Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 22 of 22
  1. #1
    yac
    yac is offline
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    2013 Kona Jake vs 2012 Kona Jake

    New to biking and been creeping this forum. Lots of awesome information!

    I have been eyeing the Kona Jake. I was told by the LBS that it would be announced this week. Lo and behold, pictures were posted by Kona yesterday.

    The differences that they state are
    • Of course the Tekro Lyra disc brakes with 140mm rotors (Replacing tektro oryx cantis)
    • Different rear triangle (more horizontal from my understanding)



    The differences I noticed are
    • Alex Black dragon wheels (replacing Alex AT-450, I'm assuming due to the disc brakes)
    • Freedom Ryder tires (replacing Maxxis Mud Wrestlers)
    • Tiagra rear derailleur (replacing the 105)


    Thoughts? Assuming the stay at the $1150 CAD price point, is the new bike the better buy? Or should I look for the older version and ask for a discount?

    Thanks in advance!
    Last edited by yac; 07-19-12 at 05:39 PM.

  2. #2
    Team Water Andy_K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Jake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 1999 Kona Muni Mula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker
    Posts
    7,023
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Let me start by saying that you have just made my day! I put a disc fork on my 2008 Jake a couple of years ago, but I've been telling myself that I would get a new one as soon as Kona offered a Jake with disc brakes. Sweet!

    That said, the answer to your question depends on whether or not you want disc brakes. The rear derailleur swap is obviously a downgrade, probably done to keep costs at near the same price point. The wheel change is probably just a difference of rim vs. disc brakes and hubs. The tires, I suppose, are an acknowledgement of what's always been obvious...that the base Jake is targeted more as an all-around bike than a CX racer (though it's definitely up to the task of racing).

    The new frame looks and sound nice. The internal shift cable routing is particularly cool.

    I've heard bad things about the Lyra brakes. I'd swap them out for Avid BB7's as soon as possible.

    I wouldn't expect that you'd get a great discount on the 2012 model for a few months, but it's worth asking about. The 2012 model is probably a bit lighter, as disc brakes and the associated bits add weight -- maybe a pound or so.

  3. #3
    Papaya King waynesworld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio (Grandview area)
    My Bikes
    2009 Felt X City D, 1985 (?) Trek 400, 1995 (?) Specialized Rockhopper, 1995 Trek 850
    Posts
    1,640
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Cool! I like these color schemes much better. The Jake and JTS look particularly cool in those pics.
    Quote Originally Posted by rumrunn6 View Post
    walk right in and punch the first guy you meet in the head
    2011 BMC SR02, 2010 Kona Jake, 2009 Felt X City D, 1984 (?) Trek 400, 1995 Trek 850

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Tuscaloosa, AL
    Posts
    498
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the Jake 1 (the one in the link after the Jake the Snake--I may be getting the name wrong)--does anyone know what the price point is generally around for it?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    188
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That Tiagra derailleur is going to shift just as well as the 105 on last year's model; I wouldn't make a choice based on it. Some will say the 105 will last longer but by the time either of them conk out you'll have replaced half the stuff on a bike.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Victoria bc
    My Bikes
    2012 Kona Jack the Snake, 2013 Norco Bigfoot Fat Bike, 2010 Diamondback Insight 1
    Posts
    33
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Discs are where bikes are heading so at least you would be with the curve. I have been looking at the jake line as well and then saw that a ***** inc has disc already. Same price as the snake so I was thinking that a 2012 might come down to tha same level as the base jake soon.

  7. #7
    Team Water Andy_K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Jake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 1999 Kona Muni Mula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker
    Posts
    7,023
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by AMFJ View Post
    the Jake 1 (the one in the link after the Jake the Snake--I may be getting the name wrong)--does anyone know what the price point is generally around for it?
    I would expect it to be under $1200. Historically the base level Jake has been around $1000, but it's creeping up. The 2013 Kona Rove (chromoly monster cross/gravel grinder with Hayes CX-5 discs and Apex) is going to sell for $1699.

  8. #8
    yac
    yac is offline
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks everyone for their input!

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy_K View Post
    I would expect it to be under $1200. Historically the base level Jake has been around $1000, but it's creeping up. The 2013 Kona Rove (chromoly monster cross/gravel grinder with Hayes CX-5 discs and Apex) is going to sell for $1699.
    Andy I belive you are dead on the money... spoke with a store and they said $1199 and a few week till they would be available, distributors already have them but I would assume that they have to wait the 16 days (per Kona's weeksite) before they can sell

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Tuscaloosa, AL
    Posts
    498
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Why does the base level "Jake" come with disk brakes but the Jake the Snake doesn't?

    I'm looking at buying a cross bike for cycloscross racing this season and pretty much have narrowed it down to a Kona model, Cannondale Caad10x (when it comes out) or something from Ridley.

    I'm also trying to figure out if I want to wait for 2013's or go ahead and buy one now and get to training. Trying to learn as much as I can as fast as I can.

