Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Recumbent What IS that thing?! Recumbents may be odd looking, but they have many advantages over a "wedgie" bicycle. Discuss the in's and out's recumbent lifestyle in the recumbent forum.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-13-03, 11:48 AM   #1
Dahon.Steve
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Jersey
Bikes:
Posts: 6,848
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Giant Revive - Test rode

Last week at the bike show in New York City, I test rode the Giant Revive. Needless to say, I loved it. Here's a pic of it.

http://www.giant-bicycles.com/us/030...828&lYear=2003

I know alot of traditional bent riders will look in disgust at this bike but it's really a very beautiful recumbent. Seriously. The paint job on that bike is MUCH better than the pic on the Giant web site. I thought it was the most beautiful bike out of all the test models we had to choose form. People were staring only at ME when I rode that bike.

Here are the pros and cons.

PROS - The bike was comfortable. The seat could have been improved but it's fine as a comfort bike. It was also highly adjustable. To be totally honest, I don't know of a better "comfort" bike than this one. This bike is more confortable than any hybrid or cruiser that I've ridden. There weren't any bumps to test the shock but it looked like a solid unit.

LOW GEARED - The bike was very low geared. This is a positive since you need these to spin up hills. I don't think you should have any problems with hills but mountains may be a different story. I tested all the gears and found the Sora system shifted very easily.

HIGH SEAT POSITION - You can actually ride this bike on city streets. Your not sitting low and your about the same height as a mountain bike. A must for city riding.

OTHER POSITIVE POINTS - The bike had internal cable routing. and the rear alloy rack was built into the bike just like the BikeE but better designed. The bike used internal hub brakes. Excellant. The wheels were solid and came with fenders. It even had a built in spot on the frame specifically designed where you could attach a U-Lock to. The length of the Revive was about the same size of Hybrid. Giant thinks of everything.

now for the CONS.

NOT ENOUGH GEARS - While the Sora unit worked very well and was low geared, the bent really needed more gears. I think we'll see this in the 2004 version. I'm keeping my fingers crossed.

NOT A REAL BENT SEAT - The seat was very good but not "Rans" quality. I don't see you having problems with this seat since the shock is right under it, but it was a sore point. I'm almost positive you can do 25 - 30 miles with this seat without pain. It wasn't bad but not great.

HEAVY -- The bike's weight was about 42 pounds. I really think Giant needs to bring this down to 35 for it to be considered a serious recumbent. There's no reason why this bike needs to weight that much.

Overall. I think the Revive is a work in progress. I really believe the improvements will eventually show up especially the lack of gears. The Revive is about 75% there and I have high hopes for this bent. I would put this bike in the same catagory as the BikeE AT and has the potential to be a lot more. We can close the door on the 2003 model and eagerly wait for the 2004. If they install the Sram 3 by 9, fit a better seat and cut down 7 pounds, this bike is MINE!!

On a positive note, Giant was actually marketing this Bent with a huge display and allowing anyone to test ride it while ignoring their road bikes.
Dahon.Steve is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-05, 08:14 PM   #2
lizc
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Steve - i know you wrote your review awhile ago, so not sure if you are still part of the forum. i wanted to know what bike shop in new york city you purchased your giant revive for $600. thanks, liz
lizc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-05, 04:43 PM   #3
BlazingPedals
Senior Member
 
BlazingPedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of da Mitten
Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, homebuilt recumbent
Posts: 8,944
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 103 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahon.Steve
NOT A REAL BENT SEAT - The seat was very good but not "Rans" quality. I don't see you having problems with this seat since the shock is right under it, but it was a sore point. I'm almost positive you can do 25 - 30 miles with this seat without pain. It wasn't bad but not great.
It doesn't have a real bent seat because it's not really a bent. Nobody in bent circles has defined exactly where a bike stops being a bent, but this bike has you sitting more upright than most Safety Bikes would. You can't put a regular recumbent seat on it because there's too much drop from seat to pedals.
BlazingPedals is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-05, 07:16 AM   #4
cjscott
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hi. I rode the Giant Revive and we're looking for recumbents. I LUVED the look of this bike and the feel of it, but had a problem steering it or turning. If you purchased this one and have any input about the steering also, please let me know. I'm not sure if I would get the hang of it or not, but we were leaning towards this bike, at least for me. (My husband likes the Action Bent so far). Thanks CJ
cjscott is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:16 PM.