Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

Fork upgrade - Kona to EC90x ?

Search
Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Fork upgrade - Kona to EC90x ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-14, 02:49 PM
  #1  
(retired from forum)
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 163
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Fork upgrade - Kona to EC90x ?

Howdy

I've got a '09 Snake with stock kinda-carbon "Carbon Cross" fork. I suspect it's on the heavier side, being mostly alloy, and wonder if the Easton fork might be significantly lighter and ride better.

Anyone happen to know what the Carbon Cross forks weigh? I know the EC90s are less than 400g, some even under 300... that's pretty damn light

Think the Easton fork will ride noticeably better?
The B is offline  
Old 05-26-14, 06:57 PM
  #2  
ride for a change
 
modernjess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 2,221

Bikes: Surly Cross-check & Moonlander, Pivot Mach 429, Ted Wojcik Sof-Trac, Ridley Orion. Santa Cruz Stigmata

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Can't compare but I have an EC90x on my Santa Cruz stigmata. Tracks well, is pretty light, spec is 485 grams uncut, and it absorbs chatter well. Some users say they shudder under heavy braking load with canti's but I have yet to experience this. I'm running TRP mini v brakes on it. Came with the bike, I can't think of a reason to switch it, pretty boss.
modernjess is offline  
Old 05-27-14, 06:36 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Kopsis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 1,258
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I have a Kinesis carbon CX fork that is likely similar to what's on your Kona -- alloy steer tube, crown, and dropouts with carbon legs. Weighs in around 660g cut.
Kopsis is offline  
Old 05-27-14, 08:22 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Whisky fork comes in all flavors (canti/disc, tapered/straight) and the canti versions have a hole in the crown to mount a cable hanger.
flargle is offline  
Old 05-27-14, 11:17 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times in 1,439 Posts
Are you experiencing any problems with your current fork?

You might save half a pound in weight, but I'd be surprised if you feel that. In theory alloy steerers transmit more "buzz" to the handlebars than carbon steerers, but if you're running 32+ mm wide tires at relatively low pressure that will probably make the fork's buzz absorption irrelevant. If you're using your Snake as a road bike, maybe that will matter to you.

The biggest difference between CX forks seems to be how well they handle hard braking. Many carbon forks shudder badly under hard braking. Forks which allow a fork-mounted cable hanger generally minimize this problem. I don't know how the EC90 compares in either of these respects.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 05-27-14, 12:40 PM
  #6  
(retired from forum)
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 163
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Andy_K
Are you experiencing any problems with your current fork?

You might save half a pound in weight, but I'd be surprised if you feel that. In theory alloy steerers transmit more "buzz" to the handlebars than carbon steerers, but if you're running 32+ mm wide tires at relatively low pressure that will probably make the fork's buzz absorption irrelevant. If you're using your Snake as a road bike, maybe that will matter to you.

The biggest difference between CX forks seems to be how well they handle hard braking. Many carbon forks shudder badly under hard braking. Forks which allow a fork-mounted cable hanger generally minimize this problem. I don't know how the EC90 compares in either of these respects.
No problems. But a half a pound of weight saved is appealing. Looking at weight-weenies, the only other Kona forks listed (the Carbon Cross isn't) are like 1300g.... if mines anywhere near that, it'd be a lot more than a half lb saved.

It's my long-distance commuter, but I have, and intend to do more CX races with it. I guess it's irrelevant, except that the bike generally does 120-200 miles a week on pavement- so a reduction in vibration might be noticeable. I originally had an EC90 carbon bar on this bike, for sake of reducing vibration, and specifically in the hopes of reducing hand numbness.. but I actually took it off in favor of an aluminum Deda I thought fit my hands better.... and while I can definitely feel the road more, I haven't found it a bothersome difference.

Guess the only way to answer to the question will be to pull the fork and plop it on the scale...
The B is offline  
Old 05-27-14, 01:13 PM
  #7  
(retired from forum)
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 163
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
714g with 8" of steerer....

so yea, it'd probably be around a half pound shaved. And a smoother ride, probably...
The B is offline  
Old 05-27-14, 01:46 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times in 1,439 Posts
I doubt it's anywhere near 1300 grams, but 700-800 doesn't seem out of the question for a fork with an alloy steerer and you'll be able to find a sub-500 gram replacement easily enough.

Fork shudder can really suck for CX racing, so make sure you get specific feedback on that out before you buy any fork. My 2008 Kona Major Jake originally came with an EC90X fork, but the owner before me replaced it with an Alpha Q CX20 (which I like a lot). I couldn't say why the original was replaced or even if the EC90X that came on this bike is equivalent to today's EC90 forks.

Have you considered using this as an opportunity to put a disc brake on the front? It would add weight rather than remove it, but it's a nice upgrade, especially for commuting.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 05-27-14, 02:24 PM
  #9  
(retired from forum)
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 163
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Andy_K
I doubt it's anywhere near 1300 grams, but 700-800 doesn't seem out of the question for a fork with an alloy steerer and you'll be able to find a sub-500 gram replacement easily enough.

Fork shudder can really suck for CX racing, so make sure you get specific feedback on that out before you buy any fork. My 2008 Kona Major Jake originally came with an EC90X fork, but the owner before me replaced it with an Alpha Q CX20 (which I like a lot). I couldn't say why the original was replaced or even if the EC90X that came on this bike is equivalent to today's EC90 forks.

Have you considered using this as an opportunity to put a disc brake on the front? It would add weight rather than remove it, but it's a nice upgrade, especially for commuting.
I've pretty firmly rejecting the idea of going disk. Mini-vs seem to be pretty good, and while I don't go crazy with trying to slash weight, I definitely don't want to deliberately add it. I want to get into cross, but I'm too much of a roadie at heart.
The B is offline  
Old 05-27-14, 05:34 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Kopsis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 1,258
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I've raced Cat 4 on a 23 lb bike and a 19 lb bike and I actually did better on the 23 On the list of what matters for CX, a half pound of weight is a long way from the top (until you start riding in the elite categories). And a "smooth" riding fork usually means a lot of flex which is not a good thing for CX. If you want to go racing, spend your money on a set of CX tubulars. You'll likely drop more than a half pound AND actually gain a serious performance advantage.
Kopsis is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Northwestrider
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
4
12-05-18 10:57 PM
destroypedal
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
12
09-29-14 03:44 PM
Steely Dan
Commuting
86
05-17-13 11:04 AM
sund
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
8
03-13-12 03:26 PM
Quixotegut
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
8
09-02-10 06:32 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.