Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    69
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    What's the largest CC bike I can get?!

    The largest CycleCross bike I can find is the Surly Long Haul Trucker -- 64cm. Anyone know of anything close to that? Not sure I can spend *that* much...

  2. #2
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    2,519
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Zinn cycles http://zinncycles.com/Zinn/index.php/archives/5 Lennard is a specialist in building bikes for tall riders.

    Good luck the budget market stops at 60cm.

    LHT is Touring bike ... a 60, Trek cross rip is a commuter cross bike,
    or .. are you actually wanting a cross racing bike to compete?
    Last edited by fietsbob; 06-02-13 at 04:48 PM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    69
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Need a tough city commuter bike... tired of riding a MTB on concrete since I moved to the city... but sometimes I do take it back home and get on some park trails...

  4. #4
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    2,519
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hit The Bike Shops see what they can Get for You. IDK what Brands are sold where you Live..

    want to Import a Thorn Frame and fork, From SJS in England?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    69
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The biggest bikes I can find: 2012 Trek 25" FX 7.5 @800 // Surly LHT 64cm @1300

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    354
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Dublin, OH
    My Bikes
    Serial bike flipper
    Posts
    341
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    BMC Monstercross now comes in a 65cm.

    My 62cm Crosscheck's top tube actually measures closer to 615mm when I measure it--that's pretty darn long.
    My ad-free blog: http://bikingtoplay.blogspot.com/

  8. #8
    Have bike, will travel Barrettscv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Windy City
    My Bikes
    A road bike for every purpose
    Posts
    9,370
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Soma double cross in a 62cm size with a 612mm top-tube. http://www.somafab.com/archives/product/double-cross-dc
    Last edited by Barrettscv; 06-25-13 at 07:49 PM.
    2014 Trek DS.1: "Viaggiatore" A do-it-all bike that is waiting in Italy
    2012 Pedal Force CG2: "Secolo Bicicletta" the modern carbon fiber road bike
    2012 Pedal Force CX2: "Carbone CX" the carbon fiber CX bike
    2010 Origin 8 CX 700: "Servizio Grave" Monstercross/29er bike
    1997 Simoncini Special Cyclocross: "Little Simon" lugged Columbus steel CX bike
    1987 Serotta Nova Special X: "Azzurri" The retro Columbus SPX steel road bike
    1971ish Peugeot PX10: "Fancy Lugs"

  9. #9
    Senior Member IthaDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    My Bikes
    Click on the #YOLO
    Posts
    4,652
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Bikesdirect has a 64cm listed on their geometry charts for the motor bacon "fantom" cyclocross framed bikes.

    Shimano : Click :: Campy :: Snap :: SRAM : Bang

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Dublin, OH
    My Bikes
    Serial bike flipper
    Posts
    341
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Interesting thing about the 62cm DC is that it's barely bigger than the 60cm. Since the 60cm has a steeper seat angle, the ETT difference isn't all that great. Look at the wheelbase: only 4mm difference. Since the chainstays and fork rake/length are the same, that's all the top reach difference there is.

    Quote Originally Posted by Barrettscv View Post
    Soma double cross in a 62cm size with a 614mm top-tube. http://www.somafab.com/archives/product/double-cross-dc
    My ad-free blog: http://bikingtoplay.blogspot.com/

  11. #11
    Senior Member GrayJay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    EagleRiver AK
    Posts
    1,229
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    On the DC, both the ETT and actual top tube measurement grow by +1mm between the 60 & 62mm frame size. You wouldnt want for the wheelbase to grow by same amount as the TT, the front-center and wheelbase would get too long for good handeling and ballance. They tried to limit the growth of F-C and wheelbase by slackening the seatube of the larger frame, effectivly shifting the rider saddle and weight distribution backwards. What they probably should have also done is to combine any change of the STA along with progressivly steepening the head tube angle going from small to large sizes, so that this could also be used to control the wheelbase and F-C, without shifting whe rider back further over the rear wheel, messing up weight distribution.
    Probably one real limitiation that they were working with for the DC was the available size limitiation for tange prestige tubing. Go any longer on the TT and you probably need to source a stiffer, stronger tubeset to withstand forces of the additional length.

  12. #12
    Have bike, will travel Barrettscv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Windy City
    My Bikes
    A road bike for every purpose
    Posts
    9,370
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by GrayJay View Post
    On the DC, both the ETT and actual top tube measurement grow by +1mm between the 60 & 62mm frame size. You wouldnt want for the wheelbase to grow by same amount as the TT, the front-center and wheelbase would get too long for good handeling and ballance. They tried to limit the growth of F-C and wheelbase by slackening the seatube of the larger frame, effectivly shifting the rider saddle and weight distribution backwards. What they probably should have also done is to combine any change of the STA along with progressivly steepening the head tube angle going from small to large sizes, so that this could also be used to control the wheelbase and F-C, without shifting whe rider back further over the rear wheel, messing up weight distribution.
    Probably one real limitiation that they were working with for the DC was the available size limitiation for tange prestige tubing. Go any longer on the TT and you probably need to source a stiffer, stronger tubeset to withstand forces of the additional length.
    Yes, I agree about the rigidity of the Tange Prestige tubeset. I had a size 60cm Double Cross and loved the smooth ride quality. I'm 210 lbs and the frame felt rigid on flatter routes at a moderate pace. However, the flex in the frame became an issue while climbing or trying to keep pace above 21 mph for long time periods. I would not recommend this frame for a stronger rider in the 200 lbs or larger range.
    2014 Trek DS.1: "Viaggiatore" A do-it-all bike that is waiting in Italy
    2012 Pedal Force CG2: "Secolo Bicicletta" the modern carbon fiber road bike
    2012 Pedal Force CX2: "Carbone CX" the carbon fiber CX bike
    2010 Origin 8 CX 700: "Servizio Grave" Monstercross/29er bike
    1997 Simoncini Special Cyclocross: "Little Simon" lugged Columbus steel CX bike
    1987 Serotta Nova Special X: "Azzurri" The retro Columbus SPX steel road bike
    1971ish Peugeot PX10: "Fancy Lugs"

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Dublin, OH
    My Bikes
    Serial bike flipper
    Posts
    341
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Or for another view on frame stiffness, look here.

    Quote Originally Posted by Barrettscv View Post
    Yes, I agree about the rigidity of the Tange Prestige tubeset. I had a size 60cm Double Cross and loved the smooth ride quality. I'm 210 lbs and the frame felt rigid on flatter routes at a moderate pace. However, the flex in the frame became an issue while climbing or trying to keep pace above 21 mph for long time periods. I would not recommend this frame for a stronger rider in the 200 lbs or larger range.
    My ad-free blog: http://bikingtoplay.blogspot.com/

  14. #14
    Have bike, will travel Barrettscv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Windy City
    My Bikes
    A road bike for every purpose
    Posts
    9,370
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by seat_boy View Post
    Or for another view on frame stiffness, look here.
    That was underwhelming.

    Larger frames with heavier riders need stiffer tubesets than smaller frames with lighter riders. I might be concerned about an overly stiff frame if the OP was a smaller cyclist on a smaller frame size. However, that is not the case here.
    Last edited by Barrettscv; 06-28-13 at 07:00 AM.
    2014 Trek DS.1: "Viaggiatore" A do-it-all bike that is waiting in Italy
    2012 Pedal Force CG2: "Secolo Bicicletta" the modern carbon fiber road bike
    2012 Pedal Force CX2: "Carbone CX" the carbon fiber CX bike
    2010 Origin 8 CX 700: "Servizio Grave" Monstercross/29er bike
    1997 Simoncini Special Cyclocross: "Little Simon" lugged Columbus steel CX bike
    1987 Serotta Nova Special X: "Azzurri" The retro Columbus SPX steel road bike
    1971ish Peugeot PX10: "Fancy Lugs"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •