and told to pedal one, then the other, I don't think I could tell you the difference.
If I was blindfolded and told to pedal one, then the other, I don't think I could tell you the difference.
__________________
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 513
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
3 Posts
Yes, FSA BB30 to 68mm threaded adapter.
Most modern CX frames don't have a high BB like older CX frames. Clipless pedals made it unnecessary. Granted the larger tires will raise up the whole bike a bit. I'd just stick to what you ride on the road or can get a good deal on.
Your frame is BB30 right? Are you using an adapter to get shimano cranks in there?
Your frame is BB30 right? Are you using an adapter to get shimano cranks in there?
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 513
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
3 Posts
My inseam is 35"
What is your inseam? My initial thought is at 6'4" you are going to want 175s. I am 6'1" with a 34" inseam and went from 172.5s to 175s. It doesn't make a big difference but longer cranks give you more leverage for steep climbs and technical terrain.
You will gain a little clearance with the shorter cranks but ultimately bb position will dictate pedal strike and toe overlap. I've got no problems spinning 175s and 180s (100rpm average according to my garmin) and my legs are likely shooter than yours.
You will gain a little clearance with the shorter cranks but ultimately bb position will dictate pedal strike and toe overlap. I've got no problems spinning 175s and 180s (100rpm average according to my garmin) and my legs are likely shooter than yours.
#8
Team Beer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 6,339
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 159 Times
in
104 Posts
If you are buying a new crank, why not get a BB30 crank?
__________________
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
friday1970
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
53
12-17-21 03:19 PM
Sito
Fitting Your Bike
7
08-10-16 11:50 AM