  10. #10
    Team Water Andy_K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Jake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 1999 Kona Muni Mula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker
    Posts
    7,023
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by AMFJ View Post
    Why does the base level "Jake" come with disk brakes but the Jake the Snake doesn't?
    Kona seems to be testing the waters before diving in. I'm a bit surprised that it went this way too, but I think it makes sense. Disc brakes are a sure winner on an all-around utility commuter bike, but you could argue that the jury is still out as to whether or not they make sense for racing. Ridley seems to have been ready to place a slightly larger bet, offering discs on their X-Fire and their entry level X-Ride, but their top-of-the-line X-Night still has cantilevers and the X-Fire is available with cantilevers.

    FWIW, I think you can get any Kona model as a frameset from a Kona dealer. If you get a Jake frameset, upgrade the fork and provide your own 105 components you could approximate a Jake the Snake with disc brakes.


    Quote Originally Posted by AMFJ View Post
    I'm looking at buying a cross bike for cycloscross racing this season and pretty much have narrowed it down to a Kona model, Cannondale Caad10x (when it comes out) or something from Ridley.

    I'm also trying to figure out if I want to wait for 2013's or go ahead and buy one now and get to training. Trying to learn as much as I can as fast as I can.
    At this point, you can work on fitness with any bike. If you see something you want in a 2013 model I think it's worth waiting for.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Breathegood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Castle Rock, CO
    My Bikes
    '09 Gary Fisher "Kaitai, '09 Raleigh Team", '91 Trek 8700, '97 Cannondale SR500, '12 Raleigh Twin Six
    Posts
    329
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy_K View Post
    Kona seems to be testing the waters before diving in. I'm a bit surprised that it went this way too, but I think it makes sense. Disc brakes are a sure winner on an all-around utility commuter bike, but you could argue that the jury is still out as to whether or not they make sense for racing. Ridley seems to have been ready to place a slightly larger bet, offering discs on their X-Fire and their entry level X-Ride, but their top-of-the-line X-Night still has cantilevers and the X-Fire is available with cantilevers.
    If I get to be one of the jurors, I say disc brakes on a race bike are too much. I was secretly wishing for discs before I built my bike up. Granted, this summer is my first experience with a cross bike and I live and ride in pretty DRY area, but after having put some miles on the new bike, good canti's have all the stopping prowess I would ever need. Load the bike up with a rack and various commuter gear, and I might be inclined to change my mind, but then it wouldn't be a "race" bike.
    1991 Trek 8700 - SS conversion, 2009 Gary Fisher "Kaitai", 2009 Raleigh Team, 2012 Raleigh Twin Six,1996 Cannondale SR500

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    99
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Breathegood View Post
    If I get to be one of the jurors, I say disc brakes on a race bike are too much. I was secretly wishing for discs before I built my bike up. Granted, this summer is my first experience with a cross bike and I live and ride in pretty DRY area, but after having put some miles on the new bike, good canti's have all the stopping prowess I would ever need. Load the bike up with a rack and various commuter gear, and I might be inclined to change my mind, but then it wouldn't be a "race" bike.
    This is a good point. I wanted a CX bike that's good for racing/touring/commuting with disc brakes. However, since I was going to go for touring this summer and I didn't want to wait another year (because I'll be 4th grade college and I won't have time) I bought Kona Jake 2012. Came with Tektro Oryx cantilever brake. I set it up nicely and it stops adequately, I changed the pads to kool stop and it stops well enough that I thought I was about fall over when I pressed the brake while running fast because a car was intercepting ignoring the signals. When I press the rear brake, it sometimes drags. So I say Cantilever is good enough.

    That being said, if it's loaded with pannier bags and etc, then that might be a different story. I might want a disc brake, but honestly cantilever brakes does the job, considering that I am expressing my opinion using the cheap Tektro Oryx. By the way, I added cross levers on my bike.
    I've got 2012 Kona Jake

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Victoria bc
    My Bikes
    2012 Kona Jack the Snake, 2013 Norco Bigfoot Fat Bike, 2010 Diamondback Insight 1
    Posts
    33
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just saw the 2013 jake today. As noted by others, the 105 has been replaced with tiagra for the rear derailuer. Color is a bland gray. perhaps to make less flashy for thieves. The discs are far from premium. Bike also weighs a bit more. Price was 1199. The 2012 is going down to $1050 so I am thinking that it is wash for value.

  14. #14
    Papaya King waynesworld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio (Grandview area)
    My Bikes
    2009 Felt X City D, 1985 (?) Trek 400, 1995 (?) Specialized Rockhopper, 1995 Trek 850
    Posts
    1,640
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 69isfine View Post
    I just saw the 2013 jake today. As noted by others, the 105 has been replaced with tiagra for the rear derailuer. Color is a bland gray. perhaps to make less flashy for thieves. The discs are far from premium. Bike also weighs a bit more. Price was 1199. The 2012 is going down to $1050 so I am thinking that it is wash for value.
    I like the gray, at least in pics. Can't wait to see one in person. My 2010 Jake is battleship gray, and I love it. Of course, I was a squid for 6 years

    I did not like the paint scheme the past two years. Not the colors really, but the scheme. In the store I thought maybe they weren't too bad. Then I saw one on the street, and it looked hideous.
    Quote Originally Posted by rumrunn6 View Post
    walk right in and punch the first guy you meet in the head
    2011 BMC SR02, 2010 Kona Jake, 2009 Felt X City D, 1984 (?) Trek 400, 1995 Trek 850

  15. #15
    yac
    yac is offline
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 69isfine View Post
    The 2012 is going down to $1050 so I am thinking that it is wash for value.
    Went to the bike store today and got told the 2012 are $1050+tax as well.. I think that will be my number one option right now

  16. #16
    Senior Member Big Lebowski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    My Bikes
    Not a Kilo TT
    Posts
    316
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 69isfine View Post
    I just saw the 2013 jake today. As noted by others, the 105 has been replaced with tiagra for the rear derailuer. Color is a bland gray. perhaps to make less flashy for thieves. The discs are far from premium. Bike also weighs a bit more. Price was 1199. The 2012 is going down to $1050 so I am thinking that it is wash for value.
    This places it well below the 2013 Specialized Tricross Elite Disc Compact @ $1,550. The Specialized has the Avid BB5 disc brakes, but I have no idea how much difference that makes. I'm just looking for a solid commuter that can handle streets and MUP's. I think that either of these would do the job.

  17. #17
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Lebowski View Post
    This places it well below the 2013 Specialized Tricross Elite Disc Compact @ $1,550. The Specialized has the Avid BB5 disc brakes, but I have no idea how much difference that makes. I'm just looking for a solid commuter that can handle streets and MUP's. I think that either of these would do the job.
    Seems like the 2013 Kona Jake is more expensive than expected. Price tag in euros is 1299 which is 1500-1600 in dollars... so the same price as the 2013 Tricross. I was hoping for a cheaper Kona Jake.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Big Lebowski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    My Bikes
    Not a Kilo TT
    Posts
    316
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bols2000 View Post
    Seems like the 2013 Kona Jake is more expensive than expected. Price tag in euros is 1299 which is 1500-1600 in dollars... so the same price as the 2013 Tricross. I was hoping for a cheaper Kona Jake.
    Hmmmm. The "Jake" is listed at $1,149 USD. Maybe you are referring to the 2013 "Jake The Snake"? That one is listed at $1,649 USD. From what I have seen, the comparable 2013 Tricross (disc brakes, Tiagra everything) is at $1,550 USD, so I think the Jake is a good price.

  19. #19
    Papaya King waynesworld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio (Grandview area)
    My Bikes
    2009 Felt X City D, 1985 (?) Trek 400, 1995 (?) Specialized Rockhopper, 1995 Trek 850
    Posts
    1,640
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Lebowski View Post
    Hmmmm. The "Jake" is listed at $1,149 USD. Maybe you are referring to the 2013 "Jake The Snake"? That one is listed at $1,649 USD. From what I have seen, the comparable 2013 Tricross (disc brakes, Tiagra everything) is at $1,550 USD, so I think the Jake is a good price.
    This seems to be the most likely scenario. If the Jake is that expensive, something is wrong.
    Quote Originally Posted by rumrunn6 View Post
    walk right in and punch the first guy you meet in the head
    2011 BMC SR02, 2010 Kona Jake, 2009 Felt X City D, 1984 (?) Trek 400, 1995 Trek 850

  20. #20
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Lebowski View Post
    Hmmmm. The "Jake" is listed at $1,149 USD. Maybe you are referring to the 2013 "Jake The Snake"? That one is listed at $1,649 USD. From what I have seen, the comparable 2013 Tricross (disc brakes, Tiagra everything) is at $1,550 USD, so I think the Jake is a good price.
    Here is what their website shows me (in Belgium) :
    kona jake.jpg

    USD/EUR conversion seems biased.
    1149 U.S. dollars should be 935 Euros
    Last edited by bols2000; 08-12-12 at 03:38 AM.

  21. #21
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    60048
    My Bikes
    Salsa Mamasita
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Just ordered the 2012...I'm 6-4 and the Jake comes with a 63cm frame...my guys at the bike shop thought the standard brakes were plenty good and the discs add a little weight. I got it for $900 since it was last years model. Won't arrive for a week, I'm pretty excited to see it.

    Kona had 16 left after mine in stock in the 63cm. Seems like a pretty good deal if you are ok without the disc brakes.

  22. #22
    idc
    idc is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Virginia/DC
    My Bikes
    GT road, Kona Jake disc, Wabi Special FG, Swift Folder, beater 26" MTB, Genesis Day 00
    Posts
    1,419
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just ordered the 2013 Jake, but asked my LBS to upgrade the brakes to BB7s w/ 160mm rotors, the crankset to a Shimano CX-70 46/36, and the shifters to 105. Still costs less than a Jake the Snake, although I like the orange color so much more It'll be ready in time for my first CX race...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •