Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: This Frame?

  1. #1
    Senior Member escarpment's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    chicago
    My Bikes
    cannondale crit 3.0, specialized allez, old giant mtb/hybrid
    Posts
    780
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    This Frame?

    what do you guys think of this frame, Tryin to build a cx, winter commuter. Guy is asking 60 bucks for this? Cromo tange tubing.
    I believe the frame is for 700 c wheels. which I have a plethora of. Im thinking if I buy this all I will need is cables, tires, and brakes as I have the rest. I would throw drop bars on this.

    Im trying to figure the geometry would work for me, Im about 5,11. Thanks.3Ka3L73If5Nb5K55Fecaja67eb7a47c6516e9.jpeg

  2. #2
    Team Water Andy_K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Jake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 2006 Kona Kula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker, 2001 LeMond Buenos Aires
    Posts
    7,258
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Seems OK, maybe. The geometry might be challenging with drop bars, sine that bike came with flat bars originally. You'll probably need a tall and stubby stem, something like a Nitto Tecnomic or Soma High Rider. It's hard to judge fit of a frame without even so much as a geometry chart.

    The seat post size might be non-standard, but Kalloy makes cheap seat posts in nearly every size imaginable. The rear brake might also be problematic. It looks like the cable stops are for a V-brake. You'd need to get creative to find a way to use cantilevers. Of course, V-brakes or mini-V's are an option, depending on what levers you go with.

  3. #3
    or tarckeemoon, depending marqueemoon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    the pesto of cities
    My Bikes
    Davidson Impulse, Merckx Titanium AX, Bruce Gordon Rock & Road, Cross Check custom build, On-One Il Pomino, Shawver Cycles cross, Zion 737, Mercian Vincitore, Brompton S1L, Charge Juicer
    Posts
    7,020
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Based on the braze-ons and paint compared to other GTs from the era this looks to be built for a u brake in the rear.

    The 2000 model was hi-ten according to Bikepedia. This looks earlier, so maybe it is not.

    I would post in C&V and find out the deal with what your brake options are. If only a u-brake will work (which is not included) I'd pass. If it's hi-ten I'd also pass.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    531
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You could do better with either a bit of patience or a bit more money. That frame's got some weirdness that might be hard to work with (U-brake in the rear for example).

  5. #5
    Senior Member ColonelJLloyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Louisville
    Posts
    8,193
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I suspect that the bike accepts standard cantilevers in the rear. Many hellenic stay designs have internal routing in the top tube with a cable exit just behind the stays, with the cable closely following the angle of the stays. The straddle cable straddles the seat tube. There could also be a housing stop in that spot for use with V-brakes.

    I have no idea about this particular frame. GT produced a wide range of bikes. That one looks like an early hybrid.
    Bikes on Flickr
    I prefer email to private messages. You can contact me at justinhughes@me.com

  6. #6
    rigamortis tortoise LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, USA
    My Bikes
    My War
    Posts
    23,234
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)
    Might even be a Ubrake in back. GT was fond of them up 'til 1991 at least.

    Just eyeballing, I'd guess bosses are too close to seattube to be for cantis.

    (oops, didn't read whole thread, now I see others have mentioned U-brakes.)

    Ubrake wouldn't be a deal killer for me, I kinda like 'em. Still plenty of BMX U-brakes available new if you can find a good shop that'll fit one for you.
    Last edited by LesterOfPuppets; 10-23-12 at 02:39 PM.
    1980ish Free Spirit Sunbird fixed * 1996 Mongoose IBOC Zero-G * 1997 KHS Comp * 1990-ish Scapin * Lemond Buenos Aires Triple

  7. #7
    Team Water Andy_K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Jake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 2006 Kona Kula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker, 2001 LeMond Buenos Aires
    Posts
    7,258
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by marqueemoon View Post
    Based on the braze-ons and paint compared to other GTs from the era this looks to be built for a u brake in the rear.
    That would explain it. I was trying to figure out how a wheel could possibly fit in that frame relative to the cantilever studs. I ended up deciding that I must just be misunderstanding the picture. A U-brake is a much better explanation.

  8. #8
    Senior Member escarpment's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    chicago
    My Bikes
    cannondale crit 3.0, specialized allez, old giant mtb/hybrid
    Posts
    780
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I really have no opposition to v or u brakes. Although I do believe I can run cantis in the back by putting the anchor bolt in the top rear triangle. I believe I can run the brake line on the bottom of the downtube. as opposed to trying to fit it all in the rear. If that makes sense. For 60 bucks I cant really go wrong.

  9. #9
    Keener splendor TimmyT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    New York, NY
    My Bikes
    Nigel Dean Tour Ace, Ciocc Designer '84, '90 Fuji Saratoga, Lynskey Litespeed Ti, Shogun 1000 triple triangle, '69 Peter Cockburn Audax
    Posts
    1,278
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by escarpment View Post
    For 60 bucks I cant really go wrong.
    +1
    If you don't like it, sell it. There's not a lot of risk in that frame.
    Quote Originally Posted by Craigslist View Post
    Note to you BLOWHARD MORONS out there: The fork is not bent. Most PEUGEOTS of the '70s forks DID NOT line up with the head tube angle. This is normal. The last pic is from the 1972 Dutch catalog showing this EXACT MODEL in diagram. Keep your comments to yourself......
    It's pronounced, "Co-burn."

  10. #10
    or tarckeemoon, depending marqueemoon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    the pesto of cities
    My Bikes
    Davidson Impulse, Merckx Titanium AX, Bruce Gordon Rock & Road, Cross Check custom build, On-One Il Pomino, Shawver Cycles cross, Zion 737, Mercian Vincitore, Brompton S1L, Charge Juicer
    Posts
    7,020
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's not the cost of the frame. It's the cost and investment of time to make it into a functioning bicycle.

  11. #11
    Senior Member escarpment's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    chicago
    My Bikes
    cannondale crit 3.0, specialized allez, old giant mtb/hybrid
    Posts
    780
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you make a good point, I figure Id probably spend another 200 on parts, I just want something with 700c wheels to bomb trails on.

  12. #12
    Senior Member ColonelJLloyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Louisville
    Posts
    8,193
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LesterOfPuppets View Post
    Just eyeballing, I'd guess bosses are too close to seattube to be for cantis.
    Ah.
    Bikes on Flickr
    I prefer email to private messages. You can contact me at justinhughes@me.com

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    369
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by escarpment View Post
    I figure Id probably spend another 200 on parts
    That's very optimistic. Building up your own bike is oftentimes so much more expensive than just buying a complete one. The bar tape, the tires, the brakes... it adds up. (Unless of course you have all that lying around.)

  14. #14
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    7,670
    Mentioned
    71 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    brake cable run under the top tube kinda sux for cross, if you have any
    hills to run up, shouldering the bike..

    but as a JRA, bike thats not in the plans, I guess.

  15. #15
    Senior Member escarpment's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    chicago
    My Bikes
    cannondale crit 3.0, specialized allez, old giant mtb/hybrid
    Posts
    780
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I dont really plan on racing this thing, and I already have crank/bb. road break levers, bar, stem, saddle, post, pedals, and wheels. I believe all I need is canti or u brakes, tires, chainring, and some bits and pieces.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Breathegood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Castle Rock, CO
    My Bikes
    '09 Gary Fisher "Kaitai, '09 Raleigh Team", '91 Trek 8700, '97 Cannondale SR500, '12 Raleigh Twin Six
    Posts
    330
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Why not build it up as a single speed with a front brake only. Not only is it the easiest, cheapest option, it eliminates any guesswork or creative cabling for the rear. If it's primary intended use is winter commuter, I can see other advantages to SS. No worries about snow, ice, or debris buildup on deraileurs. Easier to maintain and troubleshoot on the road, and it weighs less. Unless I'm carrying a large load over a long distance or big elevation changes, my preference would be to commute on a SS anyway. My commute is 23 miles one-way with 1600' of elevation gain. My SS is still my preferred commuter. Get a slighlty bigger cog and longer chain for race day and you also look like the badass racing SSCX with no worries about mud or debris fouling your brakes or drivetrain. If you decide you don't like the way it rides as a SS, you've made minimal investment with time and money. If you like the way it rides as a SS, maybe its worth putting a little more into it as a geared bike.
    1991 Trek 8700 - SS conversion, 2009 Gary Fisher "Kaitai", 2009 Raleigh Team, 2012 Raleigh Twin Six,1996 Cannondale SR500

  17. #17
    or tarckeemoon, depending marqueemoon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    the pesto of cities
    My Bikes
    Davidson Impulse, Merckx Titanium AX, Bruce Gordon Rock & Road, Cross Check custom build, On-One Il Pomino, Shawver Cycles cross, Zion 737, Mercian Vincitore, Brompton S1L, Charge Juicer
    Posts
    7,020
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I strongly disagree with the idea of racing singlespeed with only a front brake.

    In most commuting situations front brake only singlespeed would be ok, but why risk it?

    Fixed gear with a front brake is a different story as you can modulate speed with your legs. You also get a little better traction feedback and the constant spinning will keep you a little warmer when it's chilly out. However, cranky knees, cold weather, and a fixed gear are not always a good combo.

    Fixed is way more fun with bigger tires though. You can just plow over stuff and keep spinning.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •